Logics with Impossibility as the Negation and Regular Extensions of the Deontic Logic D2

Krystyna Mruczek-Nasieniewska; Marek Nasieniewski

Bulletin of the Section of Logic (2017)

  • Volume: 46, Issue: 3/4
  • ISSN: 0138-0680

Abstract

top
In [1] J.-Y. Bèziau formulated a logic called Z. Bèziau’s idea was generalized independently in [6] and [7]. A family of logics to which Z belongs is denoted in [7] by K. In particular; it has been shown in [6] and [7] that there is a correspondence between normal modal logics and logics from the class K. Similar; but only partial results has been obtained also for regular logics (see [8] and [9]). In (Došen; [2]) a logic N has been investigated in the language with negation; implication; conjunction and disjunction by axioms of positive intuitionistic logic; the right-to-left part of the second de Morgan law; and the rules of modus ponens and contraposition. From the semantical point of view the negation used by Došen is the modal operator of impossibility. It is known this operator is a characteristic of the modal interpretation of intuitionistic negation (see [3; p. 300]). In the present paper we consider an extension of N denoted by N+. We will prove that every extension of N+ that is closed under the same rules as N+; corresponds to a regular logic being an extension of the regular deontic logic D21 (see [4] and [13]). The proved correspondence allows to obtain from soundnesscompleteness result for any given regular logic containing D2, similar adequacy theorem for the respective extension of the logic N+.

How to cite

top

Krystyna Mruczek-Nasieniewska, and Marek Nasieniewski. "Logics with Impossibility as the Negation and Regular Extensions of the Deontic Logic D2." Bulletin of the Section of Logic 46.3/4 (2017): null. <http://eudml.org/doc/295598>.

@article{KrystynaMruczek2017,
abstract = {In [1] J.-Y. Bèziau formulated a logic called Z. Bèziau’s idea was generalized independently in [6] and [7]. A family of logics to which Z belongs is denoted in [7] by K. In particular; it has been shown in [6] and [7] that there is a correspondence between normal modal logics and logics from the class K. Similar; but only partial results has been obtained also for regular logics (see [8] and [9]). In (Došen; [2]) a logic N has been investigated in the language with negation; implication; conjunction and disjunction by axioms of positive intuitionistic logic; the right-to-left part of the second de Morgan law; and the rules of modus ponens and contraposition. From the semantical point of view the negation used by Došen is the modal operator of impossibility. It is known this operator is a characteristic of the modal interpretation of intuitionistic negation (see [3; p. 300]). In the present paper we consider an extension of N denoted by N+. We will prove that every extension of N+ that is closed under the same rules as N+; corresponds to a regular logic being an extension of the regular deontic logic D21 (see [4] and [13]). The proved correspondence allows to obtain from soundnesscompleteness result for any given regular logic containing D2, similar adequacy theorem for the respective extension of the logic N+.},
author = {Krystyna Mruczek-Nasieniewska, Marek Nasieniewski},
journal = {Bulletin of the Section of Logic},
keywords = {non-classical negation; modalized negation; impossibility; correspondence; regular modal logics; the smallest regular deontic logic D2},
language = {eng},
number = {3/4},
pages = {null},
title = {Logics with Impossibility as the Negation and Regular Extensions of the Deontic Logic D2},
url = {http://eudml.org/doc/295598},
volume = {46},
year = {2017},
}

TY - JOUR
AU - Krystyna Mruczek-Nasieniewska
AU - Marek Nasieniewski
TI - Logics with Impossibility as the Negation and Regular Extensions of the Deontic Logic D2
JO - Bulletin of the Section of Logic
PY - 2017
VL - 46
IS - 3/4
SP - null
AB - In [1] J.-Y. Bèziau formulated a logic called Z. Bèziau’s idea was generalized independently in [6] and [7]. A family of logics to which Z belongs is denoted in [7] by K. In particular; it has been shown in [6] and [7] that there is a correspondence between normal modal logics and logics from the class K. Similar; but only partial results has been obtained also for regular logics (see [8] and [9]). In (Došen; [2]) a logic N has been investigated in the language with negation; implication; conjunction and disjunction by axioms of positive intuitionistic logic; the right-to-left part of the second de Morgan law; and the rules of modus ponens and contraposition. From the semantical point of view the negation used by Došen is the modal operator of impossibility. It is known this operator is a characteristic of the modal interpretation of intuitionistic negation (see [3; p. 300]). In the present paper we consider an extension of N denoted by N+. We will prove that every extension of N+ that is closed under the same rules as N+; corresponds to a regular logic being an extension of the regular deontic logic D21 (see [4] and [13]). The proved correspondence allows to obtain from soundnesscompleteness result for any given regular logic containing D2, similar adequacy theorem for the respective extension of the logic N+.
LA - eng
KW - non-classical negation; modalized negation; impossibility; correspondence; regular modal logics; the smallest regular deontic logic D2
UR - http://eudml.org/doc/295598
ER -

References

top
  1. [1] J.-Y. Béziau, The paraconsistent logic Z, Logic and Logical Philosophy 15 (2006), pp. 99–111. 
  2. [2] K. Došen, Negation in the light of modal logic, in: Dov M. Gabbay and Heinrich Wansing, What is Negation?, Dordrecht, Kluwer, 1999, pp. 77–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9309-0 
  3. [3] K. Gödel, An interpretation of the intuitionistic propositional calculus, 1933, [in:] S. Feferman, Collected Works vol I, Publications 1929–1936, Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press, New York, Oxford 1986, pp. 300–303. 
  4. [4] E. J. Lemmon, New foundations for Lewis modal systems, The Journal of Symbolic Logic 22 (2) (1957), pp. 176–186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2964179 
  5. [5] E. J. Lemmon, Algebraic semantics for modal logics I, The Journal of Symbolic Logic 31 (1) (1966), pp. 46–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2270619 
  6. [6] J. Marcos, Nearly every normal modal logic is paranormal, Logique et Analyse 48 (189–192) (2005), pp. 279–300. 
  7. [7] K. Mruczek-Nasieniewska and M. Nasieniewski, Syntactical and semantical characterization of a class of paraconsistent logics, Bulletin of the Section of Logic 34 (4) (2005), pp. 229–248. 
  8. [8] K. Mruczek-Nasieniewska and M. Nasieniewski, Paraconsitent logics obtained by J.-Y. Béziau’s method by means of some non-normal modal logics, Bulletin of the Section of Logic 37 (3/4) (2008), pp. 185–196. 
  9. [9] K. Mruczek-Nasieniewska and M. Nasieniewski, A Segerberg-like connection between certain classes of propositional logics, Bulletin of the Section of Logic 42 (1/2) (2013), pp. 43–52. 
  10. [10] K. Mruczek-Nasieniewska and M. Nasieniewski, A Characterisation of Some Z-Like Logics, Logica Universalis, 13 pp. Online: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11787-018-0184-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11787-018-0184-9 
  11. [11] A. Palmigiano, S. Sourabh and Z. Zhao, Sahlqvist theory for impossible worlds, Journal of Logic and Computation 27 (3) (2017), pp. 775–816, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/exw014 
  12. [12] D. W. Ripley, Negation in Natural Language, PhD Dissertation, University of North Carolina, 2009. 
  13. [13] K. Segerberg, An Essay in Classical Modal Logic, vol. I and vol. II, Uppsala 1971. 

NotesEmbed ?

top

You must be logged in to post comments.

To embed these notes on your page include the following JavaScript code on your page where you want the notes to appear.

Only the controls for the widget will be shown in your chosen language. Notes will be shown in their authored language.

Tells the widget how many notes to show per page. You can cycle through additional notes using the next and previous controls.

    
                

Note: Best practice suggests putting the JavaScript code just before the closing </body> tag.