On regularization methods for the numerical solution of parabolic control problems with pointwise state constraints

Ira Neitzel; Fredi Tröltzsch

ESAIM: Control, Optimisation and Calculus of Variations (2009)

  • Volume: 15, Issue: 2, page 426-453
  • ISSN: 1292-8119

Abstract

top
In this paper we study Lavrentiev-type regularization concepts for linear-quadratic parabolic control problems with pointwise state constraints. In the first part, we apply classical Lavrentiev regularization to a problem with distributed control, whereas in the second part, a Lavrentiev-type regularization method based on the adjoint operator is applied to boundary control problems with state constraints in the whole domain. The analysis for both classes of control problems is investigated and numerical tests are conducted. Moreover the method is compared with other numerical techniques.

How to cite

top

Neitzel, Ira, and Tröltzsch, Fredi. "On regularization methods for the numerical solution of parabolic control problems with pointwise state constraints." ESAIM: Control, Optimisation and Calculus of Variations 15.2 (2009): 426-453. <http://eudml.org/doc/245961>.

@article{Neitzel2009,
abstract = {In this paper we study Lavrentiev-type regularization concepts for linear-quadratic parabolic control problems with pointwise state constraints. In the first part, we apply classical Lavrentiev regularization to a problem with distributed control, whereas in the second part, a Lavrentiev-type regularization method based on the adjoint operator is applied to boundary control problems with state constraints in the whole domain. The analysis for both classes of control problems is investigated and numerical tests are conducted. Moreover the method is compared with other numerical techniques.},
author = {Neitzel, Ira, Tröltzsch, Fredi},
journal = {ESAIM: Control, Optimisation and Calculus of Variations},
keywords = {optimal control; parabolic equation; pointwise state constraints; boundary control; Lavrentiev-type regularization; parabolic differential equations},
language = {eng},
number = {2},
pages = {426-453},
publisher = {EDP-Sciences},
title = {On regularization methods for the numerical solution of parabolic control problems with pointwise state constraints},
url = {http://eudml.org/doc/245961},
volume = {15},
year = {2009},
}

TY - JOUR
AU - Neitzel, Ira
AU - Tröltzsch, Fredi
TI - On regularization methods for the numerical solution of parabolic control problems with pointwise state constraints
JO - ESAIM: Control, Optimisation and Calculus of Variations
PY - 2009
PB - EDP-Sciences
VL - 15
IS - 2
SP - 426
EP - 453
AB - In this paper we study Lavrentiev-type regularization concepts for linear-quadratic parabolic control problems with pointwise state constraints. In the first part, we apply classical Lavrentiev regularization to a problem with distributed control, whereas in the second part, a Lavrentiev-type regularization method based on the adjoint operator is applied to boundary control problems with state constraints in the whole domain. The analysis for both classes of control problems is investigated and numerical tests are conducted. Moreover the method is compared with other numerical techniques.
LA - eng
KW - optimal control; parabolic equation; pointwise state constraints; boundary control; Lavrentiev-type regularization; parabolic differential equations
UR - http://eudml.org/doc/245961
ER -

References

top
  1. [1] N. Arada and J.P. Raymond, Optimal control problems with mixed control-state constraints. SIAM J. Control 39 (2000) 1391–1407. Zbl0993.49022MR1825584
  2. [2] N. Arada, H. El Fekih and J.-P. Raymond, Asymptotic analysis of some control problems. Asymptotic Anal. 24 (2000) 343–366. Zbl0979.49020MR1797776
  3. [3] M. Bergounioux and K. Kunisch, Primal-dual active set strategy for state-constrained optimal control problems. Comput. Optim. Appl. 22 (2002) 193–224. Zbl1015.49026MR1911062
  4. [4] M. Bergounioux, K. Ito and K. Kunisch, Primal-dual strategy for constrained optimal control problems. SIAM J. Control Opt. 37 (1999) 1176–1194. Zbl0937.49017MR1691937
  5. [5] M. Bergounioux, M. Haddou, M. Hintermüller and K. Kunisch, A comparison of a Moreau-Yosida-based active set strategy and interior point methods for constrained optimal control problems. SIAM J. Optim. 11 (2000) 495–521. Zbl1001.49034MR1787272
  6. [6] J.T. Betts and S.L. Campbell, Discretize Then Optimize. Technical Report M&CT-TECH-03-01, Phantom Works, Mathematics & Computing Technology. A Division of The Boeing Company (2003). Zbl1197.49032
  7. [7] J.T. Betts and S.L. Campbell, Discretize then Optimize, in Mathematics in Industry: Challenges and Frontiers A Process View: Practice and Theory, D.R. Ferguson and T.J. Peters Eds., SIAM Publications, Philadelphia (2005). Zbl1197.49032MR2333222
  8. [8] J.T. Betts, S.L. Campbell and A. Englesone, Direct transcription solution of optimal control problems with higher order state constraints: theory vs. practice. Optim. Engineering 8 (2007) 1–19. Zbl1170.49311MR2330464
  9. [9] E. Casas, Boundary control of semilinear elliptic equations with pointwise state constraints. SIAM J. Control Opt. 31 (1993) 993–1006. Zbl0798.49020MR1227543
  10. [10] E. Casas, Pontryagin’s principle for state-constrained boundary control problems of semilinear parabolic equations. SIAM J. Control Opt. 35 (1997) 1297–1327. Zbl0893.49017MR1453300
  11. [11] K. Deckelnick and M. Hinze, Convergence of a finite element approximation to a state constrained elliptic control problem. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 45 (2007) 1937–1953. Zbl1154.65055MR2346365
  12. [12] M. Hintermüller, K. Ito and K. Kunisch, The primal-dual active set strategy as a semismooth Newton method. SIAM J. Optim. 13 (2003) 865–888. Zbl1080.90074MR1972219
  13. [13] M. Hintermüller, F. Tröltzsch and I. Yousept, Mesh-independence of semismooth Newton methods for Lavrentiev-regularized state constrained nonlinear optimal control problems. Numer. Math. 108 (2008) 571–603. Zbl1143.65051MR2369205
  14. [14] K. Ito and K. Kunisch, Augmented Lagrangian methods for nonsmooth, convex optimization in Hilbert spaces. Nonlinear Anal. Theory Methods Appl. 41 (2000) 591–616. Zbl0971.49014MR1780634
  15. [15] K. Ito and K. Kunisch, Semi-smooth Newton methods for state-constrained optimal control problems. Systems Control Lett. 50 (2003) 221–228. Zbl1157.49311MR2010814
  16. [16] S. Kameswaran and L.T. Biegler, Advantages of Nonlinear Programming Based Methodologies for Inequality Path Constrained Optimal Control Problems – An Analysis of the Betts and Campbell Heat Conduction Problem. Technical report, Chemical Engineering Department Carnegie Mellon, University Pittsburgh, USA (2005). 
  17. [17] K. Kunisch and A. Rösch, Primal-dual active set strategy for a general class of constrained optimal control problems. SIAM J. Optim. 13 (2002) 321–334. Zbl1028.49027MR1951024
  18. [18] J.L. Lions, Optimal Control of Systems Governed by Partial Differential Equations. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1971). Zbl0203.09001MR271512
  19. [19] C. Meyer and F. Tröltzsch, On an elliptic optimal control problem with pointwise mixed control-state constraints, in Recent Advances in Optimization, Proceedings of the 12th French-German-Spanish Conference on Optimization, Avignon, September 20–24, 2004, A. Seeger Ed., Lectures Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Springer-Verlag (2005). Zbl1194.49027MR2191158
  20. [20] C. Meyer, A. Rösch and F. Tröltzsch, Optimal control of PDEs with regularized pointwise state constraints. Comput. Optim. Appl. 33 (2006) 209–228. Zbl1103.90072MR2208817
  21. [21] C. Meyer, U. Prüfert and F. Tröltzsch, On two numerical methods for state-constrained elliptic control problems. Optim. Methods Software 22 (2007) 871–899. Zbl1172.49022MR2360802
  22. [22] I. Neitzel and F. Tröltzsch, On convergence of regularization methods for nonlinear parabolic optimal control problems with control and state constraints. Technical Report 24-03, SPP 1253 (2008). Zbl1188.49029MR2536485
  23. [23] U. Prüfert, F. Tröltzsch and M. Weiser, The convergence of an interior point method for an elliptic control problem with mixed control-state constraints. Comput. Optim. Appl. 39 (2008) 183–218. Zbl1144.90511MR2373245
  24. [24] J.-P. Raymond and F. Tröltzsch, Second order sufficient optimality conditions for nonlinear parabolic control problems with state constraints. Discrete Contin. Dyn. S. 6 (2000) 431–450. Zbl1010.49015MR1739375
  25. [25] J.-P. Raymond and H. Zidani, Hamiltonian Pontryagin’s principles for control problems governed by semilinear parabolic equations. Appl. Math. Optim. 39 (1999 ) 143–177. Zbl0922.49013MR1665668
  26. [26] A. Rösch and F. Tröltzsch, Existence of regular Lagrange multipliers for a nonlinear elliptic optimal control problem with pointwise control-state constraints. SIAM J. Control Opt. 45 (2006) 548–564. Zbl1108.49019MR2246090
  27. [27] A. Rösch and F. Tröltzsch, Sufficient second-order optimality conditions for an elliptic optimal control problem with pointwise control-state constraints. SIAM J. Optim. 17 (2006) 776–794. Zbl1119.49022MR2257208
  28. [28] A. Rösch and F. Tröltzsch, On regularity of solutions and Lagrange multipliers of optimal control problems for semilinear equations with mixed pointwise control-state constraints. SIAM J. Control Opt. 46 (2007) 1098–1115. Zbl05288517MR2338440
  29. [29] A. Schiela, The control reduced interior point method. A function space oriented algorithmic approach. Ph.D. thesis, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany (2006). 
  30. [30] F. Tröltzsch and I. Yousept, A regularization method for the numerical solution of elliptic boundary control problems with pointwise state constraints. Comput. Optim. Appl. DOI: 10.1007/s10589-007-9114-0 (2008) online first. Zbl1153.65343MR2471186

NotesEmbed ?

top

You must be logged in to post comments.

To embed these notes on your page include the following JavaScript code on your page where you want the notes to appear.

Only the controls for the widget will be shown in your chosen language. Notes will be shown in their authored language.

Tells the widget how many notes to show per page. You can cycle through additional notes using the next and previous controls.

    
                

Note: Best practice suggests putting the JavaScript code just before the closing </body> tag.