On the grammatical aspects of radical scientific discovery
Philosophia Scientiae (2004)
- Volume: 8, Issue: 1, page 169-201
- ISSN: 1281-2463
Access Full Article
topAbstract
topHow to cite
topBaltas, Aristides. "On the grammatical aspects of radical scientific discovery." Philosophia Scientiae 8.1 (2004): 169-201. <http://eudml.org/doc/103712>.
@article{Baltas2004,
abstract = {Radical scientific discovery and the associated radical “paradigm change” are treated here as following from the disclosure of what I call background ‘assumptions’. These are taken as more or less equivalent to the “hinge propositions” that Wittgenstein discusses in his On Certainty. On this basis, various issues connected to meaning variance, theory change, incommensurability and so forth, are discussed. It is shown that Kuhn’s overall account need not, with qualifications, imply either idealism or relativism while rationality and scientific progress can be saved in a way that may be acceptable by practising scientists.},
author = {Baltas, Aristides},
journal = {Philosophia Scientiae},
language = {eng},
number = {1},
pages = {169-201},
publisher = {Éditions Kimé},
title = {On the grammatical aspects of radical scientific discovery},
url = {http://eudml.org/doc/103712},
volume = {8},
year = {2004},
}
TY - JOUR
AU - Baltas, Aristides
TI - On the grammatical aspects of radical scientific discovery
JO - Philosophia Scientiae
PY - 2004
PB - Éditions Kimé
VL - 8
IS - 1
SP - 169
EP - 201
AB - Radical scientific discovery and the associated radical “paradigm change” are treated here as following from the disclosure of what I call background ‘assumptions’. These are taken as more or less equivalent to the “hinge propositions” that Wittgenstein discusses in his On Certainty. On this basis, various issues connected to meaning variance, theory change, incommensurability and so forth, are discussed. It is shown that Kuhn’s overall account need not, with qualifications, imply either idealism or relativism while rationality and scientific progress can be saved in a way that may be acceptable by practising scientists.
LA - eng
UR - http://eudml.org/doc/103712
ER -
References
top- [1] Agazzi, E. (editor) 1997.— Realism and Quantum Physics, Amsterdam-Atlanta, Georgia: Rodopi. Zbl0924.03004MR1652431
- [2] Batens, D. and van Bendegem, J.P. (editors) 1988.— Theory and Experiment, Recent Insights and New Perspectives on their Relation, Dordrecht, Holland: Reidel Publishing Co.
- [3] Baltas, Aristides1988.— On the Structure of Physics as a Science, in [Batens van Bendegem 1988, 207-226.
- [4] Baltas, Aristides1990.— Once Again on the Meaning of Physical Concepts, in [Nicolacopoulos 1990, 293-314.
- [5] Baltas, Aristides1997.— Constraints and Resistance: Stating a Case for Negative Realism, in [Agazzi 1997, 74-96. MR1652435
- [6] Baltas, Aristides2000.— Classifying Scientific Controversies, in [Machamer, Pera Baltas 2000, 40-49. In
- [7] Baltas, Aristides progress.— Physics as Self-Historiography in Actu: Identity Conditions for the Discipline. Draft available on request.
- [8] Crary, A. and Read, R. (editors) 2000.— The New Wittgenstein, London and New York: Routledge.
- [9] Damerow, P., Freudenthal G., McLaughlin P. and Renn J.1992.— Exploring the Limits of Pre-classical Mechanics, New York: Springer-Verlag.
- [10] Earman, J.1989.— World Enough and Space-Time, Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press. MR1031472
- [11] Gavroglu, K. and Goudaroulis, G.1989.— Concepts out of Context(s): The Development of Low Temperature Physics 18811957, Dordrecht, Holland: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. 2004,
- [12] Kindi, Vasso forthcoming.— Kuhn and Wittgenstein: Philosophical Investigations on the Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago, Ill.: Chicago University Press.
- [13] Kuhn, T. S.1978.— Black Body Theory and the Quantum Discontinuity 1894-1912, Chicago, Ill.: The University of Chicago Press, 1978. MR571012
- [14] Kuhn, T. S.1981.— What are Scientific Revolutions?, in [Kuhn 2000, 13-32.
- [15] Kuhn, T. S.1983.— Commensurability, Compatibility, Communicability, in [Kuhn 2000, 33-57.
- [16] Kuhn, T. S.2000.— Thomas S. Kuhn, the Road since Structure, Conant J. and Haugeland J. (editors), Chicago, Ill.: Chicago University Press.
- [17] Lakatos, Imre1976.— Proofs and Refutations, Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. Zbl0334.00022MR479916
- [18] Machamer P., Pera M. and Baltas A. (editors) 2000.— Scientific Controversies, Oxford, U.K.: The Oxford University Press.
- [19] McDowell, J.1996.— Mind and World, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
- [20] Morawetz, T.1980.— Wittgenstein and Knowledge, Sussex, U. K.: The Harvester Press.
- [21] Nasio, J.-D.1992.— Cinq Leçons sur la Théorie de Jacques Lacan, Paris, France: Rivages.
- [22] Nicolacopoulos, P. (editor) 1990.— Greek Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 2004
- [23] Pagondiotis, K. (forthcoming).— Can the Perceptual be Conceptual and Non-Theory-Laden?, in [Raftopoulos 2004.
- [24] Pera, Marcel1994.— The Discourses of Science, Chicago, Ill.: Chicago University Press.
- [25] Putnam, Hilary2000.— Rethinking Mathematical Necessity, in [Crary Read 2000, 218-231. 2004
- [26] Raftopoulos, A. (editor) (forthcoming).— Cognitive Penetrability of Perception: an Interdisciplinary Approach, New York: Nova Scotia Publishing Co.
- [27] Weiner, J.1990.— Frege in Perspective, Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press. Zbl0937.03500MR1115212
- [28] Wittgenstein Ludwig 1969.— On Certainty, G.E.M. Anscombe and G.H. von Wright (editors), New York: Harper and Row Publishers.
NotesEmbed ?
topTo embed these notes on your page include the following JavaScript code on your page where you want the notes to appear.