Les essais biologiques

 Access to full text

 Full (PDF)

1. D.J. Finney - Statistical Method in Biological Assay. Ch. Griffin - London - Second Edition - 1964. 
2. D.J. Finney - Probit Analysis. Cambridge University Press - Second Edition - 1952 Zbl0047.12802MR347013
3. C.I. Bliss - The Statistics of Bioassay. Academic Press Inc. - New-York - 1952 
4. M.G. Kendall - The Advanced Theory of Statistics. Ch. Griffin - London - Second Edition - 1963. 
5. D. Schwartz - Méthodes Statistiques à l'usage des Médecins et des Biologistes - Ed. Médicales Flammarion - Paris - 1963. 
6. J. Lellouch et P. Lazar - Méthodes générales de l'expérimentation Cours polycopié du C.E.S.A.M. (Institut de Statistique de l'Université de Paris) 
7. P. Lazar et J. Lellouch - Application à la pharmacodynamie et à la microbiologie. Cours polycopié du C.E.S.A.M. (Institut de Statistique de l'Université de Paris). 
8. W.G. Cochran et G.M. Cox - Experimental Designs. John Wiley and Sons - New-York - Second Edition - 1957. Zbl0077.13205MR85682
9. D.R. Cox - Planning of Experiments. John Wiley and Sons - New-York-1958. Zbl0084.15802MR95561
10. J. Berkson - Maximum Likelihood and Minimum Estimates of the Logistic Function. J.A.S.A. Vol. 50, March 1955. 
11. J. Berkson - A Statistically Precise and Relatively Simple Method of Estimating the Bio-Assay with Quantal Response, Based on the Logistic Function. J.A.S.A. Vol. 48, September 1953. Zbl0051.11005
12. J. Cornfield - Comparative Bioassays and the Role of ParallelismJ. of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Vol 144 May 1964. 
13. J. Cornfield et N. Mantel - Some New Aspects of the Application of Maximum Likelihood to the Calculation of the Dosage Response Curve, J.A.S.A. Vol. 45, June 1950. Zbl0040.22604
14. D.J. Finney - The Meaning of Bioassay. Biometric Society, Vol. 21, December 1965. 
15. E.K. Harris - Confidence Limits for the LD Using the Moving Averageangle Method. Biometric Society, Vol. 15, September 1959. Zbl0092.37202
16. P.S. Hewlett et R.L. Plackett - The Relation Between Quantal and Graded Responses to Drugs. Biometrics, March 1956. 
17. J.T. Lit Chfield et F. Wilcoxon - A simplified Method of Evaluating Dose-effect Experiments. J. of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics - Vol. 96, June 1949. 
18. B.L. Marks - Some Optimal Sequential Schemes for Estimating the Mean of a Cumulative Normal Quantal Response Curve. J. of the Royal Statistical Society, Vol. 24, 1962. Zbl0109.36902
19. J. Ulmo - Détermination Expérimentale de la Courbe Représentant les Variations, en Fonction d'un Paramètre, de la Probabilité d'un Phénomène se traduisant par une Alternative, quand celle-ci est une "Courbe en S de Galton", Annales des Mines - 1952 - n° III -IV. 
20. G.B. Wetherill - Sequential Estimation of Quantal Response CurvesJ. of the Royal Statistical Society, Vol. 25, 1963. Zbl0203.21505
21. E.J. Ariens et A.M. Simonis - Drug-Receptor Interaction. Acta Physiol. Pharmacol. Neerlandica11 - 1962. 
22. J.R. Ashford et C.S. Smith - General Models for Quantal Response to the Joint Action of a Mixture of Drugs. Biometrika, 51 - 1954. Zbl0129.34703MR175271
23. J.R. Ashford et C.S. Smith - An Alternative System for the Classification of Mathematical Models for Quantal Responses to Mixtures of Drugs in Biological Assay, Biometrics, 21 - 1965. 
24. P.S. Hewlett et R.L. Plackett - Models for Quantal Responses to Mixtures of two Drugs. Proc. Symp. quant. Methods in Pharmacol.Leyden, 1960, 1961, 328-336. 
25. R.L. Plackett et P.S. Hewlett - A Comparison of two Approaches to the Construction of Models for Quantal Responses to Mixtures of Drugs. Biometrics, 23, March 1967.