Currently displaying 1 – 7 of 7

Showing per page

Order by Relevance | Title | Year of publication

On the Lebesgue-Nagell equation

Andrzej Dąbrowski — 2011

Colloquium Mathematicae

We completely solve the Diophantine equations x ² + 2 a q b = y (for q = 17, 29, 41). We also determine all C = p a p k a k and C = 2 a p a p k a k , where p , . . . , p k are fixed primes satisfying certain conditions. The corresponding Diophantine equations x² + C = yⁿ may be studied by the method used by Abu Muriefah et al. (2008) and Luca and Togbé (2009).

On the Brocard-Ramanujan problem and generalizations

Andrzej Dąbrowski — 2012

Colloquium Mathematicae

Let p i denote the ith prime. We conjecture that there are precisely 28 solutions to the equation n ² - 1 = p α p k α k in positive integers n and α₁,..., α k . This conjecture implies an explicit description of the set of solutions to the Brocard-Ramanujan equation. We also propose another variant of the Brocard-Ramanujan problem: describe the set of solutions in non-negative integers of the equation n! + A = x₁²+x₂²+x₃² (A fixed).

p -adic L -functions of Hilbert modular forms

Andrzej Dabrowski — 1994

Annales de l'institut Fourier

We construct p -adic L -functions (in general case unbounded) attached to “motivic" primitive Hilbert cusp forms as a non-archimedean Mellin transform of the corresponding admissible measure. In order to prove the growth conditions of the appropriate complex-valued distributions we represent them as Rankin type representation and use Atkin–Lehner theory and explicit form of Fourier coefficients of Eisenstein series.

Cubic forms, powers of primes and the Kraus method

Andrzej DąbrowskiTomasz JędrzejakKarolina Krawciów — 2012

Colloquium Mathematicae

We consider the Diophantine equation ( x + y ) ( x ² + B x y + y ² ) = D z p , where B, D are integers (B ≠ ±2, D ≠ 0) and p is a prime >5. We give Kraus type criteria of nonsolvability for this equation (explicitly, for many B and D) in terms of Galois representations and modular forms. We apply these criteria to numerous equations (with B = 0, 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, specific D’s, and p ∈ (10,10⁶)). In the last section we discuss reductions of the above Diophantine equations to those of signature (p,p,2).

Page 1

Download Results (CSV)