Cooperative versus argumentative communication
Philosophia Scientiae (2004)
- Volume: 8, Issue: 2, page 195-209
- ISSN: 1281-2463
Access Full Article
top
Abstract
topHow to cite
topvan Rooij, Robert. "Cooperative versus argumentative communication." Philosophia Scientiae 8.2 (2004): 195-209. <http://eudml.org/doc/103727>.
@article{vanRooij2004,
abstract = {In pragmatics, the theory of language use, it is standard to assume that communication is a cooperative affair. Recently, this standard view has come under attack by Ducrot and Merin, and it has been proposed that an argumentative view on natural language use is more appropriate. In this paper I discuss to what extent this attack is justified and whether the alternative view can provide a more adequate analysis of ‘pragmatic meaning’, i.e., implicatures.},
author = {van Rooij, Robert},
journal = {Philosophia Scientiae},
language = {eng},
number = {2},
pages = {195-209},
publisher = {Éditions Kimé},
title = {Cooperative versus argumentative communication},
url = {http://eudml.org/doc/103727},
volume = {8},
year = {2004},
}
TY - JOUR
AU - van Rooij, Robert
TI - Cooperative versus argumentative communication
JO - Philosophia Scientiae
PY - 2004
PB - Éditions Kimé
VL - 8
IS - 2
SP - 195
EP - 209
AB - In pragmatics, the theory of language use, it is standard to assume that communication is a cooperative affair. Recently, this standard view has come under attack by Ducrot and Merin, and it has been proposed that an argumentative view on natural language use is more appropriate. In this paper I discuss to what extent this attack is justified and whether the alternative view can provide a more adequate analysis of ‘pragmatic meaning’, i.e., implicatures.
LA - eng
UR - http://eudml.org/doc/103727
ER -
NotesEmbed ?
topYou must be logged in to post comments.
To embed these notes on your page include the following JavaScript code on your page where you want the notes to appear.