On families of Lindelöf and related subspaces of 2 ω

Lúcia Junqueira; Piotr Koszmider

Fundamenta Mathematicae (2001)

  • Volume: 169, Issue: 3, page 205-231
  • ISSN: 0016-2736

Abstract

top
We consider the families of all subspaces of size ω₁ of 2 ω (or of a compact zero-dimensional space X of weight ω₁ in general) which are normal, have the Lindelöf property or are closed under limits of convergent ω₁-sequences. Various relations among these families modulo the club filter in [ X ] ω are shown to be consistently possible. One of the main tools is dealing with a subspace of the form X ∩ M for an elementary submodel M of size ω₁. Various results with this flavor are obtained. Another tool used is forcing and in this case various preservation or nonpreservation results of topological and combinatorial properties are proved. In particular we prove that there may be no c.c.c. forcing which destroys the Lindelöf property of compact spaces, answering a question of Juhász. Many related questions are formulated.

How to cite

top

Lúcia Junqueira, and Piotr Koszmider. "On families of Lindelöf and related subspaces of $2^{ω₁}$." Fundamenta Mathematicae 169.3 (2001): 205-231. <http://eudml.org/doc/281938>.

@article{LúciaJunqueira2001,
abstract = {We consider the families of all subspaces of size ω₁ of $2^\{ω₁\}$ (or of a compact zero-dimensional space X of weight ω₁ in general) which are normal, have the Lindelöf property or are closed under limits of convergent ω₁-sequences. Various relations among these families modulo the club filter in $[X]^\{ω₁\}$ are shown to be consistently possible. One of the main tools is dealing with a subspace of the form X ∩ M for an elementary submodel M of size ω₁. Various results with this flavor are obtained. Another tool used is forcing and in this case various preservation or nonpreservation results of topological and combinatorial properties are proved. In particular we prove that there may be no c.c.c. forcing which destroys the Lindelöf property of compact spaces, answering a question of Juhász. Many related questions are formulated.},
author = {Lúcia Junqueira, Piotr Koszmider},
journal = {Fundamenta Mathematicae},
keywords = {Lindelöf property; limits of sequences; normality; Aronszajn tree; forcing; Mahlo cardinal; inaccessible cardinal},
language = {eng},
number = {3},
pages = {205-231},
title = {On families of Lindelöf and related subspaces of $2^\{ω₁\}$},
url = {http://eudml.org/doc/281938},
volume = {169},
year = {2001},
}

TY - JOUR
AU - Lúcia Junqueira
AU - Piotr Koszmider
TI - On families of Lindelöf and related subspaces of $2^{ω₁}$
JO - Fundamenta Mathematicae
PY - 2001
VL - 169
IS - 3
SP - 205
EP - 231
AB - We consider the families of all subspaces of size ω₁ of $2^{ω₁}$ (or of a compact zero-dimensional space X of weight ω₁ in general) which are normal, have the Lindelöf property or are closed under limits of convergent ω₁-sequences. Various relations among these families modulo the club filter in $[X]^{ω₁}$ are shown to be consistently possible. One of the main tools is dealing with a subspace of the form X ∩ M for an elementary submodel M of size ω₁. Various results with this flavor are obtained. Another tool used is forcing and in this case various preservation or nonpreservation results of topological and combinatorial properties are proved. In particular we prove that there may be no c.c.c. forcing which destroys the Lindelöf property of compact spaces, answering a question of Juhász. Many related questions are formulated.
LA - eng
KW - Lindelöf property; limits of sequences; normality; Aronszajn tree; forcing; Mahlo cardinal; inaccessible cardinal
UR - http://eudml.org/doc/281938
ER -

NotesEmbed ?

top

You must be logged in to post comments.

To embed these notes on your page include the following JavaScript code on your page where you want the notes to appear.

Only the controls for the widget will be shown in your chosen language. Notes will be shown in their authored language.

Tells the widget how many notes to show per page. You can cycle through additional notes using the next and previous controls.

    
                

Note: Best practice suggests putting the JavaScript code just before the closing </body> tag.