Tourist traffic monitoring in the Pieniny National Park (results of tourist traffic monitoring carried out in the years 2007–2009 by SKNG

Witold Warcholik; Marcin Semczuk; Marcin Baranowski

Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis Studia Geographica (2010)

  • Volume: 1, page 49-57
  • ISSN: 2084-5456

Abstract

top
The paper presents the results of tourist traffic monitoring carried out in the years 2007–2009 by SKNG UP in the Pieniny National Park. The study included a survey of 25612 visitor sand allowed estimating the intensity and spatial variability of tourist traffic in the Pieniny National Park, as well as determining the main routes and the most popular marked paths within the Park. The questionnaires helped to determine the types and preferences of the visitors to the Pieniny National Park. During 19 days of monitoring, carried out repeatedly in 2007, 2008 and 2009, surveyors standing at selected measure points counted and surveyed the visitors for 7 hours per day (9 am–4 pm). In July 2007, the intensity of tourist traffic in the PPN reached 1408 persons per day (60 visitors/1km2 of PPN/day), it was 1160 persons per day (49 visitors/1km2 of PPN/day) in July 2008, and 1477 persons/day (63 visitors/1km2 of PPN/day) in July 2009. The most popular routes in the PPN include: the section between Przełęcz Szopka–Trzy Korony with 1200, 948 and 1238 persons per day in the years 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively; the section Wymiarki–Limierczyki with 1000, 720 and 1071 visitors per day (2007, 2008,2009, respectively), and the section Sokolica–Przełęcz Sosnów: 500, 350, and 700 visitors perday (2007, 2008, 2009, respectively). The most popular place to visit in the Pieniny National Park was Krościenko, receiving twice as many visitors as the largest tourist resort in this region – Szczawnica. Their average age was about 30 years and approximately half of the respondents were people who hold a university degree. The majority of the tourists came from Lesser Poland, Silesia, Masovian and Lodz voivodeships (total number of over 50%). Those who were visiting the Pieniny for the fifth time or more often prevailed among Lesser Poland inhabitants, furthermore they were also the major part of the one-day visitors to these mountains. Krościenko and Szczawnica turned out to be the most popular accommodation places, chosen by 61% of the tourists. Vast majority of the guests reported a three-day minimum stay and most of them gave preference to private accommodation.

How to cite

top

Witold Warcholik, Marcin Semczuk, and Marcin Baranowski. "Monitoring ruchu turystycznego w Pienińskim Parku Narodowym." Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis Studia Geographica 1 (2010): 49-57. <http://eudml.org/doc/296654>.

@article{WitoldWarcholik2010,
abstract = {The paper presents the results of tourist traffic monitoring carried out in the years 2007–2009 by SKNG UP in the Pieniny National Park. The study included a survey of 25612 visitor sand allowed estimating the intensity and spatial variability of tourist traffic in the Pieniny National Park, as well as determining the main routes and the most popular marked paths within the Park. The questionnaires helped to determine the types and preferences of the visitors to the Pieniny National Park. During 19 days of monitoring, carried out repeatedly in 2007, 2008 and 2009, surveyors standing at selected measure points counted and surveyed the visitors for 7 hours per day (9 am–4 pm). In July 2007, the intensity of tourist traffic in the PPN reached 1408 persons per day (60 visitors/1km2 of PPN/day), it was 1160 persons per day (49 visitors/1km2 of PPN/day) in July 2008, and 1477 persons/day (63 visitors/1km2 of PPN/day) in July 2009. The most popular routes in the PPN include: the section between Przełęcz Szopka–Trzy Korony with 1200, 948 and 1238 persons per day in the years 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively; the section Wymiarki–Limierczyki with 1000, 720 and 1071 visitors per day (2007, 2008,2009, respectively), and the section Sokolica–Przełęcz Sosnów: 500, 350, and 700 visitors perday (2007, 2008, 2009, respectively). The most popular place to visit in the Pieniny National Park was Krościenko, receiving twice as many visitors as the largest tourist resort in this region – Szczawnica. Their average age was about 30 years and approximately half of the respondents were people who hold a university degree. The majority of the tourists came from Lesser Poland, Silesia, Masovian and Lodz voivodeships (total number of over 50%). Those who were visiting the Pieniny for the fifth time or more often prevailed among Lesser Poland inhabitants, furthermore they were also the major part of the one-day visitors to these mountains. Krościenko and Szczawnica turned out to be the most popular accommodation places, chosen by 61% of the tourists. Vast majority of the guests reported a three-day minimum stay and most of them gave preference to private accommodation.},
author = {Witold Warcholik, Marcin Semczuk, Marcin Baranowski},
journal = {Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis Studia Geographica},
keywords = {monitoring ruchu turystycznego; turystyka; antropopresja; Pieniński Park Narodowy},
language = {pol},
pages = {49-57},
title = {Monitoring ruchu turystycznego w Pienińskim Parku Narodowym},
url = {http://eudml.org/doc/296654},
volume = {1},
year = {2010},
}

TY - JOUR
AU - Witold Warcholik
AU - Marcin Semczuk
AU - Marcin Baranowski
TI - Monitoring ruchu turystycznego w Pienińskim Parku Narodowym
JO - Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis Studia Geographica
PY - 2010
VL - 1
SP - 49
EP - 57
AB - The paper presents the results of tourist traffic monitoring carried out in the years 2007–2009 by SKNG UP in the Pieniny National Park. The study included a survey of 25612 visitor sand allowed estimating the intensity and spatial variability of tourist traffic in the Pieniny National Park, as well as determining the main routes and the most popular marked paths within the Park. The questionnaires helped to determine the types and preferences of the visitors to the Pieniny National Park. During 19 days of monitoring, carried out repeatedly in 2007, 2008 and 2009, surveyors standing at selected measure points counted and surveyed the visitors for 7 hours per day (9 am–4 pm). In July 2007, the intensity of tourist traffic in the PPN reached 1408 persons per day (60 visitors/1km2 of PPN/day), it was 1160 persons per day (49 visitors/1km2 of PPN/day) in July 2008, and 1477 persons/day (63 visitors/1km2 of PPN/day) in July 2009. The most popular routes in the PPN include: the section between Przełęcz Szopka–Trzy Korony with 1200, 948 and 1238 persons per day in the years 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively; the section Wymiarki–Limierczyki with 1000, 720 and 1071 visitors per day (2007, 2008,2009, respectively), and the section Sokolica–Przełęcz Sosnów: 500, 350, and 700 visitors perday (2007, 2008, 2009, respectively). The most popular place to visit in the Pieniny National Park was Krościenko, receiving twice as many visitors as the largest tourist resort in this region – Szczawnica. Their average age was about 30 years and approximately half of the respondents were people who hold a university degree. The majority of the tourists came from Lesser Poland, Silesia, Masovian and Lodz voivodeships (total number of over 50%). Those who were visiting the Pieniny for the fifth time or more often prevailed among Lesser Poland inhabitants, furthermore they were also the major part of the one-day visitors to these mountains. Krościenko and Szczawnica turned out to be the most popular accommodation places, chosen by 61% of the tourists. Vast majority of the guests reported a three-day minimum stay and most of them gave preference to private accommodation.
LA - pol
KW - monitoring ruchu turystycznego; turystyka; antropopresja; Pieniński Park Narodowy
UR - http://eudml.org/doc/296654
ER -

References

top
  1. Celichowski A., 1976, Plan ogólny zagospodarowania przestrzennego Pienińskiego Parku Narodowego. I etap – Prace przygotowawcze i zebranie materiałów, maszynopis, Dyrekcja Pienińskiego Parku Narodowego. 
  2. Czapski Z., Mizgajska H., 1996, Biologiczne skażenie szlaków turystycznych Tatrzańskiego Parku Narodowego, [w:] Krzan Z. (red.), Przyroda Tatrzańskiego Parku Narodowego a człowiek, 3. Wpływ człowieka, Kraków–Zakopane, s. 46–47. 
  3. Czarnecki K., 2009, Atrakcyjność turystyczna i ruch turystyczny w parkach narodowych województwa podlaskiego, Zeszyty Naukowe SGGW, 73, Ekonomika i Organizacja Gospodarki żywnościowej, s. 165–175. 
  4. Czochański J., 2000, Wpływ użytkowania turystycznego na rozwój procesów i form erozyjno - denudacyjnych w otoczeniu szlaków, [w:] Czochański J., Borowiak D. (red.), Z badań geograficznych w Tatrach Polskich, Wyd. Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego, Gdańsk, s. 331–344. 
  5. Degórski M., 2002, Ocena wpływu antropopresji na wybrane właściwości pokrywy glebowej piętra subalpejskiego i alpejskiego w rejonie Kasprowego Wierchu, [w:] W. Borowiec, Kotarba A., Kownacki A., Krzan Z., Mirek Z. (red.), Przemiany środowiska przyrodniczego Tatr, Instytut Botaniki PAN, Kraków–Zakopane, s. 395–402. 
  6. Fidelus J., 2008, Rola ruchu turystycznego w przekształcaniu ścieżek i dróg turystycznych na obszarze TPN, Prace Geograficzne IGiPZ, 120, s. 20–29. 
  7. Fischbach J., 1985, Wielkość i struktura ruchu turystycznego w Pienińskim Parku Narodowym, maszynopis, Dyrekcja Pienińskiego Parku Narodowego. 
  8. Gorczyca E., 2000, Wpływ ruchu turystycznego na przekształcenie rzeźby wysokogórskiej na przykładzie Masywu Czerwonych Wierchów i Regli Zakopiańskich (Tatry Zachodnie), Prace Geograficzne IGiPZ, 105, s. 369–389. 
  9. Kasprzak M., 2005, Tempo degradacji powierzchni dróg i ścieżek turystycznych w Karkonoszach Wschodnich, Opera Corcontica, 41, s. 17–30. 
  10. Guzikowa M., 1982,Wpływ pieszego ruchu turystycznego na szatę roślinną Pienińskiego Parku Narodowego (wybrane zagadnienia, ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem skutków wydeptania), Studia Naturae, Seria A, PAN, 22, s. 227–241. 
  11. Krusiec M., 1996, Wpływ ruchu turystycznego na przekształcenie rzeźby Tatr Zachodnich na przykładzie Doliny Chochołowskiej, Czasopismo Geograficzne, 67, 3–4, s. 303–320. 
  12. Łajczak A., 1996, Wpływ narciarstwa i turystyki pieszej na erozję gleby w obszarze podszczytowym Pilska, [w:] Łajczak A., Michalik S., Witkowski Z. (red.), Wpływ narciarstwa i turystyki pieszej na przyrodę masywu Pilska, Studia Naturae, Seria A, PAN, 41, s. 131–159. 
  13. Prędki R., 2002, Wpływ ruchu turystycznego na teksturę oraz właściwości wodne gleb w obrębie szlaków pieszych Bieszczadzkiego Parku Narodowego, [w:] Partyka J. (red.), Użytkowanie parków narodowych. Ruch turystyczny – zagospodarowanie – konflikty – zagrożenia, Wyd. Ojcowski Park Narodowy, Ojców, s. 763–770. 
  14. Prędki R., 2006, Bieszczadzki Park Narodowy w świetle badań ankietowych turystów na szlakach pieszych w latach 2004–2005, Rocznik Bieszczadzki, 14, s. 285–297. 
  15. Skawiński P., 1993, Oddziaływanie człowieka na przyrodę kopuły Kasprowego Wierchu oraz Doliny Goryczkowej w Tatrach, [w:] W. Cichocki (red.), Ochrona Tatr w obliczu zagrożeń, Wyd. Muzeum Tatrzańskiego, Zakopane, s. 197–226. 
  16. Skawiński P., Krzan Z., 2002, Restytucja szaty roślinnej kopuły Kasprowego Wierchu w latach 1993–2001, [w:] Borowiec W., Kotarba A., Kownacki A., Krzan Z., Mirek Z. (red.), Przemiany środowiska przyrodniczego Tatr, Instytut Botaniki PAN, Kraków–Zakopane, s. 407–411. 
  17. Szydarowski W., 2000, Rozwój form erozyjnych w otoczeniu szlaków turystycznych Tatrzańskiego Parku Narodowego, [w:] Czochański J., Borowiak D. (red.) Z badań geograficznych w Tatrach Polskich, Wyd. Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego, Gdańsk, s. 315–328. 
  18. Wałdykowski P., 2006, Wpływ dróg górskich na dynamikę procesów morfogenetycznych w rejonie Turbacza, Ochrona Beskidów Zachodnich, 1, s. 67–79. 
  19. Wieniawska-Raj B., 2007,Dynamika ruch u turystycznego w Karkonoskim Parku Narodowym, [w:] Štursa J. & Knapik R. (red.), Geoekologické problémy Krkonoš. Sborn. Mez. Věd. Konf., Svoboda n. Úpou, Opera Corcontica, 44/2, s. 593–602. 

NotesEmbed ?

top

You must be logged in to post comments.

To embed these notes on your page include the following JavaScript code on your page where you want the notes to appear.

Only the controls for the widget will be shown in your chosen language. Notes will be shown in their authored language.

Tells the widget how many notes to show per page. You can cycle through additional notes using the next and previous controls.

    
                

                
Note: Best practice suggests putting the JavaScript code just before the closing </body> tag.