On annealed elliptic Green's function estimates

Daniel Marahrens; Felix Otto

Mathematica Bohemica (2015)

  • Volume: 140, Issue: 4, page 489-506
  • ISSN: 0862-7959

Abstract

top
We consider a random, uniformly elliptic coefficient field a on the lattice d . The distribution · of the coefficient field is assumed to be stationary. Delmotte and Deuschel showed that the gradient and second mixed derivative of the parabolic Green’s function G ( t , x , y ) satisfy optimal annealed estimates which are L 2 and L 1 , respectively, in probability, i.e., they obtained bounds on | x G ( t , x , y ) | 2 1 / 2 and | x y G ( t , x , y ) | . In particular, the elliptic Green’s function G ( x , y ) satisfies optimal annealed bounds. In their recent work, the authors extended these elliptic bounds to higher moments, i.e., L p in probability for all p < . In this note, we present a new argument that relies purely on elliptic theory to derive the elliptic estimates for | x G ( x , y ) | 2 1 / 2 and | x y G ( x , y ) | .

How to cite

top

Marahrens, Daniel, and Otto, Felix. "On annealed elliptic Green's function estimates." Mathematica Bohemica 140.4 (2015): 489-506. <http://eudml.org/doc/271826>.

@article{Marahrens2015,
abstract = {We consider a random, uniformly elliptic coefficient field $a$ on the lattice $\mathbb \{Z\}^d$. The distribution $\langle \cdot \rangle $ of the coefficient field is assumed to be stationary. Delmotte and Deuschel showed that the gradient and second mixed derivative of the parabolic Green’s function $G(t,x,y)$ satisfy optimal annealed estimates which are $L^2$ and $L^1$, respectively, in probability, i.e., they obtained bounds on $\smash\{\langle |\nabla _x G(t,x,y)|^2\rangle ^\{\{1\}/\{2\}\}\}$ and $\langle |\nabla _x \nabla _y G(t,x,y)|\rangle $. In particular, the elliptic Green’s function $G(x,y)$ satisfies optimal annealed bounds. In their recent work, the authors extended these elliptic bounds to higher moments, i.e., $L^p$ in probability for all $p<\infty $. In this note, we present a new argument that relies purely on elliptic theory to derive the elliptic estimates for $\langle |\nabla _x G(x,y)|^2\rangle ^\{\{1\}/\{2\}\}$ and $\langle |\nabla _x \nabla _y G(x,y)|\rangle $.},
author = {Marahrens, Daniel, Otto, Felix},
journal = {Mathematica Bohemica},
keywords = {stochastic homogenization; elliptic equation; Green’s function on $\mathbb \{Z\}^d$; annealed estimate},
language = {eng},
number = {4},
pages = {489-506},
publisher = {Institute of Mathematics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic},
title = {On annealed elliptic Green's function estimates},
url = {http://eudml.org/doc/271826},
volume = {140},
year = {2015},
}

TY - JOUR
AU - Marahrens, Daniel
AU - Otto, Felix
TI - On annealed elliptic Green's function estimates
JO - Mathematica Bohemica
PY - 2015
PB - Institute of Mathematics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic
VL - 140
IS - 4
SP - 489
EP - 506
AB - We consider a random, uniformly elliptic coefficient field $a$ on the lattice $\mathbb {Z}^d$. The distribution $\langle \cdot \rangle $ of the coefficient field is assumed to be stationary. Delmotte and Deuschel showed that the gradient and second mixed derivative of the parabolic Green’s function $G(t,x,y)$ satisfy optimal annealed estimates which are $L^2$ and $L^1$, respectively, in probability, i.e., they obtained bounds on $\smash{\langle |\nabla _x G(t,x,y)|^2\rangle ^{{1}/{2}}}$ and $\langle |\nabla _x \nabla _y G(t,x,y)|\rangle $. In particular, the elliptic Green’s function $G(x,y)$ satisfies optimal annealed bounds. In their recent work, the authors extended these elliptic bounds to higher moments, i.e., $L^p$ in probability for all $p<\infty $. In this note, we present a new argument that relies purely on elliptic theory to derive the elliptic estimates for $\langle |\nabla _x G(x,y)|^2\rangle ^{{1}/{2}}$ and $\langle |\nabla _x \nabla _y G(x,y)|\rangle $.
LA - eng
KW - stochastic homogenization; elliptic equation; Green’s function on $\mathbb {Z}^d$; annealed estimate
UR - http://eudml.org/doc/271826
ER -

References

top
  1. Aronson, D. G., 10.1090/S0002-9904-1967-11830-5, Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 73 (1967), 890-896. (1967) Zbl0153.42002MR0217444DOI10.1090/S0002-9904-1967-11830-5
  2. Delmotte, T., 10.4171/RMI/254, Rev. Mat. Iberoam. 15 (1999), 181-232. (1999) Zbl0922.60060MR1681641DOI10.4171/RMI/254
  3. Delmotte, T., Deuschel, J.-D., 10.1007/s00440-005-0430-y, Probab. Theory Relat. Fields 133 (2005), 358-390. (2005) Zbl1083.60082MR2198017DOI10.1007/s00440-005-0430-y
  4. Lamacz, A., Neukamm, S., Otto, F., Moment bounds for the corrector in stochastic homogenization of a percolation model, Electron J. Probab. 20 Article 106, 30 pages, http://ejp.ejpecp.org/article/view/3618 (2015). (2015) Zbl1326.39015MR3418538
  5. Marahrens, D., Otto, F., 10.1007/s00440-014-0598-0, (to appear) in Probab. Theory Relat. Fields, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00440-014-0598-0. MR3418749DOI10.1007/s00440-014-0598-0
  6. Nash, J. F., 10.2307/2372841, Am. J. Math. 80 (1958), 931-954. (1958) Zbl0096.06902MR0100158DOI10.2307/2372841

NotesEmbed ?

top

You must be logged in to post comments.

To embed these notes on your page include the following JavaScript code on your page where you want the notes to appear.

Only the controls for the widget will be shown in your chosen language. Notes will be shown in their authored language.

Tells the widget how many notes to show per page. You can cycle through additional notes using the next and previous controls.

    
                

Note: Best practice suggests putting the JavaScript code just before the closing </body> tag.