Currently displaying 1 – 12 of 12

Showing per page

Order by Relevance | Title | Year of publication

One-Rule Length-Preserving Rewrite Systems and Rational Transductions

Michel LatteuxYves Roos — 2014

RAIRO - Theoretical Informatics and Applications - Informatique Théorique et Applications

We address the problem to know whether the relation induced by a one-rule length-preserving rewrite system is rational. We partially answer to a conjecture of Éric Lilin who conjectured in 1991 that a one-rule length-preserving rewrite system is a rational transduction if and only if the left-hand side and the right-hand side of the rule of the system are not quasi-conjugate or are equal, that means if and are distinct, there do not exist words , and such that  =  and  = . We prove the part...

Minimal NFA and biRFSA languages

Michel LatteuxYves RoosAlain Terlutte — 2009

RAIRO - Theoretical Informatics and Applications - Informatique Théorique et Applications

In this paper, we define the notion of biRFSA which is a residual finate state automaton (RFSA) whose the reverse is also an RFSA. The languages recognized by such automata are called biRFSA languages. We prove that the canonical RFSA of a biRFSA language is a minimal NFA for this language and that each minimal NFA for this language is a sub-automaton of the canonical RFSA. This leads to a characterization of the family of biRFSA languages. In the second part of this paper, we define the family...

Minimal NFA and biRFSA Languages

Michel LatteuxYves RoosAlain Terlutte — 2008

RAIRO - Theoretical Informatics and Applications

In this paper, we define the notion of biRFSA which is a residual finate state automaton (RFSA) whose the reverse is also an RFSA. The languages recognized by such automata are called biRFSA languages. We prove that the canonical RFSA of a biRFSA language is a minimal NFA for this language and that each minimal NFA for this language is a sub-automaton of the canonical RFSA. This leads to a characterization of the family of biRFSA languages. In the second part of this paper, we define the family...

Equality sets for recursively enumerable languages

Vesa HalavaTero HarjuHendrik Jan HoogeboomMichel Latteux — 2005

RAIRO - Theoretical Informatics and Applications - Informatique Théorique et Applications

We consider shifted equality sets of the form E G ( a , g 1 , g 2 ) = { w g 1 ( w ) = a g 2 ( w ) } , where g 1 and g 2 are nonerasing morphisms and a is a letter. We are interested in the family consisting of the languages h ( E G ( J ) ) , where h is a coding and E G ( J ) is a shifted equality set. We prove several closure properties for this family. Moreover, we show that every recursively enumerable language L A * is a projection of a shifted equality set, that is, L = π A ( E G ( a , g 1 , g 2 ) ) for some (nonerasing) morphisms g 1 and g 2 and a letter a , where π A deletes the letters not in A . Then we deduce...

Equality sets for recursively enumerable languages

Vesa HalavaTero HarjuHendrik Jan HoogeboomMichel Latteux — 2010

RAIRO - Theoretical Informatics and Applications

We consider shifted equality sets of the form , where and are nonerasing morphisms and is a letter. We are interested in the family consisting of the languages , where is a coding and is a shifted equality set. We prove several closure properties for this family. Moreover, we show that every recursively enumerable language is a projection of a shifted equality set, that is, for some (nonerasing) morphisms and and a letter...

Page 1

Download Results (CSV)