Product property for capacities in N

Mirosław Baran; Leokadia Bialas-Ciez

Annales Polonici Mathematici (2012)

  • Volume: 106, Issue: 1, page 19-29
  • ISSN: 0066-2216

Abstract

top
The paper deals with logarithmic capacities, an important tool in pluripotential theory. We show that a class of capacities, which contains the L-capacity, has the following product property: C ν ( E × E ) = m i n ( C ν ( E ) , C ν ( E ) ) , where E j and ν j are respectively a compact set and a norm in N j (j = 1,2), and ν is a norm in N + N , ν = ν₁⊕ₚ ν₂ with some 1 ≤ p ≤ ∞. For a convex subset E of N , denote by C(E) the standard L-capacity and by ω E the minimal width of E, that is, the minimal Euclidean distance between two supporting hyperplanes in 2 N . We prove that C ( E ) = ω E / 2 for a ball E in N , while C ( E ) = ω E / 4 if E is a convex symmetric body in N . This gives a generalization of known formulas in ℂ. Moreover, we show by an example that the last equality is not true for an arbitrary convex body.

How to cite

top

Mirosław Baran, and Leokadia Bialas-Ciez. "Product property for capacities in $ℂ^{N}$." Annales Polonici Mathematici 106.1 (2012): 19-29. <http://eudml.org/doc/286221>.

@article{MirosławBaran2012,
abstract = {The paper deals with logarithmic capacities, an important tool in pluripotential theory. We show that a class of capacities, which contains the L-capacity, has the following product property: $C_\{ν\}(E₁ × E₂) = min(C_\{ν₁\}(E₁),C_\{ν₂\}(E₂))$, where $E_\{j\}$ and $ν_\{j\}$ are respectively a compact set and a norm in $ℂ^\{N_\{j\}\}$ (j = 1,2), and ν is a norm in $ℂ^\{N₁+N₂\}$, ν = ν₁⊕ₚ ν₂ with some 1 ≤ p ≤ ∞. For a convex subset E of $ℂ^\{N\}$, denote by C(E) the standard L-capacity and by $ω_\{E\}$ the minimal width of E, that is, the minimal Euclidean distance between two supporting hyperplanes in $ℝ^\{2N\}$. We prove that $C(E) = ω_\{E\}/2$ for a ball E in $ℂ^\{N\}$, while $C(E) = ω_\{E\}/4$ if E is a convex symmetric body in $ℝ^\{N\}$. This gives a generalization of known formulas in ℂ. Moreover, we show by an example that the last equality is not true for an arbitrary convex body.},
author = {Mirosław Baran, Leokadia Bialas-Ciez},
journal = {Annales Polonici Mathematici},
keywords = {logarithmic capacity; Siciak's extremal function; convex set; convex symmetric body},
language = {eng},
number = {1},
pages = {19-29},
title = {Product property for capacities in $ℂ^\{N\}$},
url = {http://eudml.org/doc/286221},
volume = {106},
year = {2012},
}

TY - JOUR
AU - Mirosław Baran
AU - Leokadia Bialas-Ciez
TI - Product property for capacities in $ℂ^{N}$
JO - Annales Polonici Mathematici
PY - 2012
VL - 106
IS - 1
SP - 19
EP - 29
AB - The paper deals with logarithmic capacities, an important tool in pluripotential theory. We show that a class of capacities, which contains the L-capacity, has the following product property: $C_{ν}(E₁ × E₂) = min(C_{ν₁}(E₁),C_{ν₂}(E₂))$, where $E_{j}$ and $ν_{j}$ are respectively a compact set and a norm in $ℂ^{N_{j}}$ (j = 1,2), and ν is a norm in $ℂ^{N₁+N₂}$, ν = ν₁⊕ₚ ν₂ with some 1 ≤ p ≤ ∞. For a convex subset E of $ℂ^{N}$, denote by C(E) the standard L-capacity and by $ω_{E}$ the minimal width of E, that is, the minimal Euclidean distance between two supporting hyperplanes in $ℝ^{2N}$. We prove that $C(E) = ω_{E}/2$ for a ball E in $ℂ^{N}$, while $C(E) = ω_{E}/4$ if E is a convex symmetric body in $ℝ^{N}$. This gives a generalization of known formulas in ℂ. Moreover, we show by an example that the last equality is not true for an arbitrary convex body.
LA - eng
KW - logarithmic capacity; Siciak's extremal function; convex set; convex symmetric body
UR - http://eudml.org/doc/286221
ER -

NotesEmbed ?

top

You must be logged in to post comments.

To embed these notes on your page include the following JavaScript code on your page where you want the notes to appear.

Only the controls for the widget will be shown in your chosen language. Notes will be shown in their authored language.

Tells the widget how many notes to show per page. You can cycle through additional notes using the next and previous controls.

    
                

Note: Best practice suggests putting the JavaScript code just before the closing </body> tag.