Displaying 21 – 40 of 475

Showing per page

A note on D-spaces

Shou Lin (2006)

Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae

Every semi-stratifiable space or strong Σ -space has a σ -cushioned (mod k )-network. In this paper it is showed that every space with a σ -cushioned (mod k )-network is a D-space, which is a common generalization of some results about D-spaces.

A note on k-c-semistratifiable spaces and strong β -spaces

Li-Xia Wang, Liang-Xue Peng (2011)

Mathematica Bohemica

Recall that a space X is a c-semistratifiable (CSS) space, if the compact sets of X are G δ -sets in a uniform way. In this note, we introduce another class of spaces, denoting it by k-c-semistratifiable (k-CSS), which generalizes the concept of c-semistratifiable. We discuss some properties of k-c-semistratifiable spaces. We prove that a T 2 -space X is a k-c-semistratifiable space if and only if X has a g function which satisfies the following conditions: (1) For each x X , { x } = { g ( x , n ) : n } and g ( x , n + 1 ) g ( x , n ) for each n . (2) If a...

A note on monotone countable paracompactness

Ge Ying, Chris Good (2001)

Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae

We show that a space is MCP (monotone countable paracompact) if and only if it has property ( * ) , introduced by Teng, Xia and Lin. The relationship between MCP and stratifiability is highlighted by a similar characterization of stratifiability. Using this result, we prove that MCP is preserved by both countably biquotient closed and peripherally countably compact closed mappings, from which it follows that both strongly Fréchet spaces and q-space closed images of MCP spaces are MCP. Some results on...

A note on spaces with countable extent

Yan-Kui Song (2017)

Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae

Let P be a topological property. A space X is said to be star P if whenever 𝒰 is an open cover of X , there exists a subspace A X with property P such that X = S t ( A , 𝒰 ) . In this note, we construct a Tychonoff pseudocompact SCE-space which is not star Lindelöf, which gives a negative answer to a question of Rojas-Sánchez and Tamariz-Mascarúa.

A note on star Lindelöf, first countable and normal spaces

Wei-Feng Xuan (2017)

Mathematica Bohemica

A topological space X is said to be star Lindelöf if for any open cover 𝒰 of X there is a Lindelöf subspace A X such that St ( A , 𝒰 ) = X . The “extent” e ( X ) of X is the supremum of the cardinalities of closed discrete subsets of X . We prove that under V = L every star Lindelöf, first countable and normal space must have countable extent. We also obtain an example under MA + ¬ CH , which shows that a star Lindelöf, first countable and normal space may not have countable extent.

A note on the extent of two subclasses of star countable spaces

Zuoming Yu (2012)

Open Mathematics

We prove that every Tychonoff strongly monotonically monolithic star countable space is Lindelöf, which solves a question posed by O.T. Alas et al. We also use this result to generalize a metrization theorem for strongly monotonically monolithic spaces. At the end of this paper, we study the extent of star countable spaces with k-in-countable bases, k ∈ ℤ.

A note on transitively D -spaces

Liang-Xue Peng (2011)

Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal

In this note, we show that if for any transitive neighborhood assignment φ for X there is a point-countable refinement such that for any non-closed subset A of X there is some V such that | V A | ω , then X is transitively D . As a corollary, if X is a sequential space and has a point-countable w c s * -network then X is transitively D , and hence if X is a Hausdorff k -space and has a point-countable k -network, then X is transitively D . We prove that if X is a countably compact sequential space and has a point-countable...

A proof for the Blair-Hager-Johnson theorem on absolute z -embedding

Kaori Yamazaki (2002)

Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae

In this paper, a simple proof is given for the following theorem due to Blair [7], Blair-Hager [8] and Hager-Johnson [12]: A Tychonoff space X is z -embedded in every larger Tychonoff space if and only if X is almost compact or Lindelöf. We also give a simple proof of a recent theorem of Bella-Yaschenko [6] on absolute embeddings.

A quest for nice kernels of neighbourhood assignments

Raushan Z. Buzyakova, Vladimir Vladimirovich Tkachuk, Richard Gordon Wilson (2007)

Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae

Given a topological property (or a class) 𝒫 , the class 𝒫 * dual to 𝒫 (with respect to neighbourhood assignments) consists of spaces X such that for any neighbourhood assignment { O x : x X } there is Y X with Y 𝒫 and { O x : x Y } = X . The spaces from 𝒫 * are called dually 𝒫 . We continue the study of this duality which constitutes a development of an idea of E. van Douwen used to define D -spaces. We prove a number of results on duals of some general classes of spaces establishing, in particular, that any generalized ordered space...

A semifilter approach to selection principles

Lubomyr Zdomsky (2005)

Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae

In this paper we develop the semifilter approach to the classical Menger and Hurewicz properties and show that the small cardinal 𝔤 is a lower bound of the additivity number of the σ -ideal generated by Menger subspaces of the Baire space, and under 𝔲 < 𝔤 every subset X of the real line with the property Split ( Λ , Λ ) is Hurewicz, and thus it is consistent with ZFC that the property Split ( Λ , Λ ) is preserved by unions of less than 𝔟 subsets of the real line.

A semifilter approach to selection principles II: τ * -covers

Lubomyr Zdomsky (2006)

Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae

Developing the idea of assigning to a large cover of a topological space a corresponding semifilter, we show that every Menger topological space has the property fin ( 𝒪 , T * ) provided ( 𝔲 < 𝔤 ) , and every space with the property fin ( 𝒪 , T * ) is Hurewicz provided ( Depth + ( [ ω ] 0 ) 𝔟 ) . Combining this with the results proven in cited literature, we settle all questions whether (it is consistent that) the properties P and Q [do not] coincide, where P and Q run over fin ( 𝒪 , Γ ) , fin ( 𝒪 , T ) , fin ( 𝒪 , T * ) , fin ( 𝒪 , Ω ) , and fin ( 𝒪 , 𝒪 ) .

Currently displaying 21 – 40 of 475