Rhematische Graphen : Über Peirce’ Theorien der diagrammatischen Nachbildung von Propositionen

Constantin von Pückler

Philosophia Scientiae (2000)

  • Volume: 4, Issue: 2, page 67-131
  • ISSN: 1281-2463

Abstract

top
Now that research of AI has begun to concentrate itself on the formal qualities of conceptual structures, Charles Peirce’s confidence of having designed the logic of the future with his theory of Existential Graphs (EG) seems to be finally justified. The following presents the “Rhematical Graphs” (RG) as the categorical foundation of EG and puts them in line with semiotics resting on the logic of relations. RG depict indecomposable predicates and their connections by lines of identity. Among the latter, one can distinguish between extensive, reflective, recursive and diminuitive modes. By means of reconstructing two examples Peirce discussed to establish his thesis of the elementarity of triadic relations the potential and limitations of RG will be judged.

How to cite

top

von Pückler, Constantin. "Rhematische Graphen : Über Peirce’ Theorien der diagrammatischen Nachbildung von Propositionen." Philosophia Scientiae 4.2 (2000): 67-131. <http://eudml.org/doc/103650>.

@article{vonPückler2000,
author = {von Pückler, Constantin},
journal = {Philosophia Scientiae},
language = {ger},
number = {2},
pages = {67-131},
publisher = {Éditions Kimé},
title = {Rhematische Graphen : Über Peirce’ Theorien der diagrammatischen Nachbildung von Propositionen},
url = {http://eudml.org/doc/103650},
volume = {4},
year = {2000},
}

TY - JOUR
AU - von Pückler, Constantin
TI - Rhematische Graphen : Über Peirce’ Theorien der diagrammatischen Nachbildung von Propositionen
JO - Philosophia Scientiae
PY - 2000
PB - Éditions Kimé
VL - 4
IS - 2
SP - 67
EP - 131
LA - ger
UR - http://eudml.org/doc/103650
ER -

References

top
  1. [1] Allwein, G./Barwise, J. (Eds.) 1996.— Logical Reasoning with Diagrams. New York. MR1408436
  2. [2] Arnauld, Antoine1662.— Die Logik oder die Kunst des Denkens. Darmstadt. 
  3. [3] Barwise, Jon/Etchemedy, John 1991.— Visual Information and Valid Reasoning. In : Allwein, G./Barwise, J. (Eds.) 1996, 49–78. MR1408437
  4. [4] Benedict, George A.1985.— What are Representamens ? Transactions of the Charles Sanders Peirce Society 21, 243–270. 
  5. [5] Biggs, Norman L./Lloyd, E. Keith/Wilson, Robin J. (Eds.) 1976.— Graph Theory 1736 — 1936. Oxford. MR444418
  6. [6] Burch, Robert W.1991a.— A Peircean Reduction Thesis. The Foundations of Topological Logic. Lubbock. MR1174291
  7. [7] Burch, Robert W.1991b.— Valency, Adicity, and Adity in Peirce’s MS 482. Transactions of the Charles Sanders Peirce Society 27, 237–244. 
  8. [8] Burch, Robert W.1994.— Die logischen Operationen in Peirce’ „Beschreibung einer Notation für die Logik der Relative“. In : Pape, H. (Hg.), Kreativität und Logik. Charles S. Peirce und das philosophische Problem des Neuen. Frankfurt/M., 77–113. 
  9. [9] Chandrasekaran, B./Glasgow, J./Hari Narayanan, N. (Eds.) 1995.— Diagrammatic Reasoning. Cognitive and Computational Perspectives. Menlo Park. 
  10. [10] Christopherson, Rosemarie/Johnstone, Jr., Henry W. 1981.— Triadicity and Thirdness. Transactions of the Charles Sanders Peirce Society 17, 241–246. 
  11. [11] Dougherty, William P.1993.— The Play of Interpretants : A Peircean Approach to Beethoven’s Lieder. In : Shapiro, M. (Ed.), The Peirce Seminar Papers. An Annual of Semiotic Analysis, Vol. 1. Providence, 67–95. 
  12. [12] Esposito, Joseph L.1980.— Evolutionary Metaphysics : The Development of Peirce’s Theory of Categories. Athens. 
  13. [13] Euler, Leonhard1761.— Briefe an eine deutsche Prinzessin über verschiedene Gegenstände aus der Physik und Philosophie. Braunschweig. Zbl0616.01020
  14. [14] Faris, J.A.1981.— C.S. Peirce’s Existential Graphs. Bulletin of the Institute of Mathematics and its Applications 17, 226–233. Zbl0519.03004MR654750
  15. [15] Feibleman, James K.1946.— An Introduction to Peirce’s Philosophy, Interpreted as a System. London. MR122674
  16. [16] Ferrater Mora, José1955.— Peirce’s Conception of Architectonic and Related Views. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 15, 351–359. 
  17. [17] Fisch, Max/Turquette, Atwell 1966.— Peirce’s Triadic Logic. Transactions of the Charles Sanders Peirce Society 2, 71–85. MR209125
  18. [18] Frege, Gottlob1879.— Begriffsschrift. Eine der arithmetischen nachgebildete Formelsprache des Denkens. 2. Auflage, hg. v. Ignacio Angelelli. Hildesheim 1964. 
  19. [19] Frege, Gottlob1892.— Über Begriff und Gegenstand. In : Frege : Funktion, Begriff, Bedeutung. Fünf logische Studien, hg. v. G. Patzig. Göttingen 1962, 66–80. 
  20. [20] Ganter, Bernhard/Wille, Rudolf 1996.— Formale Begriffsanalyse. Berlin. MR1715047
  21. [21] Gardner, Martin1958.— Logic Machines and Diagrams. New York. Zbl0082.33701
  22. [22] Greenlee, Douglas1968.— Peirce’s Hypostatic and Factorial Categories. Transactions of the Charles Sanders Peirce Society 4, 49–58. 
  23. [23] Hawkins, Benjamin S.1981.— Peirce’s and Frege’s Systems of Notation. In : Ketner, K.L./Ransdell, J.M./Eisele, C./Fisch, M.H./Hardwick, C.S. (Eds.) : Proceedings of the C.S. Peirce Bicentennial International Congress. Lubbock, 381–390. 
  24. [24] Herzberger, Hans1981.— Peirce’s Remarkable Theorem. In : Slater, J./Wilson, T./Sumner, T. (Eds.) : Pragmatism and Purpose : Essays Presented to Thomas A. Goudge. Toronto, 41–58. 
  25. [25] Hookway, Christopher1985.— Peirce. London. (Eds.) 
  26. [26] Houser, N./Roberts, D.D./Van Evra, J. 1997.— Studies in the Logic of Charles Sanders Peirce. Bloomington. 
  27. [27] Kant, Immanuel1781.— Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Werke in 12 Bänden, hg. v. Wilhelm Weischedel, Bd. III und IV. Frankfurt/M. 1974. 
  28. [28] Kempe, Arthur1886.— Memoir on the Theory of Mathematical Form. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1–70. 
  29. [29] Kent, Beverly1987.— C.S. Peirce — Logic and the Classification of the Sciences. Kingston. 
  30. [30] Ketner, Kenneth Laine1981.— The Best Example of Semiosis and Its Use in Teaching Semiotics. American Journal of Semiotics 1, 47–83. 
  31. [31] Ketner, Kenneth Laine1986a.— Peirce’s „Most Lucid and Interesting Paper“ : An Intoduction to Cenopythagoreanism. International Philosophical Quarterly 26, 375–392. 
  32. [32] Ketner, Kenneth Laine1986b.— Semiotic is an Observational Science. See for yourself : Developing Skills with Part of Peirce’s Beta Existential Graphs. In : Bouissac, P./Herzfeld, M./Posner, R. (Eds.) : Iconicity. Essays on the Nature of Culture. Festschrift for Thomas A. Seboek on his 65 th Birthday. Tübingen,75–94. 
  33. [33] Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm1687.— Brief an Antoine Arnauld, September 1687. In : Hauptschriften zur Grundlegung der Philosophie, hg. v. E. Cassirer. 2 Bde., Hamburg 1966, Bd. 2, 232ff. 
  34. [34] Lieb, Irvin C.1953.— On Peirce’s Classifications of Signs. In : S&S 160–166. 
  35. [35] Locke, John1690.— Versuch über den menschlichen Verstand. 2 Bde., Hamburg 1981. 
  36. [36] McCarthy, Jeremiah E.1984.— Semiotic Idealism. Transactions of the Charles Sanders Peirce Society 20, 394–433. 
  37. [37] Mertz, Donald W.1979.— Peirce : Logic, Categories, and Triads. Transactions of the Charles Sanders Peirce Society 15, 158–175. 
  38. [38] Müller, Ralf1999.— Die dynamische Logik des Erkennens von Charles S. Peirce. Würzburg. Zbl0934.01004
  39. [39] Murphey, Murray G.1961.— The Development of Peirce’s Thought. Cambridge/Mass.. 
  40. [40] Nagl, Ludwig1992.— Charles Sanders Peirce. Frankfurt/M.. (Eds.) 
  41. [41] Nagle, T.E./Nagle, J.A./Gerholz, L.L./Eklund, P.W. 1992.— Conceptual Structures. Current research and Practice. New York. 
  42. [42] Ogden, Charles Kay/Richards, Ivor Armstrong 1923.— Die Bedeutung von Bedeutung. Eine Untersuchung über den Einfluß der Sprache auf das Denken und über die Wissenschaft des Symbolismus. Frankfurt/M. 1974. 
  43. [43] Peano, Guiseppe1891.— The Principles of Mathematical Logic. In : Peano : Selected Writings, ed. by H.C. Kennedy. Toronto 1973, 153–161. 
  44. [44] Peirce, Charles Sanders CP.— Collected Papers, Vol. I-VI, ed. by Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss (Cambridge/Mass. 1931ff) ; Vol. VII-VIII, ed. by Arthur W. Burks (Cambridge/Mass. 1958). MR110632
  45. [45] Peirce, Charles Sanders FÜ.— Die Festigung der Überzeugung und andere Schriften, hg. v. Elisabeth Walther. Baden-Baden o.J. 
  46. [46] Peirce, Charles Sanders SLM.— Zur semiotischen Grundlegung von Logik und Mathematik. Unpublizierte Manuskripte, hg. v. Max Bense und Elisabeth Walther. Stuttgart 1976. 
  47. [47] Peirce, Charles Sanders SPP.— Schriften zum Pragmatismus und Pragmatizismus, hg. v. Karl-Otto Apel. Frankfurt/M. 1976. 
  48. [48] Peirce, Charles Sanders NEM.— The New Elements of Mathematics, ed. by Carolyn Eisele. 4 Vols., The Hague 1976 
  49. [49] Peirce, Charles Sanders S&S.— Semiotic and Significs. The Correspondence between Charles S. Peirce and Victoria Lady Welby, ed. by Charles S. Hardwick. Bloomington 1977. 
  50. [50] Peirce, Charles Sanders CE.— Writings of Charles S. Peirce. A Chronological Edition, ed. by the Peirce Edition Project. 5 Vols., Bloomington 1982ff. 
  51. [51] Peirce, Charles Sanders PLZ.— Phänomen und Logik der Zeichen, hg. v. Helmut Pape. Frankfurt/M. 1983 
  52. [52] Peirce, Charles Sanders SS.— Semiotische Schriften, hg. v. Christian W. Kloesel und Helmut Pape. 3 Bde., Frankfurt/M. 1986ff. 
  53. [53] Peirce, Charles Sanders VP.— Vorlesungen über Pragmatismus, hg. v. Elisabeth Walther. Hamburg 1991 
  54. [54] Peirce, Charles Sanders NZ.— Naturordnung und Zeichenprozeß. Schriften über Semiotik und Naturphilosophie, hg. v. Helmut Pape. Frankfurt/M. 1991. 
  55. [55] Pfeiffer, H.D./Nagle, T.E. (Eds.) 1993.— Conceptual Structures : Theory and Implementation. Annual Workshop, Las Cruces, NM, USA, July 8-10, 1992. Berlin. Zbl0875.00105
  56. [56] Potter, Vincent G./Shields, Paul B. 1977.— Peirce’s Definitions of Continuities. Transactions of the Charles Sanders Peirce Society 13, 3–22. 
  57. [57] Putnam, Hilary1982.— Peirce the Logician. Historia Mathematica 9, 290–301. Zbl0487.01012MR667601
  58. [58] Quine, Willard Van Orman1954.— Reduction to a Dyadic Predicate. In : Selected Logical Papers. New York 1966, 224ff. Zbl1098.03005
  59. [59] Roberts, Don D.1973.— The Existential Graphs of Charles S. Peirce. The Hague. MR497852
  60. [60] Roberts, Don D.1997.— A Decision Method for Existential Graphs. In : Houser et. al (Eds.), 387–401. MR1720843
  61. [61] Robin, Richard S.1967.— Annotated Catalogue of the Papers of Charles S. Peirce. Cambridge/ Mass. (= MS). MR218185
  62. [62] Sanders, Gary1970.— Peirce’s Sixty-Six Signs ? Transactions of the Charles Sanders Peirce Society 6, 3–16. 
  63. [63] Schönrich, Gerhard1999.— Semiotik zur Einführung. Hamburg. 
  64. [64] Sheriff, John K.1994.— Charles Peirce’s Guess at the Riddle : Grounds for Human Significance. Bloomington. 
  65. [65] Shin, Sun-Joo1994.— The Logical Status of Diagrams. Cambridge/Mass. Zbl0829.03002MR1312613
  66. [66] Sowa, John F.1984.— Conceptual Structures. Information Processing in Mind and Machine. Reading. Zbl0536.68077MR709597
  67. [67] Sowa, John F.1997.— Matching Logical Structure to Linguistic Structure. In : Houser et al. (Eds.), 418–444. MR1720845
  68. [68] Spinks, Carl W.1991.— Peirce and Triadomania. A Walk in the Semiotic Wilderness. Berlin. 
  69. [69] Tepfenhart, W. M./Dick, J. P./Sowa, J. F. (Eds.) 1994.— Conceptual Structures : Current Practices. Second International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS ’94. College Park, Maryland, USA, August 1994. Berlin. Zbl0849.00037
  70. [70] Thibaud, Pierre1975.— La Logique de Charles Sanders Peirce. De l’Algèbre aux Graphes. Aix-en-Provence. 
  71. [71] Tienne, André de1992.— Peirce’s Semiotic Monism. In : Balat, M./Deledalle-Rhodes, J. (Eds.) : Signs of Humanity. L’homme et ses signes. Proceedings of the IVth International Association of Semiotic Studies, Barcelona/Perpignan, March 30-April 6, 1989. Berlin, Vol. 3, 1291–1298. 
  72. [72] Tienne, André de1993.— Peirce’s Definitions of the Phaneron. In : Moore, E.C. (Ed.) : Charles S. Peirce and the Philosophy of Science. Papers from the Harvard Sesquicentennial Congress. Tuscaloosa, 279–288. 
  73. [73] Walther, Elisabeth1974.— Allgemeine Zeichenlehre. Einführung in die Grundlagen der Semiotik. Stuttgart. 
  74. [74] Walther, Elisabeth1989.— Charles Sanders Peirce : Leben und Werk. Baden-Baden. 
  75. [75] Zeman, J.Jay1964.— Existential Graphs and Natural Deduction. In : Moore, E.C./Robin, R.S. (Eds.) : The Philosophy of Charles Sanders Peirce, Second Series. Amherst 1964, 109–121. 
  76. [76] Zeman, J.Jay 1967.— A System of Implicit Quantification. Journal of Symbolic Logic 32, 484–509. Zbl0175.26102MR225632
  77. [77] Zeman, J.Jay1968.— Peirce’s Graphs : The Continuity Interpretation. Transactions of the Charles Sanders Peirce Society 4, 144–154. 

NotesEmbed ?

top

You must be logged in to post comments.

To embed these notes on your page include the following JavaScript code on your page where you want the notes to appear.

Only the controls for the widget will be shown in your chosen language. Notes will be shown in their authored language.

Tells the widget how many notes to show per page. You can cycle through additional notes using the next and previous controls.

    
                

Note: Best practice suggests putting the JavaScript code just before the closing </body> tag.