Explicit cogenerators for the homotopy category of projective modules over a ring

Amnon Neeman

Annales scientifiques de l'École Normale Supérieure (2011)

  • Volume: 44, Issue: 4, page 607-629
  • ISSN: 0012-9593

Abstract

top
Let R be a ring. In two previous articles [12, 14] we studied the homotopy category 𝐊 ( R - Proj ) of projective R -modules. We produced a set of generators for this category, proved that the category is 1 -compactly generated for any ring R , and showed that it need not always be compactly generated, but is for sufficiently nice R . We furthermore analyzed the inclusion j ! : 𝐊 ( R - Proj ) 𝐊 ( R - Flat ) and the orthogonal subcategory 𝒮 = 𝐊 ( R - Proj ) . And we even showed that the inclusion 𝒮 𝐊 ( R - Flat ) has a right adjoint; this forces some natural map to be an equivalence 𝐊 ( R - Proj ) 𝒮 . In this article we produce a set of cogenerators for 𝐊 ( R - Proj ) . More accurately, this set of cogenerators naturally lies in the equivalent 𝒮 𝐊 ( R - Proj ) ; it can be used to give yet another proof of the fact that the inclusion 𝒮 𝐊 ( R - Flat ) has a right adjoint. But by now several proofs of this fact already exist.

How to cite

top

Neeman, Amnon. "Explicit cogenerators for the homotopy category of projective modules over a ring." Annales scientifiques de l'École Normale Supérieure 44.4 (2011): 607-629. <http://eudml.org/doc/272245>.

@article{Neeman2011,
abstract = {Let $R$ be a ring. In two previous articles [12, 14] we studied the homotopy category $\mathbf \{K\}(R\text\{-\}\mathrm \{Proj\})$ of projective $R$-modules. We produced a set of generators for this category, proved that the category is $\aleph _1$-compactly generated for any ring $R$, and showed that it need not always be compactly generated, but is for sufficiently nice $R$. We furthermore analyzed the inclusion $j_!^\{\}:\mathbf \{K\}(R\text\{-\}\mathrm \{Proj\})\rightarrow \mathbf \{K\}(R\text\{-\}\mathrm \{Flat\})$ and the orthogonal subcategory $\mathcal \{S\}=\{\mathbf \{K\}(R\text\{-\}\mathrm \{Proj\})\}^\perp $. And we even showed that the inclusion $\mathcal \{S\}\rightarrow \mathbf \{K\}(R\text\{-\}\mathrm \{Flat\})$ has a right adjoint; this forces some natural map to be an equivalence $\mathbf \{K\}(R\text\{-\}\mathrm \{Proj\})\rightarrow \mathcal \{S\}^\perp $. In this article we produce a set of cogenerators for $\mathbf \{K\}(R\text\{-\}\mathrm \{Proj\})$. More accurately, this set of cogenerators naturally lies in the equivalent $\mathcal \{S\}^\perp \cong \mathbf \{K\}(R\text\{-\}\mathrm \{Proj\})$; it can be used to give yet another proof of the fact that the inclusion $\mathcal \{S\}\rightarrow \mathbf \{K\}(R\text\{-\}\mathrm \{Flat\})$ has a right adjoint. But by now several proofs of this fact already exist.},
author = {Neeman, Amnon},
journal = {Annales scientifiques de l'École Normale Supérieure},
keywords = {triangulated categories; generators; cogenerators; flat modules; projective modules},
language = {eng},
number = {4},
pages = {607-629},
publisher = {Société mathématique de France},
title = {Explicit cogenerators for the homotopy category of projective modules over a ring},
url = {http://eudml.org/doc/272245},
volume = {44},
year = {2011},
}

TY - JOUR
AU - Neeman, Amnon
TI - Explicit cogenerators for the homotopy category of projective modules over a ring
JO - Annales scientifiques de l'École Normale Supérieure
PY - 2011
PB - Société mathématique de France
VL - 44
IS - 4
SP - 607
EP - 629
AB - Let $R$ be a ring. In two previous articles [12, 14] we studied the homotopy category $\mathbf {K}(R\text{-}\mathrm {Proj})$ of projective $R$-modules. We produced a set of generators for this category, proved that the category is $\aleph _1$-compactly generated for any ring $R$, and showed that it need not always be compactly generated, but is for sufficiently nice $R$. We furthermore analyzed the inclusion $j_!^{}:\mathbf {K}(R\text{-}\mathrm {Proj})\rightarrow \mathbf {K}(R\text{-}\mathrm {Flat})$ and the orthogonal subcategory $\mathcal {S}={\mathbf {K}(R\text{-}\mathrm {Proj})}^\perp $. And we even showed that the inclusion $\mathcal {S}\rightarrow \mathbf {K}(R\text{-}\mathrm {Flat})$ has a right adjoint; this forces some natural map to be an equivalence $\mathbf {K}(R\text{-}\mathrm {Proj})\rightarrow \mathcal {S}^\perp $. In this article we produce a set of cogenerators for $\mathbf {K}(R\text{-}\mathrm {Proj})$. More accurately, this set of cogenerators naturally lies in the equivalent $\mathcal {S}^\perp \cong \mathbf {K}(R\text{-}\mathrm {Proj})$; it can be used to give yet another proof of the fact that the inclusion $\mathcal {S}\rightarrow \mathbf {K}(R\text{-}\mathrm {Flat})$ has a right adjoint. But by now several proofs of this fact already exist.
LA - eng
KW - triangulated categories; generators; cogenerators; flat modules; projective modules
UR - http://eudml.org/doc/272245
ER -

References

top
  1. [1] D. Bravo, E. Enochs, A. Iacob, O. Jenda & J. Rada, Cotorsion pairs in 𝐂 ( R --Mod ) , to appear in Rocky Mountain J. of Math. Zbl1268.18011MR3028763
  2. [2] E. H. J. Brown, Cohomology theories, Ann. of Math.75 (1962), 467–484. Zbl0101.40603MR138104
  3. [3] E. E. Enochs & J. R. García Rozas, Flat covers of complexes, J. Algebra210 (1998), 86–102. Zbl0931.13009MR1656416
  4. [4] S. Iyengar & H. Krause, Acyclicity versus total acyclicity for complexes over Noetherian rings, Doc. Math.11 (2006), 207–240. Zbl1119.13014MR2262932
  5. [5] P. Jørgensen, The homotopy category of complexes of projective modules, Adv. Math.193 (2005), 223–232. Zbl1068.18012MR2132765
  6. [6] H. Krause, A Brown representability theorem via coherent functors, Topology41 (2002), 853–861. Zbl1009.18010MR1905842
  7. [7] H. Krause, The stable derived category of a Noetherian scheme, Compos. Math.141 (2005), 1128–1162. Zbl1090.18006MR2157133
  8. [8] H. Krause, Approximations and adjoints in homotopy categories, preprint arXiv:1005.0209. Zbl1323.18003MR2923949
  9. [9] D. S. Murfet, The mock homotopy category of projectives and Grothendieck duality, Thèse, Australian National Univ., 2008. 
  10. [10] A. Neeman, Brown representability for the dual, Invent. Math.133 (1998), 97–105. Zbl0906.18002MR1626473
  11. [11] A. Neeman, Triangulated categories, Annals of Math. Studies 148, Princeton Univ. Press, 2001. Zbl0974.18008MR1812507
  12. [12] A. Neeman, The homotopy category of flat modules, and Grothendieck duality, Invent. Math.174 (2008), 255–308. Zbl1184.18008MR2439608
  13. [13] A. Neeman, Brown representability follows from Rosický’s theorem, J. Topol.2 (2009), 262–276. Zbl1179.18005MR2529296
  14. [14] A. Neeman, Some adjoints in homotopy categories, Ann. of Math.171 (2010), 2143–2155. Zbl1205.18008MR2680406
  15. [15] J. Rosický, Generalized Brown representability in homotopy categories, Theory Appl. Categ.14 (2005), 451–479. Zbl1091.18002MR2211427
  16. [16] M. Saorín & J. Šťovíček, On exact categories and applications to triangulated adjoints and model structures, preprint arXiv:1005.3248. Zbl1235.18010

NotesEmbed ?

top

You must be logged in to post comments.

To embed these notes on your page include the following JavaScript code on your page where you want the notes to appear.

Only the controls for the widget will be shown in your chosen language. Notes will be shown in their authored language.

Tells the widget how many notes to show per page. You can cycle through additional notes using the next and previous controls.

    
                

Note: Best practice suggests putting the JavaScript code just before the closing </body> tag.