A Generalized Model of PAC Learning and its Applicability
Thomas Brodag; Steffen Herbold; Stephan Waack
RAIRO - Theoretical Informatics and Applications - Informatique Théorique et Applications (2014)
- Volume: 48, Issue: 2, page 209-245
- ISSN: 0988-3754
Access Full Article
topAbstract
topHow to cite
topBrodag, Thomas, Herbold, Steffen, and Waack, Stephan. "A Generalized Model of PAC Learning and its Applicability." RAIRO - Theoretical Informatics and Applications - Informatique Théorique et Applications 48.2 (2014): 209-245. <http://eudml.org/doc/273063>.
@article{Brodag2014,
abstract = {We combine a new data model, where the random classification is subjected to rather weak restrictions which in turn are based on the Mammen−Tsybakov [E. Mammen and A.B. Tsybakov, Ann. Statis. 27 (1999) 1808–1829; A.B. Tsybakov, Ann. Statis. 32 (2004) 135–166.] small margin conditions, and the statistical query (SQ) model due to Kearns [M.J. Kearns, J. ACM 45 (1998) 983–1006] to what we refer to as PAC + SQ model. We generalize the class conditional constant noise (CCCN) model introduced by Decatur [S.E. Decatur, in ICML ’97: Proc. of the Fourteenth Int. Conf. on Machine Learn. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. San Francisco, CA, USA (1997) 83–91] to the noise model orthogonal to a set of query functions. We show that every polynomial time PAC + SQ learning algorithm can be efficiently simulated provided that the random noise rate is orthogonal to the query functions used by the algorithm given the target concept. Furthermore, we extend the constant-partition classification noise (CPCN) model due to Decatur [S.E. Decatur, in ICML ’97: Proc. of the Fourteenth Int. Conf. on Machine Learn. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. San Francisco, CA, USA (1997) 83–91] to what we call the constant-partition piecewise orthogonal (CPPO) noise model. We show how statistical queries can be simulated in the CPPO scenario, given the partition is known to the learner. We show how to practically use PAC + SQ simulators in the noise model orthogonal to the query space by presenting two examples from bioinformatics and software engineering. This way, we demonstrate that our new noise model is realistic.},
author = {Brodag, Thomas, Herbold, Steffen, Waack, Stephan},
journal = {RAIRO - Theoretical Informatics and Applications - Informatique Théorique et Applications},
keywords = {PAC learning with classification noise; Mammen−Tsybakov small margin conditions; statistical queries; noise model orthogonal to a set of query functions; bioinformatics; software engineering; Mammen-Tsybakov small margin conditions},
language = {eng},
number = {2},
pages = {209-245},
publisher = {EDP-Sciences},
title = {A Generalized Model of PAC Learning and its Applicability},
url = {http://eudml.org/doc/273063},
volume = {48},
year = {2014},
}
TY - JOUR
AU - Brodag, Thomas
AU - Herbold, Steffen
AU - Waack, Stephan
TI - A Generalized Model of PAC Learning and its Applicability
JO - RAIRO - Theoretical Informatics and Applications - Informatique Théorique et Applications
PY - 2014
PB - EDP-Sciences
VL - 48
IS - 2
SP - 209
EP - 245
AB - We combine a new data model, where the random classification is subjected to rather weak restrictions which in turn are based on the Mammen−Tsybakov [E. Mammen and A.B. Tsybakov, Ann. Statis. 27 (1999) 1808–1829; A.B. Tsybakov, Ann. Statis. 32 (2004) 135–166.] small margin conditions, and the statistical query (SQ) model due to Kearns [M.J. Kearns, J. ACM 45 (1998) 983–1006] to what we refer to as PAC + SQ model. We generalize the class conditional constant noise (CCCN) model introduced by Decatur [S.E. Decatur, in ICML ’97: Proc. of the Fourteenth Int. Conf. on Machine Learn. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. San Francisco, CA, USA (1997) 83–91] to the noise model orthogonal to a set of query functions. We show that every polynomial time PAC + SQ learning algorithm can be efficiently simulated provided that the random noise rate is orthogonal to the query functions used by the algorithm given the target concept. Furthermore, we extend the constant-partition classification noise (CPCN) model due to Decatur [S.E. Decatur, in ICML ’97: Proc. of the Fourteenth Int. Conf. on Machine Learn. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. San Francisco, CA, USA (1997) 83–91] to what we call the constant-partition piecewise orthogonal (CPPO) noise model. We show how statistical queries can be simulated in the CPPO scenario, given the partition is known to the learner. We show how to practically use PAC + SQ simulators in the noise model orthogonal to the query space by presenting two examples from bioinformatics and software engineering. This way, we demonstrate that our new noise model is realistic.
LA - eng
KW - PAC learning with classification noise; Mammen−Tsybakov small margin conditions; statistical queries; noise model orthogonal to a set of query functions; bioinformatics; software engineering; Mammen-Tsybakov small margin conditions
UR - http://eudml.org/doc/273063
ER -
References
top- [1] D.W. Aha and D. Kibler, Instance-based learning algorithms. Machine Learn. (1991) 37–66. Zbl0709.68044
- [2] D. Angluin and P. Laird, Learning from noisy examples. Machine Learn.2 (1988) 343–370.
- [3] http://httpd.apache.org/ (2011).
- [4] J.A. Aslam, Noise Tolerant Algorithms for Learning and Searching, Ph.D. thesis. MIT (1995).
- [5] J.A. Aslam and S.E. Decatur, Specification and Simulation of Statistical Query Algorithms for Efficiency and Noise Tolerance. J. Comput. Syst. Sci.56 (1998) 191–208. Zbl0912.68063MR1629619
- [6] P.L. Bartlett, S. Boucheron and G. Lugosi, Model selection and error estimation. Machine Learn.48 (2002) 85–113. Zbl0998.68117
- [7] P.L. Bartlett, M.I. Jordan and J.D. McAuliffe, Convexity, classification, and risk bounds. J. Amer. Stat. Assoc.1001 (2006) 138–156. Zbl1118.62330MR2268032
- [8] P.L. Bartlett and S. Mendelson, Rademacher and Gaussian complexities: Risk bounds and structural results, in 14th COLT and 5th EuroCOLT (2001) 224–240. Zbl0992.68106MR2042038
- [9] P.L. Bartlett and S. Mendelson, Rademacher and Gaussian complexities: Risk bounds and structural results. J. Mach. Learn. Res. (2002) 463–482. Zbl1084.68549MR1984026
- [10] A. Blumer, A. Ehrenfeucht, D. Haussler and M.K. Warmuth, Learnabilty and the Vapnik−Chervonenkis dimension. J. ACM 36 (1989) 929–969. Zbl0697.68079MR1072253
- [11] O. Bousquet, S. Boucheron and G. Lugosi, Introduction to statistical learning theory, in Adv. Lect. Machine Learn. (2003) 169–207. Zbl1120.68428
- [12] O. Bousquet, S. Boucheron and G. Lugosi, Introduction to statistical learning theory, in Adv. Lect. Machine Learn., vol. 3176 of Lect. Notes in Artificial Intelligence. Springer, Heidelberg (2004) 169–207. Zbl1120.68428
- [13] Th. Brodag, PAC-Lernen zur Insolvenzerkennung und Hotspot-Identifikation, Ph.D. thesis, Ph.D. Programme in Computer Science of the Georg-August University School of Science GAUSS (2008).
- [14] N. Cesa-Bianchi, S. Shalev-Shwartz and O. Shamir, Online learning of noisy data. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory57 (2011) 7907–7931. MR2895368
- [15] S.E. Decatur, Learning in hybrid noise environments using statistical queries, in Fifth International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics. Lect. Notes Statis. Springer (1993).
- [16] S.E. Decatur, Statistical Queries and Faulty PAC Oracles. COLT (1993) 262–268.
- [17] S.E. Decatur, Efficient Learning from Faulty Data, Ph.D. thesis. Harvard University (1995). MR2693616
- [18] S.E. Decatur, PAC learning with constant-partition classification noise and applications to decision tree induction, in ICML ’97: Proc. of the Fourteenth Int. Conf. on Machine Learn. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. San Francisco, CA, USA (1997) 83–91.
- [19] S.E. Decatur and R. Gennaro, On learning from noisy and incomplete examples, in COLT (1995) 353–360.
- [20] L. Devroye, L. Györfi and G. Lugosi, A Probabilistic Theory of Pattern Recognition. Springer, New York (1997). Zbl0853.68150MR1383093
- [21] http://www.eclipse.org/jdt/ (2011).
- [22] http://www.eclipe.org/platform/ (2011).
- [23] N. Fenton and S.L. Pfleeger, Software metrics: a rigorous and practical approach. PWS Publishing Co. Boston, MA, USA (1997). Zbl0813.68061
- [24] D. Haussler and D. Haussler, Can pac learning algorithms tolerate random attribute noise? Algorithmica14 (1995) 70–84. Zbl0837.68094MR1329816
- [25] I. Halperin, H. Wolfson and R. Nussinov, Protein-protein interactions coupling of structurally conserved residues and of hot spots across interfaces. implications for docking. Structure 12 (2004) 1027–1036.
- [26] D. Haussler, Quantifying inductive bias: AI learning algorithms and Valiant’s learning framework. Artificial Intelligence36 (1988) 177–221. Zbl0651.68104MR960589
- [27] D. Haussler, M.J. Kearns, N. Littlestone and M.K. Warmuth, Equivalence of models for polynomial learnability. Inform. Comput.95 (1991) 129–161. Zbl0743.68115MR1138115
- [28] D. Haussler, D. Haussler and D. Haussler, Calculation and optimization of thresholds for sets of software metrics. Empirical Software Engrg. (2011) 1–30. 10.1007/s10664-011-9162-z. Zbl0762.68050
- [29] International Organization of Standardization (ISO) and International Electro-technical Commission (ISEC), Geneva, Switzerland. Software engineering – Product quality, Parts 1-4 (2001-2004).
- [30] G. John and P. Langley, Estimating continuous distributions in bayesian classifiers, In Proc. of the Eleventh Conf. on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann (1995) 338–345.
- [31] M.J. Kearns, Efficient noise-tolerant learning from statistical queries. J. ACM45 (1998) 983–1006. Zbl1065.68605MR1678849
- [32] M.J. Kearns and M. Li, Learning in the presence of malicious errors. SIAM J. Comput.22 (1993) 807–837. Zbl0789.68118MR1227763
- [33] M.J. Kearns and R.E. Schapire, Efficient Distribution-Free Learning of Probabilistic Concepts. J. Comput. Syst. Sci.48 (1994) 464–497. Zbl0822.68093MR1279411
- [34] V. Koltchinskii, Rademacher penalties and structural risk minimization. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory47 (2001) 1902–1914. Zbl1008.62614MR1842526
- [35] E. Mammen and A.B. Tsybakov, Smooth discrimination analysis. Ann. Statis.27 (1999) 1808–1829. Zbl0961.62058MR1765618
- [36] P. Massart, Some applications of concentration inequalities to statistics. Annales de la Faculté des Sciences de Toulouse, volume spécial dédiaé` Michel Talagrand (2000) 245–303. Zbl0986.62002MR1813803
- [37] S. Mendelson, Rademacher averages and phase transitions in Glivenko-Cantelli classes. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory48 (2002) 1977–1991. Zbl1059.60027MR1872178
- [38] I.S. Moreira, P.A. Fernandes and M.J. Ramos, Hot spots – A review of the protein-protein interface determinant amino-acid residues. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 68 (2007) 803–812.
- [39] D.F. Nettleton, A. Orriols-Puig and A. Fornells, A study of the effect of different types of noise on the precision of supervised learning techniques. Artif. Intell. Rev.33 (2010) 275–306.
- [40] Y. Ofran and B. Rost, ISIS: interaction sites identified from sequence. Bioinform.23 (2007) 13–16.
- [41] Y. Ofran and B. Rost, Protein-protein interaction hotspots carved into sequences. PLoS Comput. Biol. 3 (2007).
- [42] J.C. Platt, Fast training of support vector machines using sequential minimal optimization, in Advances in kernel methods. Edited by B. Schölkopf, Ch.J.C. Burges and A.J. Smola. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA (1999) 185–208.
- [43] J. Ross Quinlan, C4.5: programs for machine learning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA (1993).
- [44] L. Ralaivola, F. Denis and Ch.N. Magnan, CN = CPCN, in ICML ’06: Proc. of the 23rd int. Conf. Machine learn. ACM New York, NY, USA (2006) 721–728.
- [45] B. Schölkopf and A.J. Smola, Learning with Kernels. MIT Press (2002). Zbl1019.68094
- [46] K.S. Thorn and A.A. Bogan, Asedb: a database of alanine mutations and their effects on the free energy of binding in protein interactions. Bioinformatics17 (2001) 284–285.
- [47] A.B. Tsybakov, Optimal aggregation of classifiers in statistical learning. Ann. Statis.32 (2004) 135–166. Zbl1105.62353MR2051002
- [48] L. Valiant, A theory of learnability. Communic. ACM27 (1984) 1134–1142. Zbl0587.68077
- [49] L. Valiant, Learning disjunctions of conjunctions, in Proc. of 9th Int. Joint Conf. Artificial Int. (1985) 560–566.
NotesEmbed ?
topTo embed these notes on your page include the following JavaScript code on your page where you want the notes to appear.