The modern hypothesis testing hybrid : R. A. Fisher's fading influence

 Access to full text

 Full (PDF)

1. AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION. (2002). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author. 
2. BAKAN D. (1966). The test of significance in psychological research. Psychological Bulletin, 66, 423-437. 
3. BORING E. G. (1919). Mathematical vs. scientific significance. Psychological Bulletin, 16, 335-338. 
4. BREWER J. K. (1985). Behavioral statistics textbooks: Source of myths and misconceptions ? Journal of Educational Statistics, 10, 252-268. 
5. CARVER R. (1993). The case against statistical significance testing, revisited. Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 287-292. 
6. COHEN J. (1962). The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65, 145-153. 
7. COHEN J. (1990). Things I have learned (so far). American Psychologist, 45, 1304-1312. 
8. COHEN J. (1994). The earth is round (p < .05). American Psychologist, 49, 997-1003. 
9. COWLES M. (1989). Statistics in psychology: an historical perspective. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers. Zbl0717.62104
10. FISHER R. A. ( 1990/1925). Statistical methods for research workers. London: Oliver and Boyd (14th edition 1973 reprinted, Oxford University Press, 1990). Zbl51.0414.08MR346954JFM64.0544.03
11. FISHER R. A. ( 1935a). The design of experiments. New York: Hafner Publishing Company. JFM61.0566.03
12. FISHER R. A. ( 1935b). The logic of inductive inference. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 98, 39-82. Zbl0011.03205JFM61.1308.06
13. FISHER R. A. (1955). Statistical methods and scientific induction. Journal of the Royal Society, 17, 69-78. Zbl0066.38008MR76233
14. FISHER R. A. (1956). Statistical methods and scientific inference. Edingburgh: Oliver &; Boyd. Zbl0070.36903
15. FISHER R. A. (1959). Statistical methods and scientific research (2nd ed.). New York: Hafner. 
16. FISHER R. A. (1966). The design of experiments (8th ed.). New York: Hafner Publishing Company. JFM61.0566.03
17. FISHER BOX J. (1978). R. A. Fisher: the life of a scientist. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Zbl0666.01016MR500579
18. GIGERENZER G. (1993). The superego, the ego, and the id in statistical reasoning. In G. Keren & C. Lewis (eds.), A handbook for data analysis in the behavioral sciences: methodological issues (pp. 311-39). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 
19. GIGERENZER G., SWIJTINK Z., PORTER T., DASTON L., BEATTY J., KRÜGER L. (1989). The empire of chance: how probability changea science and everyday life. New York: Cambridge University Press. MR1042295
20. GILL J. (1999). The insignificance of null hypothesis significance testing. Political Research Quarterly, 52, 647-674. 
21. GILL J. (2002). Bayesian methods: a social and behavioral sciences approach. London: Chapman Hall/CRC. Zbl1033.62024
22. GOSSET W. S. (1937). " Student". Comparison between random and balanced arrangements of field plots. Biometrika, 29, 363-79. Zbl0018.03504
23. HACKING I. (1965). Logic of statistical inference. London: Cambridge University Press. Zbl0133.41604MR203837
24. HOWELL D. C. (1989). Fundamental statistics for the behavioral sciences (2nd edition). Boston: PWS-Kent Publishing Company. 
25. HUBERTY C. (1993). Historical origins of statistical testing practices: the treatment of Fisher versus Neyman-Pearson views in textbooks. Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 317-333. 
26. KENDALL M. G. (1943). The advanced theory of statistics (Vol. 1). New York: Lippincott. Zbl0063.03214MR10934
27. LECOUTRE B. (1998). From significance test to fiducial Bayesian inference. In Rouanet, H., Bernard, J. M., Bert, M. O , Lecoutre, B., Lecoutre, M. P., Le Roux, B. (1998). New ways in statistical methodology: From significance tests to Bayesian inference. Berne: Peter Lang. Zbl0930.62104MR1696566
28. LECOUTRE M.P. (1998). And... what about the researcher's point of view ? In Rouanet, H., Bernard, J. M., Bert, M. C , Lecoutre, B., Lecoutre, M. P., Le Roux, B. (1998). New ways in statistical methodology: From significance tests to Bayesian inference. Berne: Peter Lang. MR1696566
29. LECOUTRE B., LECOUTRE M.P., POITEVINEAU J. (2001). Uses, abuses and misuses of significance tests in the scientific community: Won't the Bayesian choice be unavoidable ? intemational Statistical Review, 69, 399-417. Zbl1213.62076
30. MEEHL P. (1978). Theoretical risks and tabular asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slow progress of soft psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 806-834. 
31. MELTON A. W. (1962). Editorial. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 553-7. 
32. NEHER A. (1967). Probability pyramiding, research error and the need for independent replication. The Psychological Record, 17, 257-262. 
33. NEYMAN J., PEARSON E. S. (1928). On the use and interpretation of certain test criteria for purposes of statistical inference (part 1). Biometrika, 20A, 175-240. Zbl54.0565.05JFM54.0565.05
34. NEYMAN J., IWASZKIEWICZ K., KOLODZIEJCZYK St. (1935). Statistical problems in agricultural experimentation. Supplement to the Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 2, 107-180. Zbl63.1103.02JFM63.1103.02
35. POITEVINEAU J. (1998). Méthodologie d'analyse des données expérimentales... Études de la pratique des tests statistiques chez les chercheurs en psychologie. approches normative, prescriptive et descriptive. Thèse Univ. De Rouen. Sous la dir de B. Lecoutre. 
36. POITEVINEAU J., LECOUTRE B. (2001). Interpretation of significance levels by psychological researchers: The .05 cliff effect may be overstated. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 847-850. 
37. ROUANET H., BERNARD J. M., BERT M. C. , LECOUTRE B., LECOUTRE M. P., LE ROUX B. (1998). New ways in statistical methodology: From significance tests to Bayesian inference. Berne: Peter Lang. Zbl0930.62104MR1696566
38. ROSENTHAL R. (1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 638-641. 
39. ROSENTHAL R., GAITO J. (1963). The interpretation of levels of significance by psychological researchers. Journal of Psychology, 55, 33-38. 
40. ROSSI J. S. (1990). Statistical power of psychological research: What have we gained in 20 years ? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 58, 646-656. 
41. SMART R. G. (1964). The importance of negative results in psychological research. The Canadian Psychologist, 5, 225-232. 
42. SNOW T. S., COMPTON W. C. (1996). Marital satisfaction and communication in fundamentalist protestant marriages. Psychological Reports, 78, 979-985. 
43. TVERSKY A., KAHNEMAN D. (1971). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131. 
44. VENN J. (1876). The logic of chance. London: Macmillan and Co. Zbl08.0111.03

1. Jeff Gill, Comments on D. Denis «Grappling with Fisher's legacy in social science hypothesis testing : some comments on Denis»
2. Ernest Kwan, Michael Friendly, Discussion and comments : strong versus weak significance tests and the role of meta-analytic procedures