La maîtrise des incertitudes dans un contexte industriel. 1re partie : une approche méthodologique globale basée sur des exemples

Étienne de Rocquigny

Journal de la société française de statistique (2006)

  • Volume: 147, Issue: 3, page 33-71
  • ISSN: 1962-5197

How to cite

top

de Rocquigny, Étienne. "La maîtrise des incertitudes dans un contexte industriel. 1re partie : une approche méthodologique globale basée sur des exemples." Journal de la société française de statistique 147.3 (2006): 33-71. <http://eudml.org/doc/198815>.

@article{deRocquigny2006,
author = {de Rocquigny, Étienne},
journal = {Journal de la société française de statistique},
language = {fre},
number = {3},
pages = {33-71},
publisher = {Société française de statistique},
title = {La maîtrise des incertitudes dans un contexte industriel. 1re partie : une approche méthodologique globale basée sur des exemples},
url = {http://eudml.org/doc/198815},
volume = {147},
year = {2006},
}

TY - JOUR
AU - de Rocquigny, Étienne
TI - La maîtrise des incertitudes dans un contexte industriel. 1re partie : une approche méthodologique globale basée sur des exemples
JO - Journal de la société française de statistique
PY - 2006
PB - Société française de statistique
VL - 147
IS - 3
SP - 33
EP - 71
LA - fre
UR - http://eudml.org/doc/198815
ER -

References

top
  1. [1] APOSTOLAKIS G. (1999), The distinction between aleatory and epistemic uncertainties is important ; an example from the inclusion of aging effects in the PSA, PSA'99, Washington DC. 
  2. [2] AVEN T. (2003), Foundations of Risk Analysis, Wiley. MR2015895
  3. [3] BECK M.B.(1987), Water Quality Modeling : A Review of the Analysis of Uncertainty, Wat. Res. Research, Vol. 23, n° 8. 
  4. [4] BEAUDOUIN F., MUNIER B., SERQUIN Y. (1997), Multiattribute utility theory : Towards a more general framework, Proc. of the 1997 ESReDA seminar on decision analysis and its applications in safety and reliability. Zbl1012.90016
  5. [5] BESTION D. (2003), Final Report -§ 4.2 State of the Art on Uncertainty Evaluation, European Project for Future Advances in Sciences and Technology for Nuclear Engineering Thermal-Hydraulics (EUROFASTNET). 
  6. [6] BOYACK B.E. (1990), Quantifying reactor safety margins-part I : an overview of the code scaling, applicability and uncertainty evaluation methodology, Nucl. Eng. Des. 119, 1-15. 
  7. [7] BUSSAC R., BAILLY P., THOMAS Ph., de ROCQUIGNY E. (2004), CO2 emissions : estimating uncertainties in practice for power plants, "Implementation of European Environmental Regulation in Fossil-Fired Power Plant" of EDF Group" Seminar Sep. 2004, Gdansk, Polska. 
  8. [8] CACUCI D.G., et al. (1980), Sensitivity Theory for General Systems of Nonli-near Equations, Nucl. Sc. & Eng. 75. 
  9. [9] CAMBIER S. (2000), Approche probabilité pour la prise en compte de la dispersion de paramètres mécaniques - Application à la fatigue vibratoire de réseaux de tuyauteries, Thèse ENSAM Paris. 
  10. [10] CAMBIER S., GUIHOT P., COFFIGNAL G. (2002), Computational methods for accounting of structural uncertainties, applications to dynamic behavior prediction of piping systems. Structural Safety, 24 : 29-50. 
  11. [11] CORRE B. (2003), Problématique des incertitudes en exploration-production pétrolière : application des plans d'expériences. Total Fina Elf, Séminaire «Plans d'Expériences Numériques», Ec. Mines St-Etienne. 
  12. [12] CUKIER R.I., LEVINE H.B., SCHULER K.E. (1978). Non-linear sensitivity analysis of multi-parameter model systems. Journal of computational physics 26, p. 1-42. Zbl0369.65023MR465355
  13. [13] DACUNHA-CASTELLE D. (1996). Chemins de l'aléatoire. Le hasard et le risque dans la société moderne. Flammarion, Paris. 
  14. [14] DEMPSTER A. P. (1967). Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping, Annals of Math. Statistics 38 : 325-339. Zbl0168.17501MR207001
  15. [15] DE ROCQUIGNY E. (2005), Couplage mécano-probabiliste pour la fiabilité des structures - un cas industriel où la robustesse d'une surface de réponse est démontrable. Actes du 17 ème Congrès Français de Mécanique. Troyes. 
  16. [16] DE ROCQUIGNY E. (2004), Tutoriel Incertitudes, présenté dans la Conférence Lambda-Mu 14, Bourges, Octobre 2004. 
  17. [17] DEVICTOR N. (2004), Intérêt des méthodes statistiques pour la prise en compte des incertitudes dans les processus de décision, Phoebus N°31. 
  18. [18] DEVICTOR N. (1996), Fiabilité et mécanique : méthodes FORM/SORM et couplages avec des codes d'éléments finis par surfaces de réponse adaptative. PhD Université Blaise Pascal, Clermont-Ferrand. 
  19. [19] DEVICTOR N., BOLADO LAVIN R. (eds) (2005), Proc. of the Workshop on the Use of Expert Judgment in Decision-Making, CEA & Eur. Comm. JRC Petten, Aix-en-Provence. 
  20. [20] Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community & Commission - Decision of 29 January 2004 (C(2004) 130) establishing guidelines for the monitoring and reporting of greenhouse gas émissions pursuant to Directive 2003/87/EC. 
  21. [21] DITLEVSEN O. & MADSEN H.O. (1996), Structural reliability Methods, John Wiley & Sons. 
  22. [22] DUBOIS D., PRADE H. (1988), Possibility theory : an approach to computerized processing of uncertainty, New York, Plenum Press. Zbl0703.68004MR1104217
  23. [23] DUCKSTEIN L., PARENT E. (1994), Engineering Risk in Natural Resources Management, NATO ASI Series. 
  24. [24] DUTFOY A. (2000), Uncertainty propagation in radionuclide transport modelling for performance assessment of a nuclear waste repository, Proc. of PSAM5, Japan. 
  25. [25] DUTFOY A., RITZ J.B. (2001), Uncertainty propagation in a 3D thermal code for performance assessment of a nuclear waste disposal, Proceedings of the SIAM'6 Conference on Mathematical and Computational Issues in the Geosciences, Boulder, Colorado. 
  26. [26] EFRON B., TIBSHIRANI R.J. (1993), An introduction to the Bootstrap, Chapman & Hall. Zbl0835.62038MR1270903
  27. [27] EKELAND I. (1991), Au Hasard - La chance, la science et le monde, Seuil. 
  28. [28] FREY H.C., RHODES D.S. (2005), Quantitative Analysis of Variability and Uncertainty in with Known Measurement Error : Methodology and Case Study, Risk Analysis Vol. 25, No3. 
  29. [29] GRANGER MORGAN M., HENRION M. (1990), Uncertainty - A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis, Cambridge University Press. MR1111274
  30. [30] HELTON J. (1993), Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques for use in performance assessment for radioactive waste disposal, Rel. Eng. & Syst. Saf., 42, 327-367. 
  31. [31] HELTON J.C., BURMASTER D.E. et al. (1996), Treatment of Aleatory and Epistemic Uncertainty, Special Issue of Rel. Eng. & Syst. Saf., vol. 54 n°2 et 3. 
  32. [32] HELTON J.C., OBERKAMPF W.L. (2004), Alternative Representations of Epistemic Uncertainty, Special Issue of Rel. Eng. & Syst. Saf., vol. 85 n°1-3. 
  33. [33] HOFFMAN F.O., HAMMONDS J.S. (1994), Propagation of Uncertainty in Risk Assessments : the Need to Distinguish between Uncertainty Due to Lack of Knowledge and Uncertainty due to Variability, Risk Analysis, Vol 14. n°5. 
  34. [34] INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC) 2000, Good practice guidance and Uncertainty Management in National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. 
  35. [35] KENDALL MG. & STUART ( 1943-1979), A, The Advanced Theory of Statistics (2 vol), Griffin & Co., London. Zbl0249.62003
  36. [36] KNIGHT F.H. (1921), Risk, Uncertainty and Profit, Hart, Schaffner & Marx. 
  37. [37] KUSCHEL N., RACKWITZ R. (2000), Optimal design under time-variant reliability constraints, Structural Safety, Volume 22, Issue 2, p. 113-127. Zbl0972.90019
  38. [38] LANNOY A., et al. (1994), Méthodes avancées d'analyse des bases de données du retour d'expérience industriel, Coll. D.E.R.EDF, n°86, Eyrolles. 
  39. [39] LEBRUN R. (2006), Modelling dependency with copulas in reliability analysis, a new approach to the FORM and SORM methods, submitted to 8 PSAM Conference. 
  40. [40] LEMMER J.F., KANAL L.N. (eds) (1986), Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Elsevier. 
  41. [41] LENCASTRE A. (1999), Hydraulique générale, Eyrolles. 
  42. [42] McKAY M.D. (1996), Application of Variance-Based Methods to NUREG-1150 Uncertainty Analyses, USNRC 1996. 
  43. [43] McKONE T.E. (1994), Uncertainty and Variability in Human Exposures to Soil Contaminants Through Home-Grown Food : A Monte-Carlo Assessment, Risk Analysis Vol 14, No4. 
  44. [44] MERRICK J.R., et al. (2005), Assessing uncertainty in Simulation-Based Maritime Assessment, Risk Analysis Vol. 25, No3. 
  45. [45] MIQUEL J. (1984), Guide pratique d'estimation des probabilités de crues, Eyrolles. 
  46. [46] NELSEN R.B. (1999), An introduction to copulas, SPRINGER. Zbl0909.62052MR1653203
  47. [47] NILSEN T.-, AVEN T. (2003), Models and model uncertainty in the context of risk analysis, Rel. Eng. Sys. Safe. 79, 309-317. 
  48. [48] Norme AFNOR XP X 07-020 (1996) : Normes Fondamentales : Guide pour l'expression de l'incertitude de mesure - AFNOR ( 1999) : Guide pour l'expression de l'incertitude de mesure, NF ENV 13005. 
  49. [49] OBERKAMPF W.L. et al. (2002), Error and uncertainty in modelling and simulation, Rel. Eng. &; Sys. Saf., 75. 
  50. [50] PATÉ-CORNELL M.E. (1996), Uncertainty in risk analysis : six levels of treatment, Rel. Eng. & Syst. Saf. 54 (2-3), 95-111. 
  51. [51] PENDOLA M. (2000), Fiabilité des Structures en contexte d'incertitudes statistiques et d'écarts de modélisation, Thèse de l'Université Clermont II. 
  52. [52] PERSOZ M., HUGONNARD-BRUYÈRE S., VENTURINI V., MEISTER E. (2000), Deterministic and probabilistic assessments of the reactor pressure vessel structural integrity with user-friendly software, ASME Press. Vess. &; Piping. 
  53. [53] PROCACCIA H., MORILHAT P. (1996), Fiabilité des structures des installations industrielles, Coll. D.E.R. EDF, n°94, Eyrolles. 
  54. [54] QUIGGIN J. (1982), A theory of anticipated utility, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, vol 3, pp. 323-343. 
  55. [55] RABL A., SPADARO J.V. (1999), Damages and Costs of Air Pollution : an Analysis of Uncertainties, Environment International Vol 25(1), 29-46. MR1750402
  56. [56] RASMUSSEN et al. (1975), Reactor Safety Study : An Assessment of Accident Risks in U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Plants, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, NUREG-75/014 (WASH-1400), Washington D.C. 
  57. [57] REISS R.D., THOMAS M. (2001), Statistical Analysis of Extreme Values, Ed. Birkhauser. Zbl1002.62002MR1819648
  58. [58] RELCON A.B., Risk Spectrum - Theory Manual. 
  59. [59] ROYSET J.O., DER KIUREGHIAN A., and POLAK E. (2001), Reliability-based optimal structural design by the decoupling approach, Rel. Eng. Sz Syst. Saf., Vol. 73, Issue 3, P. 213-221. 
  60. [60] ROWE W.D. (1994), Understanding Uncertainty, Risk Analysis, Vol 14. n°5. 
  61. [61] SAVAGE L.H. ( 1954 & 1972), The Foundations of Statistics, Dover, New York. Zbl0276.62006MR348870
  62. [62] SHANNON C.E., (1948), A mathematical theory of communication, Bell Systems Technical Journal 27. Zbl1154.94303MR26286
  63. [63] SOURGET F., et al. (2004), Protection de la ligne TGV-Méditerranée face aux vents traversiers, Actes de la Conf. Lambda-Mu 14, Bourges. 
  64. [64] SUDRET B., DEFAUX G., PENDOLA M. (2005), Time-variant finite element reliability analysis - Application to the durability of cooling towers, Structural Safety, Vol. 27, pp. 93-112. 
  65. [65] SUDRET B., GUÉDÉ Z., LEMAIRE M. (2005), Probabilistic assessment of thermal fatigue in nuclear components, Nucl. Eng. Des., Vol. 235, pp. 219-235. 
  66. [66] VON NEUMANN J., MORGENSTERN O., (1944), Theory of games and economic behavior, Princeton University Press. Zbl0063.05930MR11937
  67. [67] WALLEY P. (1991), Statistical Reasoning with Imprecise Probabilities, London, Chapman and Hall. Zbl0732.62004MR1145491

NotesEmbed ?

top

You must be logged in to post comments.

To embed these notes on your page include the following JavaScript code on your page where you want the notes to appear.

Only the controls for the widget will be shown in your chosen language. Notes will be shown in their authored language.

Tells the widget how many notes to show per page. You can cycle through additional notes using the next and previous controls.

    
                

Note: Best practice suggests putting the JavaScript code just before the closing </body> tag.