Characterizing incommensurability on the basis of a contextual theory of language

Léna Soler

Philosophia Scientiae (2004)

  • Volume: 8, Issue: 1, page 107-152
  • ISSN: 1281-2463

Abstract

top
In this article I present, first, a criticism of certain aspects of the way Martin Carrier characterizes semantic incommensurability on the basis of a contextual theory of language. Subsequently I introduce some distinctions and put forward some proposals in order to pursue the same project. It will be argued that two different conceptions of the notion “conditions of applications” and, correlatively, two different meanings of the clause “preservations of the inferential relations”, are involved in Carrier’s characterisation, and that his central tenet holds only thanks to the corresponding meaning-shifts. According to Carrier’s thesis, the incommensurable concepts are those that are untranslatable in the following specific sense: they have either the same conditions of application or the same inferential relations, but they never satisfy both determinants at the same time. I suggest to replace this thesis by a characterisation that, from a methodological point of view, grants logical priority to the inferential relations. This characterisation is mainly based: on one side on the Kuhnian claim that the incommensurable concepts are those who have largely non superimposable inferential relations; on the other side on an analysis of the links between inferential relations and conditions of application, particularly on a reflection concerning the conditions under which some inferential relations can and should be equated with conditions of application.

How to cite

top

Soler, Léna. "Characterizing incommensurability on the basis of a contextual theory of language." Philosophia Scientiae 8.1 (2004): 107-152. <http://eudml.org/doc/103710>.

@article{Soler2004,
abstract = {In this article I present, first, a criticism of certain aspects of the way Martin Carrier characterizes semantic incommensurability on the basis of a contextual theory of language. Subsequently I introduce some distinctions and put forward some proposals in order to pursue the same project. It will be argued that two different conceptions of the notion “conditions of applications” and, correlatively, two different meanings of the clause “preservations of the inferential relations”, are involved in Carrier’s characterisation, and that his central tenet holds only thanks to the corresponding meaning-shifts. According to Carrier’s thesis, the incommensurable concepts are those that are untranslatable in the following specific sense: they have either the same conditions of application or the same inferential relations, but they never satisfy both determinants at the same time. I suggest to replace this thesis by a characterisation that, from a methodological point of view, grants logical priority to the inferential relations. This characterisation is mainly based: on one side on the Kuhnian claim that the incommensurable concepts are those who have largely non superimposable inferential relations; on the other side on an analysis of the links between inferential relations and conditions of application, particularly on a reflection concerning the conditions under which some inferential relations can and should be equated with conditions of application.},
author = {Soler, Léna},
journal = {Philosophia Scientiae},
language = {eng},
number = {1},
pages = {107-152},
publisher = {Éditions Kimé},
title = {Characterizing incommensurability on the basis of a contextual theory of language},
url = {http://eudml.org/doc/103710},
volume = {8},
year = {2004},
}

TY - JOUR
AU - Soler, Léna
TI - Characterizing incommensurability on the basis of a contextual theory of language
JO - Philosophia Scientiae
PY - 2004
PB - Éditions Kimé
VL - 8
IS - 1
SP - 107
EP - 152
AB - In this article I present, first, a criticism of certain aspects of the way Martin Carrier characterizes semantic incommensurability on the basis of a contextual theory of language. Subsequently I introduce some distinctions and put forward some proposals in order to pursue the same project. It will be argued that two different conceptions of the notion “conditions of applications” and, correlatively, two different meanings of the clause “preservations of the inferential relations”, are involved in Carrier’s characterisation, and that his central tenet holds only thanks to the corresponding meaning-shifts. According to Carrier’s thesis, the incommensurable concepts are those that are untranslatable in the following specific sense: they have either the same conditions of application or the same inferential relations, but they never satisfy both determinants at the same time. I suggest to replace this thesis by a characterisation that, from a methodological point of view, grants logical priority to the inferential relations. This characterisation is mainly based: on one side on the Kuhnian claim that the incommensurable concepts are those who have largely non superimposable inferential relations; on the other side on an analysis of the links between inferential relations and conditions of application, particularly on a reflection concerning the conditions under which some inferential relations can and should be equated with conditions of application.
LA - eng
UR - http://eudml.org/doc/103710
ER -

NotesEmbed ?

top

You must be logged in to post comments.

To embed these notes on your page include the following JavaScript code on your page where you want the notes to appear.

Only the controls for the widget will be shown in your chosen language. Notes will be shown in their authored language.

Tells the widget how many notes to show per page. You can cycle through additional notes using the next and previous controls.

    
                

Note: Best practice suggests putting the JavaScript code just before the closing </body> tag.