Analysis of the accuracy and convergence of equation-free projection to a slow manifold

Antonios Zagaris; C. William Gear; Tasso J. Kaper; Yannis G. Kevrekidis

ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis (2009)

  • Volume: 43, Issue: 4, page 757-784
  • ISSN: 0764-583X

Abstract

top
In [C.W. Gear, T.J. Kaper, I.G. Kevrekidis and A. Zagaris, SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst. 4 (2005) 711–732], we developed a class of iterative algorithms within the context of equation-free methods to approximate low-dimensional, attracting, slow manifolds in systems of differential equations with multiple time scales. For user-specified values of a finite number of the observables, the mth member of the class of algorithms ( m = 0 , 1 , ... ) finds iteratively an approximation of the appropriate zero of the (m+1)st time derivative of the remaining variables and uses this root to approximate the location of the point on the slow manifold corresponding to these values of the observables. This article is the first of two articles in which the accuracy and convergence of the iterative algorithms are analyzed. Here, we work directly with fast-slow systems, in which there is an explicit small parameter, ε, measuring the separation of time scales. We show that, for each m = 0 , 1 , ... , the fixed point of the iterative algorithm approximates the slow manifold up to and including terms of 𝒪 ( ε m ) . Moreover, for each m, we identify explicitly the conditions under which the mth iterative algorithm converges to this fixed point. Finally, we show that when the iteration is unstable (or converges slowly) it may be stabilized (or its convergence may be accelerated) by application of the Recursive Projection Method. Alternatively, the Newton-Krylov Generalized Minimal Residual Method may be used. In the subsequent article, we will consider the accuracy and convergence of the iterative algorithms for a broader class of systems – in which there need not be an explicit small parameter – to which the algorithms also apply.

How to cite

top

Zagaris, Antonios, et al. "Analysis of the accuracy and convergence of equation-free projection to a slow manifold." ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis 43.4 (2009): 757-784. <http://eudml.org/doc/250588>.

@article{Zagaris2009,
abstract = { In [C.W. Gear, T.J. Kaper, I.G. Kevrekidis and A. Zagaris, SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst. 4 (2005) 711–732], we developed a class of iterative algorithms within the context of equation-free methods to approximate low-dimensional, attracting, slow manifolds in systems of differential equations with multiple time scales. For user-specified values of a finite number of the observables, the mth member of the class of algorithms ($m = 0, 1, \ldots$) finds iteratively an approximation of the appropriate zero of the (m+1)st time derivative of the remaining variables and uses this root to approximate the location of the point on the slow manifold corresponding to these values of the observables. This article is the first of two articles in which the accuracy and convergence of the iterative algorithms are analyzed. Here, we work directly with fast-slow systems, in which there is an explicit small parameter, ε, measuring the separation of time scales. We show that, for each $m = 0, 1, \ldots$, the fixed point of the iterative algorithm approximates the slow manifold up to and including terms of $\{\mathcal O\}(\varepsilon^m)$. Moreover, for each m, we identify explicitly the conditions under which the mth iterative algorithm converges to this fixed point. Finally, we show that when the iteration is unstable (or converges slowly) it may be stabilized (or its convergence may be accelerated) by application of the Recursive Projection Method. Alternatively, the Newton-Krylov Generalized Minimal Residual Method may be used. In the subsequent article, we will consider the accuracy and convergence of the iterative algorithms for a broader class of systems – in which there need not be an explicit small parameter – to which the algorithms also apply. },
author = {Zagaris, Antonios, Gear, C. William, Kaper, Tasso J., Kevrekidis, Yannis G.},
journal = {ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis},
keywords = {Iterative initialization; DAEs; singular perturbations; legacy codes; inertial manifolds.; iterative initialization; daes; legacy codes; recursive projection method; Newton-Krylov generalized minimal residual method},
language = {eng},
month = {7},
number = {4},
pages = {757-784},
publisher = {EDP Sciences},
title = {Analysis of the accuracy and convergence of equation-free projection to a slow manifold},
url = {http://eudml.org/doc/250588},
volume = {43},
year = {2009},
}

TY - JOUR
AU - Zagaris, Antonios
AU - Gear, C. William
AU - Kaper, Tasso J.
AU - Kevrekidis, Yannis G.
TI - Analysis of the accuracy and convergence of equation-free projection to a slow manifold
JO - ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis
DA - 2009/7//
PB - EDP Sciences
VL - 43
IS - 4
SP - 757
EP - 784
AB - In [C.W. Gear, T.J. Kaper, I.G. Kevrekidis and A. Zagaris, SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst. 4 (2005) 711–732], we developed a class of iterative algorithms within the context of equation-free methods to approximate low-dimensional, attracting, slow manifolds in systems of differential equations with multiple time scales. For user-specified values of a finite number of the observables, the mth member of the class of algorithms ($m = 0, 1, \ldots$) finds iteratively an approximation of the appropriate zero of the (m+1)st time derivative of the remaining variables and uses this root to approximate the location of the point on the slow manifold corresponding to these values of the observables. This article is the first of two articles in which the accuracy and convergence of the iterative algorithms are analyzed. Here, we work directly with fast-slow systems, in which there is an explicit small parameter, ε, measuring the separation of time scales. We show that, for each $m = 0, 1, \ldots$, the fixed point of the iterative algorithm approximates the slow manifold up to and including terms of ${\mathcal O}(\varepsilon^m)$. Moreover, for each m, we identify explicitly the conditions under which the mth iterative algorithm converges to this fixed point. Finally, we show that when the iteration is unstable (or converges slowly) it may be stabilized (or its convergence may be accelerated) by application of the Recursive Projection Method. Alternatively, the Newton-Krylov Generalized Minimal Residual Method may be used. In the subsequent article, we will consider the accuracy and convergence of the iterative algorithms for a broader class of systems – in which there need not be an explicit small parameter – to which the algorithms also apply.
LA - eng
KW - Iterative initialization; DAEs; singular perturbations; legacy codes; inertial manifolds.; iterative initialization; daes; legacy codes; recursive projection method; Newton-Krylov generalized minimal residual method
UR - http://eudml.org/doc/250588
ER -

References

top
  1. G. Browning and H.-O. Kreiss, Problems with different time scales for nonlinear partial differential equations. SIAM J. Appl. Math.42 (1982) 704–718.  
  2. J. Carr, Applications of Centre Manifold Theory, Applied Mathematical Sciences35. Springer-Verlag, New York (1981).  
  3. J. Curry, S.E. Haupt and M.E. Limber, Low-order modeling, initializations, and the slow manifold. Tellus47A (1995) 145–161.  
  4. N. Fenichel, Geometric singular perturbation theory for ordinary differential equations. J. Diff. Eq.31 (1979) 53–98.  
  5. C.W. Gear and I.G. Kevrekidis, Constraint-defined manifolds: a legacy-code approach to low-dimensional computation. J. Sci. Comp.25 (2005) 17–28.  
  6. C.W. Gear, T.J. Kaper, I.G. Kevrekidis and A. Zagaris, Projecting to a slow manifold: singularly perturbed systems and legacy codes. SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst.4 (2005) 711–732.  
  7. S.S. Girimaji, Reduction of large dynamical systems by minimization of evolution rate. Phys. Rev. Lett.82 (1999) 2282–2285.  
  8. C.K.R.T. Jones, Geometric singular perturbation theory, in Dynamical Systems, Montecatini Terme, L. Arnold Ed., Lecture Notes Math.1609, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1994) 44–118.  
  9. H.G. Kaper and T.J. Kaper, Asymptotic analysis of two reduction methods for systems of chemical reactions. Physica D165 (2002) 66–93.  
  10. C.T. Kelley, Iterative Methods for Linear and Nonlinear Equations, Frontiers In Applied Mathematics16. SIAM Publications, Philadelphia (1995).  
  11. I.G. Kevrekidis, C.W. Gear, J.M. Hyman, P.G. Kevrekidis, O. Runborg and C. Theodoropoulos, Equation-free, coarse-grained multiscale computation: enabling microscopic simulators to perform system-level analysis. Commun. Math. Sci.1 (2003) 715–762.  
  12. H.-O. Kreiss, Problems with different time scales for ordinary differential equations. SIAM J. Numer. Anal.16 (1979) 980–998.  
  13. H.-O. Kreiss, Problems with Different Time Scales, in Multiple Time Scales, J.H. Brackbill and B.I. Cohen Eds., Academic Press (1985) 29–57.  
  14. E.N. Lorenz, Attractor sets and quasi-geostrophic equilibrium. J. Atmos. Sci.37 (1980) 1685–1699.  
  15. U. Maas and S.B. Pope, Simplifying chemical kinetics: intrinsic low-dimensional manifolds in composition space. Combust. Flame88 (1992) 239–264.  
  16. P.J. Olver, Applications of Lie Groups to Differential Equations, Graduate Texts in Mathematics107. Springer-Verlag, New York (1986).  
  17. G.M. Shroff and H.B. Keller, Stabilization of unstable procedures: A recursive projection method. SIAM J. Numer. Anal.30 (1993) 1099–1120.  
  18. P. van Leemput, W. Vanroose and D. Roose, Initialization of a Lattice Boltzmann Model with Constrained Runs. Report TW444, Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium (2005).  
  19. P. van Leemput, C. Vandekerckhove, W. Vanroose and D. Roose, Accuracy of hybrid Lattice Boltzmann/Finite Difference schemes for reaction-diffusion systems. Multiscale Model. Sim.6 (2007) 838–857.  
  20. A. Zagaris, H.G. Kaper and T.J. Kaper, Analysis of the Computational Singular Perturbation reduction method for chemical kinetics. J. Nonlin. Sci.14 (2004) 59–91.  
  21. A. Zagaris, H.G. Kaper and T.J. Kaper, Fast and slow dynamics for the Computational Singular Perturbation method. Multiscale Model. Sim.2 (2004) 613–638.  
  22. A. Zagaris, C. Vandekerckhove, C.W. Gear, T.J. Kaper and I.G. Kevrekidis, Stability and stabilization of the constrained runs schemes for equation-free projection to a slow manifold. Numer. Math. (submitted).  

NotesEmbed ?

top

You must be logged in to post comments.

To embed these notes on your page include the following JavaScript code on your page where you want the notes to appear.

Only the controls for the widget will be shown in your chosen language. Notes will be shown in their authored language.

Tells the widget how many notes to show per page. You can cycle through additional notes using the next and previous controls.

    
                

Note: Best practice suggests putting the JavaScript code just before the closing </body> tag.