Meta-analysis techniques applied in prevalence rate estimation

João Paulo Martins; Miguel Felgueiras; Rui Santos

Discussiones Mathematicae Probability and Statistics (2013)

  • Volume: 33, Issue: 1-2, page 79-97
  • ISSN: 1509-9423

Abstract

top
In some cases, the estimators obtained in compound tests have better features than the traditional ones, obtained from individual tests, cf. Sobel and Elashoff (1975), Garner et al. (1989) and Loyer (1983). The bias, the efficiency and the robustness of these estimators are investigated in several papers, e.g. Chen and Swallow (1990), Hung and Swallow (1999) and Lancaster and Keller-McNulty (1998). Thus, the use of estimators based on compound tests not only allows a substantial saving of costs, but they also can (in some situations) be more accurate than the estimators based on the individual tests. Nevertheless, each laboratory produces estimates for the prevalence rate of a given infection using different methodologies, such as halving nested procedures (Sobel and Elashoff, 1975) and square array testing (Kim et al., 2007). The logistic regression or the weighted least squares regression can be used in order to combine different prevalence rate estimates (Chen and Swallow, 1990). In this work some meta-analytical techniques are proposed as an alternative approach. This methodology has the advantage of being quite simple and flexible to account for the error source.

How to cite

top

João Paulo Martins, Miguel Felgueiras, and Rui Santos. "Meta-analysis techniques applied in prevalence rate estimation." Discussiones Mathematicae Probability and Statistics 33.1-2 (2013): 79-97. <http://eudml.org/doc/270868>.

@article{JoãoPauloMartins2013,
abstract = { In some cases, the estimators obtained in compound tests have better features than the traditional ones, obtained from individual tests, cf. Sobel and Elashoff (1975), Garner et al. (1989) and Loyer (1983). The bias, the efficiency and the robustness of these estimators are investigated in several papers, e.g. Chen and Swallow (1990), Hung and Swallow (1999) and Lancaster and Keller-McNulty (1998). Thus, the use of estimators based on compound tests not only allows a substantial saving of costs, but they also can (in some situations) be more accurate than the estimators based on the individual tests. Nevertheless, each laboratory produces estimates for the prevalence rate of a given infection using different methodologies, such as halving nested procedures (Sobel and Elashoff, 1975) and square array testing (Kim et al., 2007). The logistic regression or the weighted least squares regression can be used in order to combine different prevalence rate estimates (Chen and Swallow, 1990). In this work some meta-analytical techniques are proposed as an alternative approach. This methodology has the advantage of being quite simple and flexible to account for the error source. },
author = {João Paulo Martins, Miguel Felgueiras, Rui Santos},
journal = {Discussiones Mathematicae Probability and Statistics},
keywords = {compound tests; estimation of prevalence; meta-analysis; sensitivity; specificity},
language = {eng},
number = {1-2},
pages = {79-97},
title = {Meta-analysis techniques applied in prevalence rate estimation},
url = {http://eudml.org/doc/270868},
volume = {33},
year = {2013},
}

TY - JOUR
AU - João Paulo Martins
AU - Miguel Felgueiras
AU - Rui Santos
TI - Meta-analysis techniques applied in prevalence rate estimation
JO - Discussiones Mathematicae Probability and Statistics
PY - 2013
VL - 33
IS - 1-2
SP - 79
EP - 97
AB - In some cases, the estimators obtained in compound tests have better features than the traditional ones, obtained from individual tests, cf. Sobel and Elashoff (1975), Garner et al. (1989) and Loyer (1983). The bias, the efficiency and the robustness of these estimators are investigated in several papers, e.g. Chen and Swallow (1990), Hung and Swallow (1999) and Lancaster and Keller-McNulty (1998). Thus, the use of estimators based on compound tests not only allows a substantial saving of costs, but they also can (in some situations) be more accurate than the estimators based on the individual tests. Nevertheless, each laboratory produces estimates for the prevalence rate of a given infection using different methodologies, such as halving nested procedures (Sobel and Elashoff, 1975) and square array testing (Kim et al., 2007). The logistic regression or the weighted least squares regression can be used in order to combine different prevalence rate estimates (Chen and Swallow, 1990). In this work some meta-analytical techniques are proposed as an alternative approach. This methodology has the advantage of being quite simple and flexible to account for the error source.
LA - eng
KW - compound tests; estimation of prevalence; meta-analysis; sensitivity; specificity
UR - http://eudml.org/doc/270868
ER -

References

top
  1. [1] F. Anscombe, The transformation of poisson, binomial and negative-binomial data, Biometrika 35 (1948) 246-254. Zbl0032.03702
  2. [2] T. Berger, J.W. Mandell and P. Subrahmanya, Maximally efficient two-stage screening, Biometrics 56 (2000) 833-840. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00833.x. Zbl1060.62581
  3. [3] B.J. Biggerstaff and R.L. Tweedie, Incorporating Variability in Estimates of Heterogeneity in the Random Effects Model in Meta-analysis, Stat. Med. 16 (1997) 753-768. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19970415)16:7<753::AID-SIM494>3.0.CO;2-G. 
  4. [4] C.R. Bilder, B. Zang, F. Schaarschmidt and J.M. Tebbs, binGroup: a package for group testing, The R Journal 2 (2010) 56-60. 
  5. [5] C.L. Chen and W.H. Swallow, Using group testing to estimate a proportion, and to test the binomial model, Biometrics 46 (1990) 1035-1046. doi: 10.2307/2532446. 
  6. [6] W.G. Cochran, The combination of estimates from different experiments, Biometrics 10 (1954) 101-129. doi: 10.2307/3001666. 
  7. [7] R. DerSimonian and N. Laird, Meta-analysis in clinical trials, Control. Clin. Trials 7 (1986) 177-178. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2. 
  8. [8] R. Dorfman, The detection of defective members in large populations, Ann. Math. Statistics 14 (1943) 436-440. doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177731363. 
  9. [9] H.M. Finuncan, The blood testing problem, Appl. Stat. 13 (1964) 43-50. doi: 10.2307/2985222. 
  10. [10] F.C. Garner, M.A. Stapanian, E.A. Yfantis and L.R. Williams, Probability Estimation With Sample Compositing Techniques, Journal of Official Statistics 5 (1989) 365-374. 
  11. [11] J. Hartung, G. Knapp and B.K. Sinha, Statistical Meta-Analysis with Applications (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, 2008). doi: 10.1002/9780470386347. Zbl1258.62099
  12. [12] P. Holland, Covariance stabilizing transformations, Ann. Stat. 14 (1973) 84-92. doi: 10.1214/aos/1193342384. Zbl0253.60025
  13. [13] J.M. Hughes-Oliver, Pooling experiments for blood screening and drug discovery, in: Screening - Methods for Experimentation in Industry, Drug Discovery, and Genetics, Dean and Lewis (Ed(s)), (New York: Springer, 2006) 48-68. 
  14. [14] M. Hung and W.H. Swallow, Robustness of Group Testing in the Estimation of Proportions, Biometrics 55 (1999) 231-237. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.1999.00231.x. Zbl1059.62605
  15. [15] F.K. Hwang, Group testing with a dilution effect, Biometrika 63 (1976) 671-673. doi: 10.1093/biomet/63.3.671. Zbl0336.62087
  16. [16] N. Johnson, S. Kotz and X. Wu, Inspection Errors for Attributes in Quality Control (Chapman and Hall Ltd., NewYork, 1991). 
  17. [17] N. Johnson, S. Kotz and N. Balakrishnan, Continuous Univariate Distributions, Vol. 2 (John Wiley & Sons, NewYork, 1993). 
  18. [18] H. Kim, M. Hudgens, J. Dreyfuss, D. Westreich and C. Pilcher, Comparison of group testing algorithms for case identification in the presence of testing errors, Biometrics 63 (2007) 1152-1163. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00817.x. Zbl1136.62389
  19. [19] E. Kulinskaya, S. Morgenthaler and R.G. Staudte, Meta Analysis: a guide to calibrating and combining statistical evidence (Wiley, Chichester, 2008). Zbl1183.62004
  20. [20] V.A. Lancaster and S. Keller-McNulty, A Review of Composite Sampling Methods, JASA 93 (1998) 1216-1230. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1998.10473781. 
  21. [21] S.C. Liu, K.S. Chiang, C.H. Lin, W.C. Chung, S.H. Lin and T.C. Yang, Cost analysis in choosing group size when group testing for Potato virus Y in the presence of classification errors, Ann. Appl. Biol. 159 (2011) 491-502. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7348.2011.00513.x. 
  22. [22] M.W. Loyer, Bad probability, good statistics, and group testing for binomial estimation, Am. Stat. 37 (1983) 57-59. doi: 10.1080/00031305.1983.10483091. 
  23. [23] A.L. Rukhin, B.J. Biggerstaff and M.G. Vangel, Restricted maximum likelihood estimation of a common mean and the Mandel-Paul algorithm, J. Stat. Plan. Infer. 83 (2000) 319-330. doi: 10.1016/S0378-3758(99)00098-1. Zbl0943.62024
  24. [24] R. Santos, D. Pestana and J.P. Martins, Extensions of Dorfman's theory, in: Selected Papers of SPE 2010, Portuguese Statistical Society (Ed(s)), (New York: Springer, 2012) in print. 
  25. [25] K.M. Sobel and R.M. Elashoff, Group testing with a new goal, estimation, Biometrika 62 (1975) 181-193. doi: 10.1093/biomet/62.1.181. Zbl0308.62094
  26. [26] A. Sterret, On the detection of defective members of large populations, Ann. Math. Statistics 28 (1957) 1033-1036. doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177706807. 
  27. [27] L.M. Wein and S.A. Zenios, Pooled testing for HIV screening: capturing the dilution effect, Oper. Res. 44 (1996) 543-569. doi: 10.1287/opre.44.4.543. Zbl0865.90091
  28. [28] M. Xie, K. Tatsuoka, J. Sacks and S.S. Young, Group testing with blockers and synergism, JASA 96 (2001) 92-102. doi: 10.1198/016214501750333009. 
  29. [29] S.A. Zenios and L.M. Wein, Pooled testing for HIV prevalence estimation exploiting the dilution effect, Stat. Med. 17 (1998) 1447-1467. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980715)17:13<1447::AID-SIM862>3.0.CO;2-K. 

NotesEmbed ?

top

You must be logged in to post comments.

To embed these notes on your page include the following JavaScript code on your page where you want the notes to appear.

Only the controls for the widget will be shown in your chosen language. Notes will be shown in their authored language.

Tells the widget how many notes to show per page. You can cycle through additional notes using the next and previous controls.

    
                

                
Note: Best practice suggests putting the JavaScript code just before the closing </body> tag.