The comparison of three models applied to the analysis of a three-factor trial on hybrid maize (Zea maysL.) cultivars
Piotr Szulc; Iwona Mejza; Katarzyna Ambroży-Deręgowska; Kamila Nowosad; Jan Bocianowski
Biometrical Letters (2016)
- Volume: 53, Issue: 1, page 47-57
- ISSN: 1896-3811
Access Full Article
top
Abstract
topHow to cite
topPiotr Szulc, et al. "The comparison of three models applied to the analysis of a three-factor trial on hybrid maize (Zea maysL.) cultivars." Biometrical Letters 53.1 (2016): 47-57. <http://eudml.org/doc/281207>.
@article{PiotrSzulc2016,
abstract = {The aim of this paper is to present the comparison of three models applied to the analysis of a one-year study of protein yield for two types of hybrid maize cultivars under different forms of nitrogen fertilizer and doses of magnesium. The field trial was conducted in 2010 at the Agricultural Experimental Station in Swadzim (Poland). The results obtained were analyzed in terms of three randomization-derived models of observations. Consideration was given to three mixed systems, which are combinations of split-plot design, split-block design and randomized complete block design. The relative efficiency of the designs with respect to estimation of some comparisons among treatment combination effects was examined. Particular attention was paid to the interaction between cultivars and nitrogen fertilization.},
author = {Piotr Szulc, Iwona Mejza, Katarzyna Ambroży-Deręgowska, Kamila Nowosad, Jan Bocianowski},
journal = {Biometrical Letters},
keywords = {magnesium; protein yield; randomized complete block design; relative efficiency; types of nitrogen fertilizer; split-block design; split-plot design; Zea mays L},
language = {eng},
number = {1},
pages = {47-57},
title = {The comparison of three models applied to the analysis of a three-factor trial on hybrid maize (Zea maysL.) cultivars},
url = {http://eudml.org/doc/281207},
volume = {53},
year = {2016},
}
TY - JOUR
AU - Piotr Szulc
AU - Iwona Mejza
AU - Katarzyna Ambroży-Deręgowska
AU - Kamila Nowosad
AU - Jan Bocianowski
TI - The comparison of three models applied to the analysis of a three-factor trial on hybrid maize (Zea maysL.) cultivars
JO - Biometrical Letters
PY - 2016
VL - 53
IS - 1
SP - 47
EP - 57
AB - The aim of this paper is to present the comparison of three models applied to the analysis of a one-year study of protein yield for two types of hybrid maize cultivars under different forms of nitrogen fertilizer and doses of magnesium. The field trial was conducted in 2010 at the Agricultural Experimental Station in Swadzim (Poland). The results obtained were analyzed in terms of three randomization-derived models of observations. Consideration was given to three mixed systems, which are combinations of split-plot design, split-block design and randomized complete block design. The relative efficiency of the designs with respect to estimation of some comparisons among treatment combination effects was examined. Particular attention was paid to the interaction between cultivars and nitrogen fertilization.
LA - eng
KW - magnesium; protein yield; randomized complete block design; relative efficiency; types of nitrogen fertilizer; split-block design; split-plot design; Zea mays L
UR - http://eudml.org/doc/281207
ER -
References
top- Ambroży K., Mejza I. (2012): Modeling data from three-factor experiments with split units set up in designs with different block structures (in Polish). Biul. IHAR 264: 23-31.
- Ambroży K., Mejza I., Mejza S. (2014): On the relative efficiency of split-split-plot design to split-plot × split-block design. Colloquium Biometricum 44: 69-78. Zbl1134.62351
- Federer W.T., King F. (2007): Variations on Split Plot and Split Block Experiment Designs. Wiley. New Jersey. Zbl1144.62061
- LeClerg E.L., Leonard W.H., Clark A.G. (1962): Field plot technique. Burgess, Minneapolis.
- Szulc P., Bocianowski J. (2012): The effect of soil supplementation with different forms of nitrogen fertiliser on modification of generative yield in two different types of maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids. Polish Journal of Agronomy 11: 52-64.
NotesEmbed ?
topYou must be logged in to post comments.
To embed these notes on your page include the following JavaScript code on your page where you want the notes to appear.