Die logische Kompetenz und die Theorie der mentalen Modelle

Shahid Rahman; Narahari Rao

Philosophia Scientiae (2000)

  • Volume: 4, Issue: 2, page 133-146
  • ISSN: 1281-2463

How to cite


Rahman, Shahid, and Rao, Narahari. "Die logische Kompetenz und die Theorie der mentalen Modelle." Philosophia Scientiae 4.2 (2000): 133-146. <http://eudml.org/doc/103645>.

author = {Rahman, Shahid, Rao, Narahari},
journal = {Philosophia Scientiae},
language = {ger},
number = {2},
pages = {133-146},
publisher = {Éditions Kimé},
title = {Die logische Kompetenz und die Theorie der mentalen Modelle},
url = {http://eudml.org/doc/103645},
volume = {4},
year = {2000},

AU - Rahman, Shahid
AU - Rao, Narahari
TI - Die logische Kompetenz und die Theorie der mentalen Modelle
JO - Philosophia Scientiae
PY - 2000
PB - Éditions Kimé
VL - 4
IS - 2
SP - 133
EP - 146
LA - ger
UR - http://eudml.org/doc/103645
ER -


  1. [1] Bracewell, R. J. und Hidi, S. E.1974.— The solution of an inferential problem as a function of stimulus materials. In: Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 26, S. 480–488. 
  2. [2] Braine, M. D. S.1978.— On the relationship between the natural logic of reasoning and standard logic. In: Psychological Review, 85, S. 1–21. 
  3. [3] Braine, M. D. S. und Rumain, B.1983.— Logical reasoning. In: Flavell/Markman [ 1983 ] , Vol. III. 
  4. [4] Byrne, R. M. J.1989a.— Everyday reasoning with conditional sequences. In: Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41A, S. 141–166. 
  5. [5] Byrne, R. M. J.1989b.— Suppressing valid inferences with conditionals. In: Cognition 31, S. 61–83. 
  6. [6] Cheng, P. W. and Holyoak, K. J.1985.— Pragmatic reasoning schemas. In: Psychological Review 17, S. 391–416. (editor) 
  7. [7] Evans, J. St. B. T.1983.— Thinking and reasoning: Psychological approaches, London. 
  8. [8] Evans, J. St. B. T.1984.— Heuristic and analytic processes in reasoning. In: British Journal of Psychology, 75, S. 451–458. 
  9. [9] Evans, J. St. B. T.1989.— Bias in human reasoning, London. 
  10. [10] Evans, J. St. B. T. und Lynch, L. S.1973.— Matching bias in the selection task. In: British Journal of Psychology, 64, S. 391–397. 
  11. [11] Eysenck, M. W. und Keane, Mark T. 1992.— Cognitive Psychology, London. (editors) 
  12. [12] Flavell, J. H. und Markman, E. M.1983.— Handbook of child psychology, New York (4th.edition) 
  13. [13] Fodor, J. A.1983.— The modularity of mind, Cambridge, Massachussetts. 
  14. [14] Gilhooly, K. J. und Falconer, W.1974.— Concrete and abstract terms and relations in testing a rule. In: Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 26, S. 355–359. 
  15. [15] Griggs, R. A.1983.— The role of problem content in the selection task and THOG problem. In: Evans [ 1983 ]
  16. [16] Griggs, R. A. und Cox, J. R.1982.— The elusive thematic-material effect in Wason’s selection task. In: British Journal of Experimental Psychology 73, S. 407–420. 
  17. [17] Inder, R.1987.— Computer simulation of syllogism solving using restricted mental models, Edinburgh. 
  18. [18] Johnson-Laird, P. N.1975.— Models of deduction. In: R. J. Falmagne (Ed.): Reasoning: Representation and process in children and adults, Hillsdale. 
  19. [19] Johnson-Laird, P. N.1983.— Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference and consciousness, Cambridge. 
  20. [20] Johnson-Laird, P. N. und Byrne, Ruth M. J. 1991.— Deduction, London. 
  21. [21] Lorenz, Kuno1996.— Artikulation und Prädikation. In: M. Dascal, D. Gerhardus, K. Lorenz, G. Meggle (Hg.), Sprachphilosophie. Berlin, New York, Bd. 2. 1098–1122. 
  22. [22] Lorenz, Kuno und Lorenzen, Paul1978.— Dialogische Logik. Darmstadt. Zbl0435.03011
  23. [23] Macnamara, J.1986.— A border dispute: The place of logic in psychology, Cambridge Massachussetts. 
  24. [24] Polk, T. A. und Newell, A.1988.— Modeling human syllogistic reasoning in Soar, in: Tenth annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Hillsdale. 
  25. [25] Rahman, S.1998a.— Die Logik der zusammenhängenden Sätze im Werk von Hugh MacColl. Habilitationsschrift. Erscheint bei Birkhäuser voraussichtlich 2000. 
  26. [26] Rahman, S.1998b.— Redundanz und Wahrheitswertbestimmung bei Hugh MacColl. Erscheint in: Nordic Journal of Philosophical Logic. 
  27. [27] Rahman, S. und Rückert, H.1997.— Die pragmatischen Sinn- und Geltungskriterien der Dialogischen Logik beim Beweis des Adjunktionssatzes. FR 5.1, Memo 14. Auch in: Philosophia Scientiae 3(3), 1999, 145–170. 
  28. [28] Rips, L. J.1983.— Cognitive processes in propositional reasoning. In: Psychological Review 90, S. 38–71. (editors) 
  29. [29] Rose, H. E. und Shepherdson, J.C.1975.— Logic Colloquium 73, Amsterdam. Zbl0299.00011
  30. [30] Rumain, B., Connell, J. und Braine, M. D. S.1984.— Conversational comprehension processes are responsible for reasoning fallacies in children as well as adults: IF is not the biconditional. In: Developmental Psychology 19, S. 471–481. 
  31. [31] Wason, P. C. und Johnson-Laird, P. N.1972.— The psychology of reasoning: Structure and content, Cambridge Massachussets. 

NotesEmbed ?


You must be logged in to post comments.

To embed these notes on your page include the following JavaScript code on your page where you want the notes to appear.

Only the controls for the widget will be shown in your chosen language. Notes will be shown in their authored language.

Tells the widget how many notes to show per page. You can cycle through additional notes using the next and previous controls.


Note: Best practice suggests putting the JavaScript code just before the closing </body> tag.