Une méthode de segmentation pour l'analyse de données issues de comparaisons par paires

Ph. Courcoux; M. Séménou

Revue de Statistique Appliquée (1997)

  • Volume: 45, Issue: 2, page 59-69
  • ISSN: 0035-175X

How to cite


Courcoux, Ph., and Séménou, M.. "Une méthode de segmentation pour l'analyse de données issues de comparaisons par paires." Revue de Statistique Appliquée 45.2 (1997): 59-69. <http://eudml.org/doc/106415>.

author = {Courcoux, Ph., Séménou, M.},
journal = {Revue de Statistique Appliquée},
language = {fre},
number = {2},
pages = {59-69},
publisher = {Société de Statistique de France},
title = {Une méthode de segmentation pour l'analyse de données issues de comparaisons par paires},
url = {http://eudml.org/doc/106415},
volume = {45},
year = {1997},

AU - Courcoux, Ph.
AU - Séménou, M.
TI - Une méthode de segmentation pour l'analyse de données issues de comparaisons par paires
JO - Revue de Statistique Appliquée
PY - 1997
PB - Société de Statistique de France
VL - 45
IS - 2
SP - 59
EP - 69
LA - fre
UR - http://eudml.org/doc/106415
ER -


  1. Bradley R.A., Terry M.E. (1952). Rank analysis of incomplete block designs : The method of paired comparisons. Biometrika, 39, 324-45. Zbl0047.12903MR70925
  2. Carroll J.D. (1980). Models and methods for multidimensional analysis of preferential choice (or other dominance data in : E.D. Langermann and H. Feger (eds), Similarity and choice. Bern: Huber. pp. 234- 289. 
  3. Coombs C.H., (1958). On the use of inconsistency of preferences in psychological measurement. Journal of experimental psychology55, 1-7. 
  4. Cornell J.A., (1981). Experiments with mixtures. John Wiley & Sons, New York. Zbl0597.62087MR608220
  5. David H.A., (1988). The method of paired comparisons. Oxford University Press, New York. Zbl0665.62075MR947340
  6. De Sarbo W.S., De Soete G., Eliasaberg J., (1987). A new stochastic multidimensional unfolding model for the investigation of paired comparison consumer preference/choice data. Journal of Economical Psychology8, 357-384. 
  7. De Soete G., Carroll J.D., (1983). A maximum likelihood method for fitting the wandering vector model. Psychometrika, 48, 4, 553-566. Zbl0524.62112
  8. De Soete G., Desarbo W.S., (1991). A latent class probit model for analyzing pick any/N data. Journal of Classification, 8, 45-63. Zbl0725.62058
  9. Dempster A.P., Laird N.M., Rubin D.B., (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B, 39, 1-38. Zbl0364.62022MR501537
  10. Dillon W.R., Kumar A., Smith De Borrero M., (1993). Capturing individual differences in paired comparaisons : an extended BTL model incorporating descriptor variables. Journal of Marketing Research, XXX, 42-51. 
  11. Dykstra O. JR., (1956). A note on rank analysis of incomplete block designs : A method of paired compaisons employing unequal repetitions on pairs. Biometrics12, 301-306. MR82943
  12. Mclachlan G.L., Basford K.E., (1988). Mixtures models : inference and application to clustering. Marcel Dekker, New York. Zbl0697.62050MR926484
  13. O'Mahony M., Masuoka S., Ishii R., (1994). A theoretical note on difference tests : models, paradoxes and cognitive strategies. Journal of Sensory Studies9, 247-272. 
  14. Schonemann P.H., Wang M.M., (1972). An individual difference model for the multidimensional analysis of preference data. Psychometrika37, 3, 275-309. MR314202
  15. Thurstone L.L., (1927). A law of comparative judgment. Psychological Review34, 273-286. 

NotesEmbed ?


You must be logged in to post comments.

To embed these notes on your page include the following JavaScript code on your page where you want the notes to appear.

Only the controls for the widget will be shown in your chosen language. Notes will be shown in their authored language.

Tells the widget how many notes to show per page. You can cycle through additional notes using the next and previous controls.


Note: Best practice suggests putting the JavaScript code just before the closing </body> tag.