On suitable inlet boundary conditions for fluid-structure interaction problems in a channel

Jan Valášek; Petr Sváček; Jaromír Horáček

Applications of Mathematics (2019)

  • Volume: 64, Issue: 2, page 225-251
  • ISSN: 0862-7940

Abstract

top
We are interested in the numerical solution of a two-dimensional fluid-structure interaction problem. A special attention is paid to the choice of physically relevant inlet boundary conditions for the case of channel closing. Three types of the inlet boundary conditions are considered. Beside the classical Dirichlet and the do-nothing boundary conditions also a generalized boundary condition motivated by the penalization prescription of the Dirichlet boundary condition is applied. The fluid flow is described by the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations in the arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian (ALE) form and the elastic body creating a part of the channel wall is modelled with the aid of linear elasticity. Both models are coupled with the boundary conditions prescribed at the common interface. The elastic and the fluid flow problems are approximated by the finite element method. The detailed derivation of the weak formulation including the boundary conditions is presented. The pseudo-elastic approach for construction of the ALE mapping is used. Results of numerical simulations for three considered inlet boundary conditions are compared. The flutter velocity is determined for a specific model problem and it is shown that the boundary condition with the penalization approach is suitable for the case of the fluid flow in a channel with vibrating walls.

How to cite

top

Valášek, Jan, Sváček, Petr, and Horáček, Jaromír. "On suitable inlet boundary conditions for fluid-structure interaction problems in a channel." Applications of Mathematics 64.2 (2019): 225-251. <http://eudml.org/doc/294165>.

@article{Valášek2019,
abstract = {We are interested in the numerical solution of a two-dimensional fluid-structure interaction problem. A special attention is paid to the choice of physically relevant inlet boundary conditions for the case of channel closing. Three types of the inlet boundary conditions are considered. Beside the classical Dirichlet and the do-nothing boundary conditions also a generalized boundary condition motivated by the penalization prescription of the Dirichlet boundary condition is applied. The fluid flow is described by the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations in the arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian (ALE) form and the elastic body creating a part of the channel wall is modelled with the aid of linear elasticity. Both models are coupled with the boundary conditions prescribed at the common interface. The elastic and the fluid flow problems are approximated by the finite element method. The detailed derivation of the weak formulation including the boundary conditions is presented. The pseudo-elastic approach for construction of the ALE mapping is used. Results of numerical simulations for three considered inlet boundary conditions are compared. The flutter velocity is determined for a specific model problem and it is shown that the boundary condition with the penalization approach is suitable for the case of the fluid flow in a channel with vibrating walls.},
author = {Valášek, Jan, Sváček, Petr, Horáček, Jaromír},
journal = {Applications of Mathematics},
keywords = {flow-induced vibration; 2D incompressible Navier-Stokes equations; linear elasticity; inlet boundary conditions; flutter instability},
language = {eng},
number = {2},
pages = {225-251},
publisher = {Institute of Mathematics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic},
title = {On suitable inlet boundary conditions for fluid-structure interaction problems in a channel},
url = {http://eudml.org/doc/294165},
volume = {64},
year = {2019},
}

TY - JOUR
AU - Valášek, Jan
AU - Sváček, Petr
AU - Horáček, Jaromír
TI - On suitable inlet boundary conditions for fluid-structure interaction problems in a channel
JO - Applications of Mathematics
PY - 2019
PB - Institute of Mathematics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic
VL - 64
IS - 2
SP - 225
EP - 251
AB - We are interested in the numerical solution of a two-dimensional fluid-structure interaction problem. A special attention is paid to the choice of physically relevant inlet boundary conditions for the case of channel closing. Three types of the inlet boundary conditions are considered. Beside the classical Dirichlet and the do-nothing boundary conditions also a generalized boundary condition motivated by the penalization prescription of the Dirichlet boundary condition is applied. The fluid flow is described by the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations in the arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian (ALE) form and the elastic body creating a part of the channel wall is modelled with the aid of linear elasticity. Both models are coupled with the boundary conditions prescribed at the common interface. The elastic and the fluid flow problems are approximated by the finite element method. The detailed derivation of the weak formulation including the boundary conditions is presented. The pseudo-elastic approach for construction of the ALE mapping is used. Results of numerical simulations for three considered inlet boundary conditions are compared. The flutter velocity is determined for a specific model problem and it is shown that the boundary condition with the penalization approach is suitable for the case of the fluid flow in a channel with vibrating walls.
LA - eng
KW - flow-induced vibration; 2D incompressible Navier-Stokes equations; linear elasticity; inlet boundary conditions; flutter instability
UR - http://eudml.org/doc/294165
ER -

References

top
  1. Babuška, I., 10.2307/2005611, Math. Comput. 27 (1973), 221-228. (1973) Zbl0299.65057MR0351118DOI10.2307/2005611
  2. Bodnár, T., Galdi, G. P., Nečasová, Š., (eds.), 10.1007/978-3-0348-0822-4, Advances in Mathematical Fluid Mechanics, Birkhäuser/Springer, Basel (2014). (2014) Zbl1300.76003MR3223031DOI10.1007/978-3-0348-0822-4
  3. Braack, M., Mucha, P. B., 10.4208/jcm.1405-4347, J. Comput. Math. 32 (2014), 507-521. (2014) Zbl1324.76015MR3258025DOI10.4208/jcm.1405-4347
  4. Curnier, A., 10.1007/978-94-011-1112-6, Solid Mechanics and Its Applications 29 Kluwer Academic Publishers Group, Dordrecht (1994). (1994) Zbl0815.73003MR1311022DOI10.1007/978-94-011-1112-6
  5. Daily, D. J., Thomson, S. L., 10.1016/j.compstruc.2012.10.022, Comput. Struct. 116 (2013), 50-58. (2013) DOI10.1016/j.compstruc.2012.10.022
  6. Davis, T. A., 10.1137/1.9780898718881, Fundamentals of Algorithms 2, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), Philadelphia (2006). (2006) Zbl1119.65021MR2270673DOI10.1137/1.9780898718881
  7. Diez, N. G., Belfroid, S., Golliard, J., (eds.), Flow-Induced Vibration & Noise. Proceedings of 11th International Conference on Flow Induced Vibration & Noise, TNO, Delft, The Hague, The Netherlands (2016). (2016) 
  8. Dowell, E. H., 10.1007/978-3-319-09453-3, Solid Mechanics and Its Applications 217, Springer, Cham (2004). (2004) Zbl1297.74001MR3306893DOI10.1007/978-3-319-09453-3
  9. Feistauer, M., Hasnedlová-Prokopová, J., Horáček, J., Kosík, A., Kučera, V., 10.1016/j.cam.2013.03.028, J. Comput. Appl. Math. 254 (2013), 17-30. (2013) Zbl1290.65089MR3061063DOI10.1016/j.cam.2013.03.028
  10. Feistauer, M., Sváček, P., Horáček, J., 10.1007/978-3-0348-0822-4_5, Fluid-Structure Interaction and Biomedical Applications T. Bodnár et al. Advances in Mathematical Fluid Mechanics, Birkhäuser/Springer, Basel (2014), 321-393. (2014) Zbl06482614MR3329021DOI10.1007/978-3-0348-0822-4_5
  11. Formaggia, L., Parolini, N., Pischedda, M., Riccobene, C., 10.15304/cc.2016.968, 19th European Conference on Mathematics for Industry 6 pages (2016). (2016) DOI10.15304/cc.2016.968
  12. Gelhard, T., Lube, G., Olshanskii, M. A., Starcke, J.-H., 10.1016/j.cam.2004.09.017, J. Comput. Appl. Math. 177 (2005), 243-267. (2005) Zbl1063.76054MR2125317DOI10.1016/j.cam.2004.09.017
  13. Girault, V., Raviart, P.-A., Finite Element Methods for Navier-Stokes Equations. Theory and Algorithms, Springer Series in Computational Mathematics 5, Springer, Cham (1986),9999DOI99999 10.1007/978-3-642-61623-5 . (1986) Zbl0585.65077MR0851383
  14. Horáček, J., Radolf, V. V., Bula, V., Košina, J., Experimental modelling of phonation using artificial models of human vocal folds and vocal tracts, V. Fuis Engineering Mechanics 2017 Brno University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering (2017), 382-385. (2017) 
  15. Horáček, J., Šidlof, P., Švec, J. G., 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2005.05.003, J. Fluids Struct. 20 (2005), 853-869. (2005) DOI10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2005.05.003
  16. Horáček, J., Švec, J. G., 10.1006/jfls.2002.0454, J. Fluids Struct. 16 (2002), 931-955. (2002) DOI10.1006/jfls.2002.0454
  17. Horáček, J., Švec, J. G., 10.1115/imece2002-32199, ASME 2002 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition American Society of Mechanical Engineers (2002), 1043-1054. (2002) DOI10.1115/imece2002-32199
  18. Johnson, C., Numerical Solution of Partial Differential Equations by the Finite Element Method, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1987). (1987) Zbl0628.65098MR0925005
  19. Kaltenbacher, M., Zörner, S., Hüppe, A., 10.1504/PCFD.2014.059195, Prog. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 14 (2014), 2-13. (2014) Zbl1400.76041DOI10.1504/PCFD.2014.059195
  20. Link, G., Kaltenbacher, M., Breuer, M., Döllinger, M., 10.1016/j.cma.2009.06.009, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 198 (2009), 3321-3334. (2009) Zbl1230.74188MR2571347DOI10.1016/j.cma.2009.06.009
  21. Sadeghi, H., Kniesburges, S., Kaltenbacher, M., Schützenberger, A., Döllinger, M., 10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.01.001, Journal of Voice (2018). (2018) DOI10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.01.001
  22. Seo, J. H., Mittal, R., 10.1016/j.jcp.2010.10.017, J. Comput. Phys. 230 (2011), 1000-1019. (2011) Zbl1391.76698MR2753346DOI10.1016/j.jcp.2010.10.017
  23. Šidlof, P., Kolář, J., Peukert, P., 10.14311/tpfm.2018.034, D. Šimurda, T. Bodnár Topical Problems of Fluid Mechanics 2018 Institute of Thermomechanics, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Praha (2018), 251-256. (2018) DOI10.14311/tpfm.2018.034
  24. Slaughter, W. S., 10.1007/978-1-4612-0093-2, Birkhäuser, Boston (2002). (2002) Zbl0999.74002MR1902598DOI10.1007/978-1-4612-0093-2
  25. Sváček, P., Horáček, J., 10.4208/cicp.011010.280611s, Commun. Comput. Phys. 12 (2012), 789-806. (2012) DOI10.4208/cicp.011010.280611s
  26. Sváček, P., Horáček, J., 10.1016/j.amc.2017.02.026, Appl. Math. Comput. 319 (2018), 178-194. (2018) MR3717682DOI10.1016/j.amc.2017.02.026
  27. Takashi, N., Hughes, T. J. R., 10.1016/0045-7825(92)90085-X, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 95 (1992), 115-138. (1992) Zbl0756.76047DOI10.1016/0045-7825(92)90085-X
  28. Valášek, J., Kaltenbacher, M., Sváček, P., 10.1007/s10494-018-9900-z, Flow, Turbul. Combust. (2018), 1-15. (2018) DOI10.1007/s10494-018-9900-z
  29. Valášek, J., Sváček, P., Horáček, J., 10.1051/epjconf/201611402130, EPJ Web of Conferences 114 (2016), Article No. 02130, 6 pages. (2016) DOI10.1051/epjconf/201611402130
  30. Valášek, J., Sváček, P., Horáček, J., 10.21136/panm.2016.17, Programs and Algorithms of Numerical Mathematics 18. Proceedings of the 18th Seminar (PANM), 2016 Institute of Mathematics, Czech Academy of Sciences, Praha (2017), 144-153. (2017) Zbl06994472MR3791877DOI10.21136/panm.2016.17
  31. Venkatramani, J., Nair, V., Sujith, R. I., Gupta, S., Sarkar, S., 10.1016/j.jsv.2016.10.004, J. Sound Vib. 386 (2017), 390-406. (2017) DOI10.1016/j.jsv.2016.10.004
  32. Zorner, S., Numerical Simulation Method for a Precise Calculation of the Human Phonation Under Realistic Conditions, Ph.D. Thesis, Technische Uuniversität Wien (2013). (2013) 

NotesEmbed ?

top

You must be logged in to post comments.

To embed these notes on your page include the following JavaScript code on your page where you want the notes to appear.

Only the controls for the widget will be shown in your chosen language. Notes will be shown in their authored language.

Tells the widget how many notes to show per page. You can cycle through additional notes using the next and previous controls.

    
                

Note: Best practice suggests putting the JavaScript code just before the closing </body> tag.