La maîtrise des incertitudes dans un contexte industriel. 2nde partie : revue des méthodes de modélisation statistique physique et numérique
Journal de la société française de statistique (2006)
- Volume: 147, Issue: 3, page 73-106
- ISSN: 1962-5197
Access Full Article
topHow to cite
topDe Rocquigny, Étienne. "La maîtrise des incertitudes dans un contexte industriel. 2nde partie : revue des méthodes de modélisation statistique physique et numérique." Journal de la société française de statistique 147.3 (2006): 73-106. <http://eudml.org/doc/199087>.
@article{DeRocquigny2006,
author = {De Rocquigny, Étienne},
journal = {Journal de la société française de statistique},
language = {fre},
number = {3},
pages = {73-106},
publisher = {Société française de statistique},
title = {La maîtrise des incertitudes dans un contexte industriel. 2nde partie : revue des méthodes de modélisation statistique physique et numérique},
url = {http://eudml.org/doc/199087},
volume = {147},
year = {2006},
}
TY - JOUR
AU - De Rocquigny, Étienne
TI - La maîtrise des incertitudes dans un contexte industriel. 2nde partie : revue des méthodes de modélisation statistique physique et numérique
JO - Journal de la société française de statistique
PY - 2006
PB - Société française de statistique
VL - 147
IS - 3
SP - 73
EP - 106
LA - fre
UR - http://eudml.org/doc/199087
ER -
References
top- [1] APOSTOLAKIS G. (1999), The distinction between aleatory and epistemic uncertainties is important ; an example from the inclusion of aging effects in the PSA, PSA'99, Washington DC.
- [2] ARDILLON E., & de ROCQUIGNY E. (2003), Probabilistic estimation of safety quantites for complex non-regular physical systems with uncertain parameters. Proc. 25th ESReDA Seminar, Paris.
- [3] BEAUDOUIN F., MUNIER B., SERQUIN Y. (1997), Multiattribute utility theory : Towards a more general framework, Proc. of the 1997 ESReDA seminar on decision analysis and its applications in safety and reliability. Zbl1012.90016
- [4] BESTION D. (2003), Final Report -§ 4.2 State of the Art on Uncertainty Evaluation, European Project for Future Advances in Sciences and Technology for Nuclear Engineering Thermal-Hydraulics (EUROFASTNET).
- [5] BOX G.E.P and DRAPER N.R (1987), Empirical Model Building and Response Surface, J. Wiley & Sons, Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical statistics. Zbl0614.62104MR861118
- [6] BOYACK B.E. (1990), Quantifying reactor safety margins-part I : an overview of the code scaling, applicability and uncertainty evaluation methodology, Nucl. Eng. Des. 119, 1-15.
- [7] CAMBIER S. (2000), Approche probabilité pour la prise en compte de la dispersion de paramètres mécaniques - Application à la fatigue vibratoire de réseaux de tuyauteries, Thèse ENSAM Paris.
- [8] CAMBIER S., DESCELIERS C., SOIZE S. (2003), Prise en compte probabiliste des incertitudes dans l'estimation du comportement sismique d'un circuit primaire. 7ème Colloque National AFPS.
- [9] CAMBIER S., GUIHOT P., COFFIGNAL G. (2002), Computational methods for accounting of structural uncertainties, applications to dynamic behavior prediction of piping systems. Structural Safety, 24 : 29-50.
- [10] CHIA C.-Y., AYYUB B.-M. (1994), Conditional sampling for simulation-based structural reliability assessment, Structural Safety et reliability, Schueller, Schonzuka & Yao (eds), Balkema, Rotterdam.
- [11] CHICK S.E. (2000), Bayesian Methods for Simulation, Proc. of the 2000 Winter Simulation Conference, Washington D.C.
- [12] CORRE B. (2003), Problématique des incertitudes en exploration-production pétrolière : application des plans d'expériences. Total Fina Elf, Séminaire « Plans d'Expériences Numériques » Ec. Mines St-Etienne.
- [13] CUKIER R.I., LEVINE H.B., SCHULER K.E. (1978). Non-linear sensitivity analysis of multi-parameter model systems. Journal of computational physics 26, 1-42. Zbl0369.65023MR465355
- [14] DE CRÉCY A. (1997), CIRCE : a tool for calculating the uncertainties of the constitutive relationships of Cathare2, 8th International Topical Meeting on Nuclear reactor Thermo-Hydraulics (NURETH8), Kyoto.
- [15] DEMPSTER A. P. (1967). Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping, Annals of Math. Statistics 38, 325-339. Zbl0168.17501MR207001
- [16] DEMPSTER F., LAIRD N.M., RUBIN D.B. (1977), Maximum likelihood from incomplete data from the EM algorithm, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (Ser. B) 39, 1-38. Zbl0364.62022MR501537
- [17] DE ROCQUIGNY E. (2005), A simple Bayesian proposal to aggregate expert judgement and observations on epistemic and aleatory uncertainties - extensions and associated industrial needs, Proc. of the Workshop on the Use of Expert Judgment in Decision-Making, CEA & Eur. Comm. JRC Petten, Aix-en-Provence.
- [18] DE ROCQUIGNY E. (2005), A statistical approach to control conservatism of robust uncertainty propagation methods ; application to accidental thermal hydraulics calculations, Proceedings of ESREL-05, Tri City, Poland.
- [19] DE ROCQUIGNY E. (2005), Couplage mécano-probabiliste pour la fiabilité des structures - un cas industriel où la robustesse d'une surface de réponse est démontrable. Actes du 17ème Congrès Français de Mécanique. Troyes.
- [20] DE ROCQUIGNY E. (2004), Tutoriel Incertitudes, présenté dans la Conférence Lambda-Mu 14, Bourges, Octobre 2004.
- [21] DE ROCQUIGNY E. (2006), Problèmes ouverts - Sujet n° 1 « Statistiques, mesures et calcul scientifique inverse», www.jds2006.fr/prob-ouverts.php 38èmes Journ. Franc, de Stat., Clamart, 2006.
- [22] DESCELIERS C., SOIZE C., CAMBIER S. (2003), Nonparametric-parametric model for random uncertainties in nonlinear structural dynamics -Application to earthquake engineering, to earthquake engineering and Structural Dynamics, 33, 315-327.
- [23] DEVICTOR N. (1996) Fiabilité et mécanique : méthodes FORM/SORM et couplages avec des codes d'éléments finis par surfaces de réponse adaptative. PhD Université Blaise Pascal, Clermont-Ferrand.
- [24] DEVICTOR N., BOLADO LAVIN R. (eds) (2005), Proc. of the Workshop on the Use of Expert Judgment in Decision-Making, CEA & Eur. Comm. JRC Petten, Aix-en-Provence.
- [25] DITLEVSEN O. & MADSEN H.O. (1996), Structural reliability Methods, John Wiley & Sons.
- [26] DUBOIS D., PRADE H. (1988), Possibility theory : an approach to computerized processing of uncertainty, New York, Plenum Press. Zbl0703.68004MR1104217
- [27] DUCKSTEIN L., PARENT E. (1994), Engineering Risk in Natural Resources Management, NATO ASI Series.
- [28] DUPUY J.P. (2002), Pour un catastrophisme éclairé - Quand l'Impossible est certain, Ed. du Seuil.
- [29] DUTFOY A. (2001), Mefisto, The EDF Reliability Method to Propagate Uncertainties, Proc. of ICOSSAR 2001.
- [30] DUTFOY A. (2000), Uncertainty propagation in radionuclide transport mo-delling for performance assessment of a nuclear waste repository, Proc. of PSAM5, Japan.
- [31] EFRON B., TIBSHIRANI R.J. (1993), An introduction to the Bootstrap, Chapman & Hall. Zbl0835.62038MR1270903
- [32] FAURE C. (1996), Splitting of algebraic expressions for automatic differentiation, Proc. of the 2nd International Workshop on Computational Differentiation, 12-15 fév. 1996, Santa Fe. Zbl0871.65013
- [33] FREY H.C., RHODES D.S. (2005), Quantitative Analysis of Variability and Uncertainty in with Known Measurement Error : Methodology and Case Study, Risk Analysis Vol. 25, No3.
- [34] GILLE-GENEST A. (1999), Utilisation des méthodes numériques probabilistes dans les applications au domaine de la Fiabilité des Structures, Thèse de l'Université Paris VI - EDF R&D.
- [35] GRANGER MORGAN M., HENRION M. (1990), Uncertainty - A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis, Cambridge University Press.
- [36] GRIEWANK A. (2000), Evaluating derivatives - Principles and Techniques of Algorithmic Differentiation, SIAM, Philadelphia. Zbl0958.65028MR1753583
- [37] HASCOUET L., PASCUAL V. (2004), TAPENADE 2.1 user's guide, INRIA report, www.inria.fr/rrrt/rt-0300.html
- [38] HELTON J.C., BURMASTER D.E. et al. (1996), Treatment of Aleatory and Epistemic Uncertainty, Special Issue of Rel. Eng. & Syst. Saf., vol. 54 n°2 et 3.
- [39] HELTON J.C., DAVIS F.J. (2003), Latin hypercube sampling and the propagation of uncertainty in analyses of complex systems, Rel. Eng. & Syst. Saf. 81, 23-69.
- [40] HELTON J.C., OBERKAMPF W.L. (2004), Alternative Representations of Epistemic Uncertainty, Special Issue of Rel. Eng. & Syst. Saf., vol. 85 n°l-3.
- [41] HENRY Cl. (2004), Etat de la connaissance scientifique et mobilisation du principe de précaution, 3e Colloque international du réseau Monder, Paris, 12-15 sept.2004.
- [42] IOOSS B., VAN DORPE F., and DEVICTOR N. (2006) Response Surfaces and Sensitivity Analysis for an Environmental Model of Dose Calculations. Rel. Eng. Sz Syst. Saf., à paraître.
- [43] JACQUES J., LAVERGNE C., DEVICTOR N. (2006), Sensitivity Analysis in presence of model uncertainty and correlated outputs, Rel. Eng. and Syst. Saf., Elsevier, à paraître.
- [44] JOURDAN A. (2002), Approches Statistiques des Expériences Simulées, Rev. Statistique Appliquée, L(1), 49-64.
- [45] KENDALL MG. & STUART ( 1943-1979), A, The Advanced Theory of Statistics (2 vol), Griffin & Co., London. Zbl0249.62003
- [46] KLEIJNEN J.P.C. and SARGENT R.G. (2000), A methodology for fitting and validating metamodels in simulation, European Journal of Operational Research, 120, 14-29. Zbl0985.65007
- [47] KNIGHT F.H. (1921), Risk, Uncertainty and Profit, Hart, Schaffner & Marx.
- [48] KUROWICKA D., and COOKE R.M. (2002), Techniques for generic probabilistic inversion, Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management, E.J. Bonano et al. (eds), Elsevier, 1543-1550.
- [49] KUSCHEL N., RACKWITZ R. (2000), Optimal design under time-variant reliability constraints, Structural Safety, Volume 22, Issue 2, 113-127. Zbl0972.90019
- [50] LANNOY A., et al. (1994), Méthodes avancées d'analyse des bases de données du retour d'expérience industriel, Coll. D.E.R.EDF, n°86, Eyrolles.
- [51] LEBRUN R. (2006), Modelling dependency with copulas in reliability analysis, a new approach to the FORM and SORM methods, submitted to 8th PSAM Conference.
- [52] LECOUTRE J.P., TASSI P. (1987), Statistique non paramétrique et robustesse, Economica.
- [53] LEMAIRE M. (2005), Fiabilité des Structures, Coll. Génie Civil, Hermès-Lavoisier.
- [54] MAHÉ P., de ROCQUIGNY E. (2005), Incertitudes non observables en calcul scientifique industriel - Etude d'algorithmes simples pour intégrer dispersion intrinsèque et ébauche d'expert, 37èmes Journ. Franc. de Stat., Pau, 2005.
- [55] MCKAY M.D. (1996), Application of Variance-Based Methods to NUREG-1150 Uncertainty Analyses, USNRC 1996.
- [56] MIQUEL J. (1984), Guide pratique d'estimation des probabilités de crues, Eyrolles.
- [57] MYERS R.H. (1971), Response surface methodology, Allyn and Bacon, Inc., Boston.
- [58] NELSEN R.B. (1999), An introduction to copulas, SPRINGER. Zbl0909.62052MR1653203
- [59] OLIVI L., (1984), Response surface methodology, Handbook for Nuclear Safety Analysis, J.R.C., European Commission.
- [60] PENDOLA M. (2000), Fiabilité des Structures en contexte d'incertitudes statistiques et d'écarts de modélisation, Thèse de l'Université Clermont II.
- [61] PERSOZ M., HUGONNARD-BRUYÈRE S., VENTURINI V., MEISTER E. (2000), Deterministic and probabilistic assessments of the reactor pressure vessel structural integrity with user-friendly software, ASME Press. Vess. &; Piping.
- [62] PROCACCIA H., MORILHAT P. (1996), Fiabilité des structures des installations industrielles, Coll. D.E.R. EDF, n°94, Eyrolles.
- [63] QUIGGIN J. (1982), A theory of anticipated utility, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Vol. 3, pp. 323-343.
- [64] REISS R.D., THOMAS M. (2001), Statistical Analysis of Extreme Values, Ed. Birkhauser. Zbl1002.62002MR1819648
- [65] ROYSET J.O., DER KIUREGHlAN A., and POLAK E. (2001), Reliability-based optimal structural design by the decoupling approach, Rel. Eng. & Syst. Saf., Vol. 73, Issue 3, pp. 213-221.
- [66] ROWE W.D. (1994), Understanding Uncertainty, Risk Analysis, Vol. 14. n°5, pp. 743-750.
- [67] RUBINSTEIN R.Y. (1981), Simulation and the Monte-Carlo Method, Wiley. Zbl0529.68076MR624270
- [68] SALTELLI A., BOLADO R. (1998), An alternative way to compute the Fourier Amplitude Sensitivity Test, Computational Statistics and data analysis, 26, 445-460. Zbl1042.65506
- [69] SALTELLI A., TARANTOLA S., CAMPALONGO F., RATTO M. (2004), Sensitivity analysis in practice : a guide to assessing scientific models, Wiley. Zbl1049.62112MR2048817
- [70] SAPORTA G. (1990), Probabilités, Analyse de Données et Statistique, Ed. Technip. Zbl0703.62003
- [71] SHANNON C. E., (1948), A mathematical theory of communication, Bell Systems Technical Journal, Vol. 27, pp. 379-423, 623-656. Zbl1154.94303MR26286
- [72] SOBOL I.M. (1993), Sensitivity estimates for non-linear mathematical models, Mathematical Modelling and Computational Experiments. Zbl1039.65505
- [73] SOIZE C. (2000), A non-parametric model of random uncertainties for reduced matrix models in structural dynamics, Probab. Engrg. Mech. 15 (3) 277-294.
- [74] SUDRET B., GUÉDÉ Z., LEMAIRE M. (2005), Probabilistic assessment of thermal fatigue in nuclear components, Nucl. Eng. Des., 235, 219-235.
- [75] SUDRET B., DER KIUREGHIAN A. (2000), Stochastic Finite Elements and Reliability - A state-of-the-art report, Report n° UCB/SEMM-2000/08.
- [76] SUDRET B. (2005), Des éléments finis stochastiques spectraux aux surfaces de réponses stochastiques : une approche unifiée, 17ème Congrès Français de Mécanique, Troyes, August 2005.
- [77] TALAGRAND O., COURTIER P. (1987), Variational assimilation of meteorological observations with the adjoint vorticity equation, I : theory. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 113.
- [78] TARANTOLA (1987), Inverse Problem Theory and methods for data fitting and model parameter estimation, Elsevier - Amsterdam et Tarantola ( 2004), Inverse Problem Theory and methods for model parameter estimation, SIAM. MR930881
- [79] VON NEUMANN J., MORGENSTERN O., (1944), Theory of games and economic behavior, Princeton University Press. Zbl0063.05930MR11937
- [80] WALTER E., PRONZATO L. (1994), Identification de Modèles Paramétriques à partir de données expérimentales, Coll. MASC, Masson. MR1306056
- [81] WILKS S. S. (1941), Determination of sample sizes for setting tolerance limits, Ann. Math. Statist. 12, pp. 91-96. Zbl0024.42703MR4451
NotesEmbed ?
topTo embed these notes on your page include the following JavaScript code on your page where you want the notes to appear.