Logics with Impossibility as the Negation and Regular Extensions of the Deontic Logic D2
Krystyna Mruczek-Nasieniewska; Marek Nasieniewski
Bulletin of the Section of Logic (2017)
- Volume: 46, Issue: 3/4
- ISSN: 0138-0680
Access Full Article
topAbstract
topHow to cite
topKrystyna Mruczek-Nasieniewska, and Marek Nasieniewski. "Logics with Impossibility as the Negation and Regular Extensions of the Deontic Logic D2." Bulletin of the Section of Logic 46.3/4 (2017): null. <http://eudml.org/doc/295598>.
@article{KrystynaMruczek2017,
abstract = {In [1] J.-Y. Bèziau formulated a logic called Z. Bèziau’s idea was generalized independently in [6] and [7]. A family of logics to which Z belongs is denoted in [7] by K. In particular; it has been shown in [6] and [7] that there is a correspondence between normal modal logics and logics from the class K. Similar; but only partial results has been obtained also for regular logics (see [8] and [9]). In (Došen; [2]) a logic N has been investigated in the language with negation; implication; conjunction and disjunction by axioms of positive intuitionistic logic; the right-to-left part of the second de Morgan law; and the rules of modus ponens and contraposition. From the semantical point of view the negation used by Došen is the modal operator of impossibility. It is known this operator is a characteristic of the modal interpretation of intuitionistic negation (see [3; p. 300]). In the present paper we consider an extension of N denoted by N+. We will prove that every extension of N+ that is closed under the same rules as N+; corresponds to a regular logic being an extension of the regular deontic logic D21 (see [4] and [13]). The proved correspondence allows to obtain from soundnesscompleteness result for any given regular logic containing D2, similar adequacy theorem for the respective extension of the logic N+.},
author = {Krystyna Mruczek-Nasieniewska, Marek Nasieniewski},
journal = {Bulletin of the Section of Logic},
keywords = {non-classical negation; modalized negation; impossibility; correspondence; regular modal logics; the smallest regular deontic logic D2},
language = {eng},
number = {3/4},
pages = {null},
title = {Logics with Impossibility as the Negation and Regular Extensions of the Deontic Logic D2},
url = {http://eudml.org/doc/295598},
volume = {46},
year = {2017},
}
TY - JOUR
AU - Krystyna Mruczek-Nasieniewska
AU - Marek Nasieniewski
TI - Logics with Impossibility as the Negation and Regular Extensions of the Deontic Logic D2
JO - Bulletin of the Section of Logic
PY - 2017
VL - 46
IS - 3/4
SP - null
AB - In [1] J.-Y. Bèziau formulated a logic called Z. Bèziau’s idea was generalized independently in [6] and [7]. A family of logics to which Z belongs is denoted in [7] by K. In particular; it has been shown in [6] and [7] that there is a correspondence between normal modal logics and logics from the class K. Similar; but only partial results has been obtained also for regular logics (see [8] and [9]). In (Došen; [2]) a logic N has been investigated in the language with negation; implication; conjunction and disjunction by axioms of positive intuitionistic logic; the right-to-left part of the second de Morgan law; and the rules of modus ponens and contraposition. From the semantical point of view the negation used by Došen is the modal operator of impossibility. It is known this operator is a characteristic of the modal interpretation of intuitionistic negation (see [3; p. 300]). In the present paper we consider an extension of N denoted by N+. We will prove that every extension of N+ that is closed under the same rules as N+; corresponds to a regular logic being an extension of the regular deontic logic D21 (see [4] and [13]). The proved correspondence allows to obtain from soundnesscompleteness result for any given regular logic containing D2, similar adequacy theorem for the respective extension of the logic N+.
LA - eng
KW - non-classical negation; modalized negation; impossibility; correspondence; regular modal logics; the smallest regular deontic logic D2
UR - http://eudml.org/doc/295598
ER -
References
top- [1] J.-Y. Béziau, The paraconsistent logic Z, Logic and Logical Philosophy 15 (2006), pp. 99–111.
- [2] K. Došen, Negation in the light of modal logic, in: Dov M. Gabbay and Heinrich Wansing, What is Negation?, Dordrecht, Kluwer, 1999, pp. 77–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9309-0
- [3] K. Gödel, An interpretation of the intuitionistic propositional calculus, 1933, [in:] S. Feferman, Collected Works vol I, Publications 1929–1936, Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press, New York, Oxford 1986, pp. 300–303.
- [4] E. J. Lemmon, New foundations for Lewis modal systems, The Journal of Symbolic Logic 22 (2) (1957), pp. 176–186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2964179
- [5] E. J. Lemmon, Algebraic semantics for modal logics I, The Journal of Symbolic Logic 31 (1) (1966), pp. 46–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2270619
- [6] J. Marcos, Nearly every normal modal logic is paranormal, Logique et Analyse 48 (189–192) (2005), pp. 279–300.
- [7] K. Mruczek-Nasieniewska and M. Nasieniewski, Syntactical and semantical characterization of a class of paraconsistent logics, Bulletin of the Section of Logic 34 (4) (2005), pp. 229–248.
- [8] K. Mruczek-Nasieniewska and M. Nasieniewski, Paraconsitent logics obtained by J.-Y. Béziau’s method by means of some non-normal modal logics, Bulletin of the Section of Logic 37 (3/4) (2008), pp. 185–196.
- [9] K. Mruczek-Nasieniewska and M. Nasieniewski, A Segerberg-like connection between certain classes of propositional logics, Bulletin of the Section of Logic 42 (1/2) (2013), pp. 43–52.
- [10] K. Mruczek-Nasieniewska and M. Nasieniewski, A Characterisation of Some Z-Like Logics, Logica Universalis, 13 pp. Online: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11787-018-0184-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11787-018-0184-9
- [11] A. Palmigiano, S. Sourabh and Z. Zhao, Sahlqvist theory for impossible worlds, Journal of Logic and Computation 27 (3) (2017), pp. 775–816, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/exw014
- [12] D. W. Ripley, Negation in Natural Language, PhD Dissertation, University of North Carolina, 2009.
- [13] K. Segerberg, An Essay in Classical Modal Logic, vol. I and vol. II, Uppsala 1971.
NotesEmbed ?
topTo embed these notes on your page include the following JavaScript code on your page where you want the notes to appear.