(Non-)amenability of ℬ(E)

Volker Runde

Banach Center Publications (2010)

  • Volume: 91, Issue: 1, page 339-351
  • ISSN: 0137-6934

Abstract

top
In 1972, the late B. E. Johnson introduced the notion of an amenable Banach algebra and asked whether the Banach algebra ℬ(E) of all bounded linear operators on a Banach space E could ever be amenable if dim E = ∞. Somewhat surprisingly, this question was answered positively only very recently as a by-product of the Argyros-Haydon result that solves the “scalar plus compact problem”: there is an infinite-dimensional Banach space E, the dual of which is ℓ¹, such that ( E ) = ( E ) + i d E . Still, ℬ(ℓ²) is not amenable, and in the past decade, ( p ) was found to be non-amenable for p = 1,2,∞ thanks to the work of C. J. Read, G. Pisier, and N. Ozawa. We survey those results, and then-based on joint work with M. Daws-outline a proof that establishes the non-amenability of ( p ) for all p ∈ [1,∞].

How to cite

top

Volker Runde. "(Non-)amenability of ℬ(E)." Banach Center Publications 91.1 (2010): 339-351. <http://eudml.org/doc/286427>.

@article{VolkerRunde2010,
abstract = {In 1972, the late B. E. Johnson introduced the notion of an amenable Banach algebra and asked whether the Banach algebra ℬ(E) of all bounded linear operators on a Banach space E could ever be amenable if dim E = ∞. Somewhat surprisingly, this question was answered positively only very recently as a by-product of the Argyros-Haydon result that solves the “scalar plus compact problem”: there is an infinite-dimensional Banach space E, the dual of which is ℓ¹, such that $ℬ(E) = (E) + ℂid_\{E\}$. Still, ℬ(ℓ²) is not amenable, and in the past decade, $ℬ(ℓ^\{p\})$ was found to be non-amenable for p = 1,2,∞ thanks to the work of C. J. Read, G. Pisier, and N. Ozawa. We survey those results, and then-based on joint work with M. Daws-outline a proof that establishes the non-amenability of $ℬ(ℓ^\{p\})$ for all p ∈ [1,∞].},
author = {Volker Runde},
journal = {Banach Center Publications},
keywords = {amenable Banach algebras; -spaces},
language = {eng},
number = {1},
pages = {339-351},
title = {(Non-)amenability of ℬ(E)},
url = {http://eudml.org/doc/286427},
volume = {91},
year = {2010},
}

TY - JOUR
AU - Volker Runde
TI - (Non-)amenability of ℬ(E)
JO - Banach Center Publications
PY - 2010
VL - 91
IS - 1
SP - 339
EP - 351
AB - In 1972, the late B. E. Johnson introduced the notion of an amenable Banach algebra and asked whether the Banach algebra ℬ(E) of all bounded linear operators on a Banach space E could ever be amenable if dim E = ∞. Somewhat surprisingly, this question was answered positively only very recently as a by-product of the Argyros-Haydon result that solves the “scalar plus compact problem”: there is an infinite-dimensional Banach space E, the dual of which is ℓ¹, such that $ℬ(E) = (E) + ℂid_{E}$. Still, ℬ(ℓ²) is not amenable, and in the past decade, $ℬ(ℓ^{p})$ was found to be non-amenable for p = 1,2,∞ thanks to the work of C. J. Read, G. Pisier, and N. Ozawa. We survey those results, and then-based on joint work with M. Daws-outline a proof that establishes the non-amenability of $ℬ(ℓ^{p})$ for all p ∈ [1,∞].
LA - eng
KW - amenable Banach algebras; -spaces
UR - http://eudml.org/doc/286427
ER -

NotesEmbed ?

top

You must be logged in to post comments.