Full Cut Elimination and Interpolation for Intuitionistic Logic with Existence Predicate
Paolo Maffezioli; Eugenio Orlandelli
Bulletin of the Section of Logic (2019)
- Volume: 48, Issue: 2, page 137-158
- ISSN: 0138-0680
Access Full Article
topAbstract
topHow to cite
topPaolo Maffezioli, and Eugenio Orlandelli. "Full Cut Elimination and Interpolation for Intuitionistic Logic with Existence Predicate." Bulletin of the Section of Logic 48.2 (2019): 137-158. <http://eudml.org/doc/295600>.
@article{PaoloMaffezioli2019,
abstract = {In previous work by Baaz and Iemhoff, a Gentzen calculus for intuitionistic logic with existence predicate is presented that satisfies partial cut elimination and Craig's interpolation property; it is also conjectured that interpolation fails for the implication-free fragment. In this paper an equivalent calculus is introduced that satisfies full cut elimination and allows a direct proof of interpolation via Maehara's lemma. In this way, it is possible to obtain much simpler interpolants and to better understand and (partly) overcome the failure of interpolation for the implication-free fragment.},
author = {Paolo Maffezioli, Eugenio Orlandelli},
journal = {Bulletin of the Section of Logic},
keywords = {intuitionistic logic; existence predicate; sequent calculi; cut elimination; interpolation; Maehara's lemma},
language = {eng},
number = {2},
pages = {137-158},
title = {Full Cut Elimination and Interpolation for Intuitionistic Logic with Existence Predicate},
url = {http://eudml.org/doc/295600},
volume = {48},
year = {2019},
}
TY - JOUR
AU - Paolo Maffezioli
AU - Eugenio Orlandelli
TI - Full Cut Elimination and Interpolation for Intuitionistic Logic with Existence Predicate
JO - Bulletin of the Section of Logic
PY - 2019
VL - 48
IS - 2
SP - 137
EP - 158
AB - In previous work by Baaz and Iemhoff, a Gentzen calculus for intuitionistic logic with existence predicate is presented that satisfies partial cut elimination and Craig's interpolation property; it is also conjectured that interpolation fails for the implication-free fragment. In this paper an equivalent calculus is introduced that satisfies full cut elimination and allows a direct proof of interpolation via Maehara's lemma. In this way, it is possible to obtain much simpler interpolants and to better understand and (partly) overcome the failure of interpolation for the implication-free fragment.
LA - eng
KW - intuitionistic logic; existence predicate; sequent calculi; cut elimination; interpolation; Maehara's lemma
UR - http://eudml.org/doc/295600
ER -
References
top- [1] M. Baaz and R. Iemhoff. On interpolation in existence logics, Logic for Programming, Articial Intelligence, and Reasoning ed. by G. Sutcliffe and A. Voronkov, vol. 3835 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, 2005, pp. 697–711. https://doi.org/10.1007/11591191_48
- [2] M. Baaz and R. Iemhoff, Gentzen calculi for the existence predicate, Studia Logica, vol. 82, no. 1 (2006), pp. 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-006-6603-6
- [3] M. Beeson, Foundations of Constructive Mathematics. Springer, 1985. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-68952-9
- [4] G. Gherardi, P. Maffezioli, and E. Orlandelli, Interpolation in extensions of first-order logic, Studia Logica (2019), pp. 1–30. (published online). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-019-09867-0
- [5] S. Maehara, On the interpolation theorem of Craig. Suugaku, vol. 12 (1960), pp. 235–237. (in Japanese).
- [6] S. Negri, Contraction-free sequent calculi for geometric theories with an application to Barr's theorem, Archive for Mathematical Logic, vol. 42, no. 4 (2003), pp. 389–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001530100124
- [7] S. Negri, Proof analysis in modal logic, Journal of Philosophical Logic, vol. 34, no. (5-6) (2005), pp. 507–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-005-2267-3
- [8] S. Negri and J. von Plato, Structural Proof Theory. Cambridge University Press, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527340
- [9] D. Scott, Identity and existence in intuitionistic logic. In M. Fourman, C. Mulvey, and D. Scott, editors, Application of Shaves. Springer, 1979, pp. 660–696. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0061839
- [10] A.S. Troelstra and H. Schwichtenberg, Basic Proof Theory. Cambridge University Press, 2nd edition, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139168717
NotesEmbed ?
topTo embed these notes on your page include the following JavaScript code on your page where you want the notes to appear.