Gliviak, Ferdinand, and Kyš, Peter. "Note on the relation between radius and diameter of a graph." Mathematica Bohemica 120.2 (1995): 203-207. <http://eudml.org/doc/247802>.
@article{Gliviak1995,
abstract = {The known relation between the standard radius and diameter holds for graphs, but not for digraphs. We show that no upper estimation is possible for digraphs. We also give some remarks on distances, which are either metric or non-metric.},
author = {Gliviak, Ferdinand, Kyš, Peter},
journal = {Mathematica Bohemica},
keywords = {digraph; radius; diameter; graph; strong digraph; digraph; radius; diameter},
language = {eng},
number = {2},
pages = {203-207},
publisher = {Institute of Mathematics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic},
title = {Note on the relation between radius and diameter of a graph},
url = {http://eudml.org/doc/247802},
volume = {120},
year = {1995},
}
TY - JOUR
AU - Gliviak, Ferdinand
AU - Kyš, Peter
TI - Note on the relation between radius and diameter of a graph
JO - Mathematica Bohemica
PY - 1995
PB - Institute of Mathematics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic
VL - 120
IS - 2
SP - 203
EP - 207
AB - The known relation between the standard radius and diameter holds for graphs, but not for digraphs. We show that no upper estimation is possible for digraphs. We also give some remarks on distances, which are either metric or non-metric.
LA - eng
KW - digraph; radius; diameter; graph; strong digraph; digraph; radius; diameter
UR - http://eudml.org/doc/247802
ER -