# Corrigendum for "Weierstrass Points with first Non-Gap four on a Double Covering of a Hyperelliptic Curve"

Serdica Mathematical Journal (2006)

- Volume: 32, Issue: 4, page 375-378
- ISSN: 1310-6600

## Access Full Article

top## Abstract

top## How to cite

topKomeda, Jiryo, and Ohbuci, Akira. "Corrigendum for "Weierstrass Points with first Non-Gap four on a Double Covering of a Hyperelliptic Curve"." Serdica Mathematical Journal 32.4 (2006): 375-378. <http://eudml.org/doc/281485>.

@article{Komeda2006,

abstract = {In the proof of Lemma 3.1 in [1] we need to show that we may take the two points p and q with p ≠ q such that
p+q+(b-2)g21(C′)∼2(q1+… +qb-1)
where q1,…,qb-1 are points of C′, but in the paper [1] we did not show that p ≠ q. Moreover, we hadn't been able to prove this using the method of our paper [1]. So we must add some more assumption to Lemma 3.1 and rewrite the statements of our paper after Lemma 3.1. The following is the correct version of Lemma 3.1 in [1] with its proof.},

author = {Komeda, Jiryo, Ohbuci, Akira},

journal = {Serdica Mathematical Journal},

keywords = {Weierstrass Points; Hyperelliptic Curve; Corrigendum},

language = {eng},

number = {4},

pages = {375-378},

publisher = {Institute of Mathematics and Informatics Bulgarian Academy of Sciences},

title = {Corrigendum for "Weierstrass Points with first Non-Gap four on a Double Covering of a Hyperelliptic Curve"},

url = {http://eudml.org/doc/281485},

volume = {32},

year = {2006},

}

TY - JOUR

AU - Komeda, Jiryo

AU - Ohbuci, Akira

TI - Corrigendum for "Weierstrass Points with first Non-Gap four on a Double Covering of a Hyperelliptic Curve"

JO - Serdica Mathematical Journal

PY - 2006

PB - Institute of Mathematics and Informatics Bulgarian Academy of Sciences

VL - 32

IS - 4

SP - 375

EP - 378

AB - In the proof of Lemma 3.1 in [1] we need to show that we may take the two points p and q with p ≠ q such that
p+q+(b-2)g21(C′)∼2(q1+… +qb-1)
where q1,…,qb-1 are points of C′, but in the paper [1] we did not show that p ≠ q. Moreover, we hadn't been able to prove this using the method of our paper [1]. So we must add some more assumption to Lemma 3.1 and rewrite the statements of our paper after Lemma 3.1. The following is the correct version of Lemma 3.1 in [1] with its proof.

LA - eng

KW - Weierstrass Points; Hyperelliptic Curve; Corrigendum

UR - http://eudml.org/doc/281485

ER -

## NotesEmbed ?

topTo embed these notes on your page include the following JavaScript code on your page where you want the notes to appear.