Differentiation and splitting for lattices over orders

Wolfgang Rump

Colloquium Mathematicae (2001)

  • Volume: 89, Issue: 1, page 7-42
  • ISSN: 0010-1354

Abstract

top
We extend our module-theoretic approach to Zavadskiĭ’s differentiation techniques in representation theory. Let R be a complete discrete valuation domain with quotient field K, and Λ an R-order in a finite-dimensional K-algebra. For a hereditary monomorphism u: P ↪ I of Λ-lattices we have an equivalence of quotient categories ̃ u : Λ - l a t / [ ] δ u Λ - l a t / [ B ] which generalizes Zavadskiĭ’s algorithms for posets and tiled orders, and Simson’s reduction algorithm for vector space categories. In this article we replace u by a more general type of monomorphism, and the derived order δ u Λ by some over-order u Λ δ u Λ . Then ̃ u remains an equivalence if δ u Λ - l a t is replaced by a certain subcategory of u Λ - l a t . The extended differentiation comprises a splitting theorem that implies Simson’s splitting theorem for vector space categories.

How to cite

top

Wolfgang Rump. "Differentiation and splitting for lattices over orders." Colloquium Mathematicae 89.1 (2001): 7-42. <http://eudml.org/doc/283716>.

@article{WolfgangRump2001,
abstract = {We extend our module-theoretic approach to Zavadskiĭ’s differentiation techniques in representation theory. Let R be a complete discrete valuation domain with quotient field K, and Λ an R-order in a finite-dimensional K-algebra. For a hereditary monomorphism u: P ↪ I of Λ-lattices we have an equivalence of quotient categories $∂̃_\{u\}:Λ-lat/[ℋ ] ⭇ δ_\{u\}Λ-lat/[B]$ which generalizes Zavadskiĭ’s algorithms for posets and tiled orders, and Simson’s reduction algorithm for vector space categories. In this article we replace u by a more general type of monomorphism, and the derived order $δ_\{u\}Λ$ by some over-order $∂_\{u\}Λ ⊃ δ_\{u\}Λ$. Then $∂̃_\{u\}$ remains an equivalence if $δ_\{u\}Λ-lat$ is replaced by a certain subcategory of $∂_\{u\}Λ-lat$. The extended differentiation comprises a splitting theorem that implies Simson’s splitting theorem for vector space categories.},
author = {Wolfgang Rump},
journal = {Colloquium Mathematicae},
keywords = {orders; lattices; differentiation algorithms; splitting theorems; vector space categories},
language = {eng},
number = {1},
pages = {7-42},
title = {Differentiation and splitting for lattices over orders},
url = {http://eudml.org/doc/283716},
volume = {89},
year = {2001},
}

TY - JOUR
AU - Wolfgang Rump
TI - Differentiation and splitting for lattices over orders
JO - Colloquium Mathematicae
PY - 2001
VL - 89
IS - 1
SP - 7
EP - 42
AB - We extend our module-theoretic approach to Zavadskiĭ’s differentiation techniques in representation theory. Let R be a complete discrete valuation domain with quotient field K, and Λ an R-order in a finite-dimensional K-algebra. For a hereditary monomorphism u: P ↪ I of Λ-lattices we have an equivalence of quotient categories $∂̃_{u}:Λ-lat/[ℋ ] ⭇ δ_{u}Λ-lat/[B]$ which generalizes Zavadskiĭ’s algorithms for posets and tiled orders, and Simson’s reduction algorithm for vector space categories. In this article we replace u by a more general type of monomorphism, and the derived order $δ_{u}Λ$ by some over-order $∂_{u}Λ ⊃ δ_{u}Λ$. Then $∂̃_{u}$ remains an equivalence if $δ_{u}Λ-lat$ is replaced by a certain subcategory of $∂_{u}Λ-lat$. The extended differentiation comprises a splitting theorem that implies Simson’s splitting theorem for vector space categories.
LA - eng
KW - orders; lattices; differentiation algorithms; splitting theorems; vector space categories
UR - http://eudml.org/doc/283716
ER -

NotesEmbed ?

top

You must be logged in to post comments.

To embed these notes on your page include the following JavaScript code on your page where you want the notes to appear.

Only the controls for the widget will be shown in your chosen language. Notes will be shown in their authored language.

Tells the widget how many notes to show per page. You can cycle through additional notes using the next and previous controls.

    
                

Note: Best practice suggests putting the JavaScript code just before the closing </body> tag.