Supercompactness and failures of GCH

Sy-David Friedman; Radek Honzik

Fundamenta Mathematicae (2012)

  • Volume: 219, Issue: 1, page 15-36
  • ISSN: 0016-2736

Abstract

top
Let κ < λ be regular cardinals. We say that an embedding j: V → M with critical point κ is λ-tall if λ < j(κ) and M is closed under κ-sequences in V. Silver showed that GCH can fail at a measurable cardinal κ, starting with κ being κ⁺⁺-supercompact. Later, Woodin improved this result, starting from the optimal hypothesis of a κ⁺⁺-tall measurable cardinal κ. Now more generally, suppose that κ ≤ λ are regular and one wishes the GCH to fail at λ with κ being λ-supercompact. Silver’s methods show that this can be done starting with κ being λ⁺⁺-supercompact (note that Silver’s result above is the special case when κ = λ). One can ask if there is an analogue of Woodin’s result for λ-supercompactness. We answer this question in the following strong sense: starting with the GCH and κ being λ-supercompact and λ⁺⁺-tall, we preserve λ-supercompactness of κ and kill the GCH at λ by directly manipulating the size of 2 λ (i.e. we do not force the failure of GCH at λ as a consequence of having 2 κ large enough). The direct manipulation of 2 λ , where λ can be a successor cardinal, is the first step toward understanding which Easton functions can be realized as the continuum function on regular cardinals while preserving instances of λ-supercompactness.

How to cite

top

Sy-David Friedman, and Radek Honzik. "Supercompactness and failures of GCH." Fundamenta Mathematicae 219.1 (2012): 15-36. <http://eudml.org/doc/286462>.

@article{Sy2012,
abstract = {Let κ < λ be regular cardinals. We say that an embedding j: V → M with critical point κ is λ-tall if λ < j(κ) and M is closed under κ-sequences in V. Silver showed that GCH can fail at a measurable cardinal κ, starting with κ being κ⁺⁺-supercompact. Later, Woodin improved this result, starting from the optimal hypothesis of a κ⁺⁺-tall measurable cardinal κ. Now more generally, suppose that κ ≤ λ are regular and one wishes the GCH to fail at λ with κ being λ-supercompact. Silver’s methods show that this can be done starting with κ being λ⁺⁺-supercompact (note that Silver’s result above is the special case when κ = λ). One can ask if there is an analogue of Woodin’s result for λ-supercompactness. We answer this question in the following strong sense: starting with the GCH and κ being λ-supercompact and λ⁺⁺-tall, we preserve λ-supercompactness of κ and kill the GCH at λ by directly manipulating the size of $2^\{λ\}$ (i.e. we do not force the failure of GCH at λ as a consequence of having $2^\{κ\}$ large enough). The direct manipulation of $2^\{λ\}$, where λ can be a successor cardinal, is the first step toward understanding which Easton functions can be realized as the continuum function on regular cardinals while preserving instances of λ-supercompactness.},
author = {Sy-David Friedman, Radek Honzik},
journal = {Fundamenta Mathematicae},
keywords = {lifting of embeddings; supercompact cardinals; Sacks forcing},
language = {eng},
number = {1},
pages = {15-36},
title = {Supercompactness and failures of GCH},
url = {http://eudml.org/doc/286462},
volume = {219},
year = {2012},
}

TY - JOUR
AU - Sy-David Friedman
AU - Radek Honzik
TI - Supercompactness and failures of GCH
JO - Fundamenta Mathematicae
PY - 2012
VL - 219
IS - 1
SP - 15
EP - 36
AB - Let κ < λ be regular cardinals. We say that an embedding j: V → M with critical point κ is λ-tall if λ < j(κ) and M is closed under κ-sequences in V. Silver showed that GCH can fail at a measurable cardinal κ, starting with κ being κ⁺⁺-supercompact. Later, Woodin improved this result, starting from the optimal hypothesis of a κ⁺⁺-tall measurable cardinal κ. Now more generally, suppose that κ ≤ λ are regular and one wishes the GCH to fail at λ with κ being λ-supercompact. Silver’s methods show that this can be done starting with κ being λ⁺⁺-supercompact (note that Silver’s result above is the special case when κ = λ). One can ask if there is an analogue of Woodin’s result for λ-supercompactness. We answer this question in the following strong sense: starting with the GCH and κ being λ-supercompact and λ⁺⁺-tall, we preserve λ-supercompactness of κ and kill the GCH at λ by directly manipulating the size of $2^{λ}$ (i.e. we do not force the failure of GCH at λ as a consequence of having $2^{κ}$ large enough). The direct manipulation of $2^{λ}$, where λ can be a successor cardinal, is the first step toward understanding which Easton functions can be realized as the continuum function on regular cardinals while preserving instances of λ-supercompactness.
LA - eng
KW - lifting of embeddings; supercompact cardinals; Sacks forcing
UR - http://eudml.org/doc/286462
ER -

NotesEmbed ?

top

You must be logged in to post comments.

To embed these notes on your page include the following JavaScript code on your page where you want the notes to appear.

Only the controls for the widget will be shown in your chosen language. Notes will be shown in their authored language.

Tells the widget how many notes to show per page. You can cycle through additional notes using the next and previous controls.

    
                

Note: Best practice suggests putting the JavaScript code just before the closing </body> tag.