Environmental Education in school and society versus regional development

Wanda Wilczyńska-Michalik; Karolina Świder

Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis Studia Geographica (2010)

  • Volume: 1, page 103-125
  • ISSN: 2084-5456

Abstract

top
The article presents the concept of Ecological Footprint (EF), which is a quantitative indicator of human impact on the environment. The idea of EF has originated from the concept of carrying capacity. The Ecological Footprint measures how much of the land and water area a human population requires to produce the resource it consumes and to absorb its wastes, using the prevailing technology. The methodology was developed by Rees and Wackernagel (1996). The Ecological Footprint Assessment is a common supporting tool in planning and development of cities, subnational geographical regions and states. EF is important in ecological education at the primary and higher educational level, also including academic grade. At the beginning of the 21st century, requirements of the population in some countries (e.g. U.S., United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Denmark, Australia, Canada) already exceed the planetary limits and ecological assets are becoming more critical. Implementation of the EF concept demands precise definition of many terms taken from ecology, geography, technology, or economy. The most important terms are explained in the glossary. More than half the global population (on average about 51%) live in cities (in Poland about62%). Their inhabitants have a substantial impact on the environment. The EF value for inhabitants of the capital city of Poland – Warsaw – in 2005 was 6.5 gha per capita, for the inhabitants of Cracow – 7.67 gha per capita. The average EF worldwide value in 2005 was approximately 2,1 gha per capita, and in 2007 1.8 gha per capita. The inhabitants of Warsaw and Cracow, through consumption of goods and services, exert significant pressure on the environment and aggravate the ecological deficit of the Earth.

How to cite

top

Wanda Wilczyńska-Michalik, and Karolina Świder. "Założenia koncepcji Ekologicznego Śladu i przykłady obliczeń dla dużych miast." Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis Studia Geographica 1 (2010): 103-125. <http://eudml.org/doc/296490>.

@article{WandaWilczyńska2010,
author = {Wanda Wilczyńska-Michalik, Karolina Świder},
journal = {Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis Studia Geographica},
keywords = {ślad ekologiczny; Kraków; Warszawa},
language = {pol},
pages = {103-125},
title = {Założenia koncepcji Ekologicznego Śladu i przykłady obliczeń dla dużych miast},
url = {http://eudml.org/doc/296490},
volume = {1},
year = {2010},
}

TY - JOUR
AU - Wanda Wilczyńska-Michalik
AU - Karolina Świder
TI - Założenia koncepcji Ekologicznego Śladu i przykłady obliczeń dla dużych miast
JO - Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis Studia Geographica
PY - 2010
VL - 1
SP - 103
EP - 125
LA - pol
KW - ślad ekologiczny; Kraków; Warszawa
UR - http://eudml.org/doc/296490
ER -

References

top
  1. Aall C., Thorsen-Norland I., 2002, Report no. 11/02, The Ecological Footprint of the City of Oslo – Results and Proposals for the Use of the Ecological Footprint in Local Evironmental Policy, Western Norway Research Institute ProSus, Sogndal, University of Oslo, 1–38, 
  2. www.prosus.uio.no/english/sus_dev/tools/ecofootprint_oslo.htm 
  3. Barret J., Vallack H., Jones A., Haq G., 2002, A Material Flow Analysis and Ecological Footprint of York Technical Report, Stockholm Environment Institute, s. 1–109. 
  4. Barrett, J., Birch, R., Cherret, N., Simmons, C, 2004, An Analysis of the Policy and Educational Applications of the Ecological Footprint – A report to WWF Scotland, Stockholm Environment Institute York and Best Foot Forward. City Limits, a resource flow and ecological footprint analysis of Greater London, 2002, Best Foot Forward Ltd, 1–72, www.citylimitslondon.com 
  5. Craig J.R., Vaughan J., Skinner J., 2003, Zasoby Ziemi, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa, s. 14. 
  6. Ecological Footprint Standards, 2006, A Project of the Global Footprint Network Standards Committees, s. 1–34. 
  7. Ewing B., A. Reed, S.M. Rizk, A. Galli, M. Wackernagel, J. Kitzes. 2008. Calculation Methodology for the National Footprint Accounts, 2008 Edition. Oakland: Global Footprint Network, s. 1–19. 
  8. Grudziński Z., 2006, Tendencje zmian cen energii elektrycznej w latach 2002–2005, Polityka Energetyczna, t. 9, z. 1. Wyd. Instytutu Gospodarki Surowcami Mineralnymi i Energią PAN, Kraków, s. 45–60. 
  9. Flis J., 1986, Szkolny słownik geograficzny, Wydawnictwo Szkolne i Pedagogiczne, Warszawa, 24. 
  10. Kompendium wiedzy o ekologii, 2003, Strzałko J., Mossor-Pietraszewska T. (red.), Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa. 
  11. Kozłowski S., 2007, Przyszłość ekorozwoju, Wydawnictwo KUL, Lublin, s. 45–180. 
  12. Kulczycka J., 2001, Ekologiczna ocean cyklu życia (LCA) nową techniką zarządzania środowiskowego, Wydawnictwo Instytut Gospodarki Surowcami Mineralnymi i Energią PAN, Kraków, s. 8. 
  13. Lenzen, M., Murray, S. A., 2001. A modified ecological footprint method and its application to Australia, Ecological Economics 37, s. 229–255. 
  14. Living Planet Report 2008 (2008 WWF), for a living planet, http://assets.panda.org/downloads/ living_planet_report_2008.pdf 
  15. Living Planet Report 2010, Biodiversity, biocapacity and development, 2010, http://wwf.panda.org/about_our_earth/all_publications/living_planet_report/2010_lpr/pdf 
  16. Maj G., 2007, Ekologiczny ślad miasta Warszawy, maszynopis pracy magisterskiej wykonanej pod kierunkiem naukowym Wilczyńskiej-Michalik W., Archiwum UP, s. 1–213 
  17. Makowski J., 2007, Geografia fizyczna świata, PWN, Warszawa , s. 302. 
  18. Markowski J., 2003, Zarządzanie antropopresją, Wyd. Akademii Ekonomicznej w Poznaniu, Poznań, s. 72–73. 
  19. Meadows D.H., Meadows D.L., Randers J., 1995, Przekraczanie granic. Globalne załamanie czy bezpieczna przyszłość?, Centrum Uniwersalizmu przy Uniwersytecie Warszawskim, Polskie Towarzystwo Współpracy z Klubem Rzymskim, Warszawa, s. 1–270. 
  20. Mesarović M., Pestel E., 1977, Ludzkość w punkcie zwrotnym? Drugi Raport dla Klubu Rzymskiego, Państwowe Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne, Warszawa, s. 1–212. Our Common Future, 1987, G.H. Brundtland (red.), The Word commission on environment and development, Oxford University Press, s. 1–400. 
  21. Rees W., 1992, Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: what urban economics leaves out?, Environment and Urbanisation, Vol. 4, no 2. 
  22. Rees W., Wackernagel M., 1996, Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth, New Society Publishers, Vancouver, s. 1–178. 
  23. Rudnicka K., 2007, Ekologiczny ślad Krakowa, maszynopis pracy magisterskiej wykonanej pod kierunkiem naukowym Wilczyńskiej-Michalik W., Archiwum UP, s. 1–100. 
  24. Sharratt P., Wackernagel M., 2003, Towards a Sustainable London: Reducing the Capital’s Ecological Footprint Phase 1 Report: Determining London’s Ecological Footprint and priority Impact Areas for Action , WSP Environmental Ltd & Natural Strategies LLC, s. 1–41. 
  25. Śleszyński J., 2000, Ekonomiczne problemy ochrony środowiska, Agencja Wydawnicza ARIES, Warszawa, s. 1–416. 
  26. Vergoulas G., Levis K., Jenkins N., 2003, An ecological footprint analysis of Angus – Scotland, Angus Council, Best Foot Forward Ltd, Oxford, ss. 1–38, www.bestfootforward.com Wackernagel M., Monfreda Ch., Moran D., Wermer P., Goldfinger S., Deumling D., Murray M., 2005, National Footprint and Biocapacity Accounts 2005: The underlying calculation method, Global Footprint Network, Oakland, 1–33, www.footprintnetwork.org/ 
  27. Weiner J., 2005, Życie i ewolucja biosfery, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, s. 29–30. 

NotesEmbed ?

top

You must be logged in to post comments.

To embed these notes on your page include the following JavaScript code on your page where you want the notes to appear.

Only the controls for the widget will be shown in your chosen language. Notes will be shown in their authored language.

Tells the widget how many notes to show per page. You can cycle through additional notes using the next and previous controls.

    
                

                
Note: Best practice suggests putting the JavaScript code just before the closing </body> tag.