The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

A mathematical and computational framework for reliable real-time solution of parametrized partial differential equations

Christophe Prud'homme; Dimitrios V. Rovas; Karen Veroy; Anthony T. Patera

ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis - Modélisation Mathématique et Analyse Numérique (2002)

  • Volume: 36, Issue: 5, page 747-771
  • ISSN: 0764-583X

Abstract

top
We present in this article two components: these components can in fact serve various goals independently, though we consider them here as an ensemble. The first component is a technique for the rapid and reliable evaluation prediction of linear functional outputs of elliptic (and parabolic) partial differential equations with affine parameter dependence. The essential features are (i) (provably) rapidly convergent global reduced–basis approximations — Galerkin projection onto a space W N spanned by solutions of the governing partial differential equation at N selected points in parameter space; (ii) a posteriori error estimation — relaxations of the error–residual equation that provide inexpensive yet sharp and rigorous bounds for the error in the outputs of interest; and (iii) off–line/on–line computational procedures — methods which decouple the generation and projection stages of the approximation process. This component is ideally suited — considering the operation count of the online stage — for the repeated and rapid evaluation required in the context of parameter estimation, design, optimization, and real–time control. The second component is a framework for distributed simulations. This framework comprises a library providing the necessary abstractions/concepts for distributed simulations and a small set of tools — namely SimTeXand SimLaB— allowing an easy manipulation of those simulations. While the library is the backbone of the framework and is therefore general, the various interfaces answer specific needs. We shall describe both components and present how they interact.

How to cite

top

Prud'homme, Christophe, et al. "A mathematical and computational framework for reliable real-time solution of parametrized partial differential equations." ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis - Modélisation Mathématique et Analyse Numérique 36.5 (2002): 747-771. <http://eudml.org/doc/245381>.

@article{Prudhomme2002,
abstract = {We present in this article two components: these components can in fact serve various goals independently, though we consider them here as an ensemble. The first component is a technique for the rapid and reliable evaluation prediction of linear functional outputs of elliptic (and parabolic) partial differential equations with affine parameter dependence. The essential features are (i) (provably) rapidly convergent global reduced–basis approximations — Galerkin projection onto a space $W_N$ spanned by solutions of the governing partial differential equation at $N$ selected points in parameter space; (ii) a posteriori error estimation — relaxations of the error–residual equation that provide inexpensive yet sharp and rigorous bounds for the error in the outputs of interest; and (iii) off–line/on–line computational procedures — methods which decouple the generation and projection stages of the approximation process. This component is ideally suited — considering the operation count of the online stage — for the repeated and rapid evaluation required in the context of parameter estimation, design, optimization, and real–time control. The second component is a framework for distributed simulations. This framework comprises a library providing the necessary abstractions/concepts for distributed simulations and a small set of tools — namely SimTeXand SimLaB— allowing an easy manipulation of those simulations. While the library is the backbone of the framework and is therefore general, the various interfaces answer specific needs. We shall describe both components and present how they interact.},
author = {Prud'homme, Christophe, Rovas, Dimitrios V., Veroy, Karen, Patera, Anthony T.},
journal = {ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis - Modélisation Mathématique et Analyse Numérique},
keywords = {mathematical framework; reduced-basis methods; error bounds; computational framework; simulations repository; distributed and parallel computing; CORBA; C++; elliptic equations; parabolic equations; convergence; Galerkin projection},
language = {eng},
number = {5},
pages = {747-771},
publisher = {EDP-Sciences},
title = {A mathematical and computational framework for reliable real-time solution of parametrized partial differential equations},
url = {http://eudml.org/doc/245381},
volume = {36},
year = {2002},
}

TY - JOUR
AU - Prud'homme, Christophe
AU - Rovas, Dimitrios V.
AU - Veroy, Karen
AU - Patera, Anthony T.
TI - A mathematical and computational framework for reliable real-time solution of parametrized partial differential equations
JO - ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis - Modélisation Mathématique et Analyse Numérique
PY - 2002
PB - EDP-Sciences
VL - 36
IS - 5
SP - 747
EP - 771
AB - We present in this article two components: these components can in fact serve various goals independently, though we consider them here as an ensemble. The first component is a technique for the rapid and reliable evaluation prediction of linear functional outputs of elliptic (and parabolic) partial differential equations with affine parameter dependence. The essential features are (i) (provably) rapidly convergent global reduced–basis approximations — Galerkin projection onto a space $W_N$ spanned by solutions of the governing partial differential equation at $N$ selected points in parameter space; (ii) a posteriori error estimation — relaxations of the error–residual equation that provide inexpensive yet sharp and rigorous bounds for the error in the outputs of interest; and (iii) off–line/on–line computational procedures — methods which decouple the generation and projection stages of the approximation process. This component is ideally suited — considering the operation count of the online stage — for the repeated and rapid evaluation required in the context of parameter estimation, design, optimization, and real–time control. The second component is a framework for distributed simulations. This framework comprises a library providing the necessary abstractions/concepts for distributed simulations and a small set of tools — namely SimTeXand SimLaB— allowing an easy manipulation of those simulations. While the library is the backbone of the framework and is therefore general, the various interfaces answer specific needs. We shall describe both components and present how they interact.
LA - eng
KW - mathematical framework; reduced-basis methods; error bounds; computational framework; simulations repository; distributed and parallel computing; CORBA; C++; elliptic equations; parabolic equations; convergence; Galerkin projection
UR - http://eudml.org/doc/245381
ER -

References

top
  1. [1] M.A. Akgun, J.H. Garcelon and R.T. Haftka, Fast exact linear and non-linear structural reanalysis and the Sherman-Morrison-Woodbury formulas. Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 50 (2001) 1587–1606. Zbl0971.74076
  2. [2] E. Allgower and K. Georg, Simplicial and continuation methods for approximating fixed-points and solutions to systems of equations. SIAM Rev. 22 (1980) 28–85. Zbl0432.65027
  3. [3] B.O. Almroth, P. Stern and F.A. Brogan, Automatic choice of global shape functions in structural analysis. AIAA Journal 16 (1978) 525–528. 
  4. [4] A. Barrett and G. Reddien, On the reduced basis method. Z. Angew. Math. Mech. 75 (1995) 543–549. Zbl0832.65047
  5. [5] T.F. Chan and W.L. Wan, Analysis of projection methods for solving linear systems with multiple right-hand sides. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 18 (1997) 1698–1721. Zbl0888.65033
  6. [6] A.G. Evans, J.W. Hutchinson, N.A. Fleck, M.F. Ashby and H.N.G. Wadley, The topological design of multifunctional cellular metals. Prog. Mater. Sci. 46 (2001) 309–327. 
  7. [7] C. Farhat, L. Crivelli and F.X. Roux, Extending substructure based iterative solvers to multiple load and repeated analyses. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 117 (1994) 195–209. Zbl0851.73059
  8. [8] J.P. Fink and W.C. Rheinboldt, On the error behavior of the reduced basis technique for nonlinear finite element approximations. Z. Angew. Math. Mech. 63 (1983) 21–28. Zbl0533.73071
  9. [9] L. Machiels, J. Peraire and A.T. Patera, A posteriori finite element output bounds for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations; Application to a natural convection problem. J. Comput. Phys. 172 (2001) 401–425. Zbl1002.76069
  10. [10] Y. Maday, L. Machiels, A.T. Patera and D.V. Rovas, Blackbox reduced-basis output bound methods for shape optimization, in Proceedings 12 t h International Domain Decomposition Conference, Chiba, Japan (2000) 429–436. 
  11. [11] Y. Maday, A.T. Patera and J. Peraire, A general formulation for a posteriori bounds for output functionals of partial differential equations; Application to the eigenvalue problem. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I Math. 328 (1999) 823–828. Zbl0933.65129
  12. [12] Y. Maday, A.T. Patera and G. Turinici, Global a priori convergence theory for reduced-basis approximation of single-parameter symmetric coercive elliptic partial differential equations. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I Math. 335 (2002) 1–6. Zbl1009.65066
  13. [13] A.K. Noor and J.M. Peters, Reduced basis technique for nonlinear analysis of structures. AIAA Journal 18 (1980) 455–462. 
  14. [14] A.T. Patera and E.M. Rønquist, A general output bound result: Application to discretization and iteration error estimation and control. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 11 (2001) 685–712. Zbl1012.65110
  15. [15] A.T. Patera and E.M. Rønquist, A general output bound result: Application to discretization and iteration error estimation and control. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. (2000). MIT FML Report 98-12-1. Zbl1012.65110
  16. [16] J.S. Peterson, The reduced basis method for incompressible viscous flow calculations. SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput. 10 (1989) 777–786. Zbl0672.76034
  17. [17] T.A. Porsching, Estimation of the error in the reduced basis method solution of nonlinear equations. Math. Comp. 45 (1985) 487–496. Zbl0586.65040
  18. [18] C. Prud’homme, A Framework for Reliable Real-Time Web-Based Distributed Simulations. MIT (to appear). 
  19. [19] C. Prud’homme, D. Rovas, K. Veroy, Y. Maday, A.T. Patera and G. Turinici, Reliable real-time solution of parametrized partial differential equations: Reduced-basis output bounds methods. J. Fluids Engrg. 124 (2002) 70–80. 
  20. [20] W.C. Rheinboldt, Numerical analysis of continuation methods for nonlinear structural problems. Comput. Structures 13 (1981) 103–113. Zbl0465.65030
  21. [21] W.C. Rheinboldt, On the theory and error estimation of the reduced basis method for multi-parameter problems. Nonlinear Anal. 21 (1993) 849–858. Zbl0802.65068
  22. [22] D. Rovas, Reduced-Basis Output Bound Methods for Partial Differential Equations. Ph.D. thesis, MIT (in progress). 
  23. [23] K. Veroy, Reduced Basis Methods Applied to Problems in Elasticity: Analysis and Applications. Ph.D. thesis, MIT (in progress). 
  24. [24] N. Wicks and J. W. Hutchinson, Optimal truss plates. Internat. J. Solids Structures 38 (2001) 5165–5183. Zbl0995.74054
  25. [25] E.L. Yip, A note on the stability of solving a rank- p modification of a linear system by the Sherman-Morrison-Woodbury formula. SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput. 7 (1986) 507–513. Zbl0628.65020

NotesEmbed ?

top

You must be logged in to post comments.

To embed these notes on your page include the following JavaScript code on your page where you want the notes to appear.

Only the controls for the widget will be shown in your chosen language. Notes will be shown in their authored language.

Tells the widget how many notes to show per page. You can cycle through additional notes using the next and previous controls.

    
                

                
Note: Best practice suggests putting the JavaScript code just before the closing </body> tag.