Combining evolutionary algorithms and exact approaches for multi-objective knowledge discovery

Mohammed Khabzaoui; Clarisse Dhaenens; El-Ghazali Talbi

RAIRO - Operations Research (2008)

  • Volume: 42, Issue: 1, page 69-83
  • ISSN: 0399-0559

Abstract

top
An important task of knowledge discovery deals with discovering association rules. This very general model has been widely studied and efficient algorithms have been proposed. But most of the time, only frequent rules are seeked. Here we propose to consider this problem as a multi-objective combinatorial optimization problem in order to be able to also find non frequent but interesting rules. As the search space may be very large, a discussion about different approaches is proposed and a hybrid approach that combines a metaheuristic and an exact operator is presented.

How to cite

top

Khabzaoui, Mohammed, Dhaenens, Clarisse, and Talbi, El-Ghazali. "Combining evolutionary algorithms and exact approaches for multi-objective knowledge discovery." RAIRO - Operations Research 42.1 (2008): 69-83. <http://eudml.org/doc/250395>.

@article{Khabzaoui2008,
abstract = { An important task of knowledge discovery deals with discovering association rules. This very general model has been widely studied and efficient algorithms have been proposed. But most of the time, only frequent rules are seeked. Here we propose to consider this problem as a multi-objective combinatorial optimization problem in order to be able to also find non frequent but interesting rules. As the search space may be very large, a discussion about different approaches is proposed and a hybrid approach that combines a metaheuristic and an exact operator is presented. },
author = {Khabzaoui, Mohammed, Dhaenens, Clarisse, Talbi, El-Ghazali},
journal = {RAIRO - Operations Research},
keywords = {Hybridization; multi-objective optimization; knowledge discovery; association rules; hybridization},
language = {eng},
month = {2},
number = {1},
pages = {69-83},
publisher = {EDP Sciences},
title = {Combining evolutionary algorithms and exact approaches for multi-objective knowledge discovery},
url = {http://eudml.org/doc/250395},
volume = {42},
year = {2008},
}

TY - JOUR
AU - Khabzaoui, Mohammed
AU - Dhaenens, Clarisse
AU - Talbi, El-Ghazali
TI - Combining evolutionary algorithms and exact approaches for multi-objective knowledge discovery
JO - RAIRO - Operations Research
DA - 2008/2//
PB - EDP Sciences
VL - 42
IS - 1
SP - 69
EP - 83
AB - An important task of knowledge discovery deals with discovering association rules. This very general model has been widely studied and efficient algorithms have been proposed. But most of the time, only frequent rules are seeked. Here we propose to consider this problem as a multi-objective combinatorial optimization problem in order to be able to also find non frequent but interesting rules. As the search space may be very large, a discussion about different approaches is proposed and a hybrid approach that combines a metaheuristic and an exact operator is presented.
LA - eng
KW - Hybridization; multi-objective optimization; knowledge discovery; association rules; hybridization
UR - http://eudml.org/doc/250395
ER -

References

top
  1. R. Agrawal and R. Srikant, Fast algorithms for mining association rules, in Proc. 20th Int. Conf. Very Large Data Bases, VLDB, edited by J.B. Bocca, M. Jarke, and C. Zaniolo, Morgan Kaufmann 12 (1994) 487–499  
  2. D.L.A. Araujo, H.S. Lopes and A.A. Freitas, A Parallel Genetic Algorithm for Rule Discovery in Large Databases, in Proc. 1999 IEEE Systems, Man and Cybernetics Conf., Vol. III (1999) 940–945, Tokyo, Japan.  
  3. M. Basseur, F. Seynhaeve and E-G. Talbi, Adaptive mechanisms for multi-objective evolutionary algorithms. IMACS multiconference, Computational Engineering in Systems Applications (CESA'03), IEEE Service Center, Piscataway, New Jersey, S3-R-00-222:100–107 (2003).  
  4. C. Borgelt, Efficient implementations of apriori and eclat, in Workshop Frequent Item Set Mining Implementations (FIMI 2003, Melbourne, FL, USA)90 (2003).  
  5. C.A. Coello, D.A. Van Veldhuizen and G.B. Lamont, Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-Objective Problems. Kluwer Academic Publishers (2002).  
  6. C. Cotta and J.M. Troya, Embedding branch and bound within evolutionary algorithms. Appl. Intell.18 (2003) 137–153 
  7. C.M. Fonseca and P.J. Fleming, An overview of evolutionary algorithms in multiobjective optimization. Evolutionary Comput.3 (1995) 1–16.  
  8. A. Freitas, On rule interestingness measures. Knowledge-Based Syst. J.12 (1999) 309–315.  
  9. R. Hilderman and H. Hamilton, Knowledge discovery and interestingness measures: A survey, technical report cs 99-04. Technical report, Department of Computer Science, University of Regina, October (1999).  
  10. T.P. Hong, H. Wang and W. Chen, Simultaneously applying multiple mutation operators in genetic algorithms. J. Heuristics6 (2000) 439–455.  
  11. A. Jaszkiewicz, On the performance of multiple objective genetic local search on the 0/1 knapsack problem. a comparative experiment. Technical Report RA-002/2000, Institute of Computing Science, Poznan University of Technology, Poznan, Poland (2000).  
  12. M. Khabzaoui, C. Dhaenens, A. N'Guessan and E.-G. Talbi, Etude exploratoire des critères de qualité des règles d'association en datamining, in Journées Françaises de Statistique (2003) 583–587.  
  13. M. Khabzaoui, C. Dhaenens and E.-G. Talbi, Association rules discovery for DNA microarray data. Bioinformatics Workshop of SIAM International Conference on Data Mining (2004) 63–71.  
  14. M. Khabzaoui, C. Dhaenens and E.-G. Talbi, A Multicriteria Genetic Algorithm to analyze DNA microarray data, in Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC), Vol. II, pp. 1874–1881, Portland, USA (2004). IEEE Service center.  
  15. J.D. Knowles, D.W. Corne and M.J. Oates, On the assessment of multiobjective approaches to the adaptive distributed database management problem. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature (PPSN VI) (2000) 869–878  
  16. J. Puchinger and G.R. Raidl, Combining metaheuristics and exact algorithms in combinatorial optimization: A survey and classification, in First international Work-Conference on the Interplay between Natural and Artificial Computation (IWINAC)3562 (2005) 41–53.  
  17. P. Smyth and R.M. Goodman, Knowledge Discovery in Databases, Chapter Rule Induction Using Information Theory, G. Piatetsky-Shapiro and J. Frawley (1991) 159–176.  
  18. E.-G. Talbi, A taxonomy of hybrid metaheuristics. Journal of Heuristics8 (2002) 541–564.  
  19. P-N. Tan, V. Kumar and J. Srivastava, Selecting the right interestingness measure for association patterns, in Proceedings of the Eight ACM SIGKDD conference, Edmonton, Canada (2002).  
  20. D.A.Van Veldhuizen and G.B. Lamont, On measuring multiobjective evolutionary algorithm performance, in In 2000 Congress on Evolutionary Computation. Piscataway, New Jersey, Vol. 1, 204–211 (2000).  
  21. K. Wang, S.H.W. Tay and B. Liu, Interestingness-based interval merger for numeric association rules, in edited by Proc. 4th Int. Conf. Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD, R. Agrawal, P. E. Stolorz, and G. Piatetsky-Shapiro, pp. 121–128. AAAI Press, (1998) 27–31. New York, USA.  
  22. M.J. Zaki, Parallel sequence mining on shared-memory machines. J. Parallel and Distrib. Comput.61 (2001) 401–426.  
  23. E. Zitzler and L. Thiele, Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: A comparative case study and the strength pareto approach. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput.3 (1999) 257–271.  

NotesEmbed ?

top

You must be logged in to post comments.

To embed these notes on your page include the following JavaScript code on your page where you want the notes to appear.

Only the controls for the widget will be shown in your chosen language. Notes will be shown in their authored language.

Tells the widget how many notes to show per page. You can cycle through additional notes using the next and previous controls.

    
                

Note: Best practice suggests putting the JavaScript code just before the closing </body> tag.