Super-Strict Implications

 Access to full text

 Full (PDF)

1. A. R. Anderson, N. Belnap, Entailment. The Logic of Relevance and Necessity, vol. 1, Princeton University Press (1975). 
2. R. George, Bolzano's consequence, relevance, and enthymemes, Journal of Philosophical Logic, vol. 12 (1983), pp. 299–318, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00263480 
3. J. Y. Halpern, Y. Moses, A Guide to Completeness and Complexity for Modal Logics of Knowledge and Belief, Artificial Intelligence, vol. 54(2) (1992), pp. 319–379, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(92)90049-4 
4. J. Heylen, L. Horsten, Strict Conditionals: A Negative Result, The Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 56(225) (2006), pp. 536–549, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9213.2006.457.x 
5. D. Hitchcock, Does the Traditional Treatment of Enthymemes Rest on a Mistake?, Argumentation, vol. 12 (1998), pp. 15–37, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53562-3_5 
6. C. I. Lewis, Survey of Symbolic Logic, University of California Press (1918). 
7. D. Lewis, Counterfactuals, Harvard University Press (1975). 
8. E. J. Lowe, A simplification of the logic of conditionals, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, vol. 24(3) (1983), pp. 357–366, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1305/ndj/1093870380 
9. E. J. Lowe, The Truth About Counterfactuals, The Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 45(178) (1995), pp. 41–59, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2219847 
10. S. Negri, Proof Theory for Non-normal Modal Logics: The Neighbourhood Formalism and Basic Results, IfCoLog Journal of Logic and its Applications, vol. 4 (2017), pp. 1241–1286. 
11. S. Negri, E. Orlandelli, Proof theory for quantified monotone modal logics, Logic journal of the IGPL, vol. 27(4) (2019), p. 478–506, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jigpal/jzz015 
12. S. Negri, J. von Plato, Proof Analysis, Cambridge University Press (2011). 
13. E. Nelson, Intensional relations, Mind, vol. 39 (1930), pp. 440–453. 
14. H. Omori, H. Wansing, Connexive logics. An overview and current trends, Logic and Logical Philosophy, vol. 28(3) (2019), pp. 371–387, DOI: https://doi.org/10.12775/LLP.2019.026 
15. C. Pizzi, T. Williamson, Strong Boethius' Thesis and Consequential Implication, Journal of Philosophical Logic, vol. 26 (1997), pp. 569–588, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004230028063 
16. G. Priest, Negation as cancellation and connexive logic, Topoi, vol. 18 (1999), pp. 141–148, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006294205280 
17. E. Raidl, Strengthened Conditionals, [in:] B. Liao, Y. N. Wáng (eds.), Context, Conict and Reasoning, Springer Singapore (2020), pp. 139–155, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7134-3_11 
18. H. Rasiowa, An Algebraic Approach to Non-classical Logics, Elsevier (1974). 
19. R. Routley, V. Routley, Negation and contradiction, Revista Colombiana de Matemáticas, vol. 19 (1985), pp. 201–230. 
20. R. C. Stalnaker, A Theory of Conditionals, [in:] N. Rescher (ed.), Studies in Logical Theory, Basil Blackwell (1968), pp. 98–112. 
21. A. S. Troelstra, D. van Dalen, Constructivism in Mathematics, North-Holland (1988). 
22. M. Vidal, When Conditional Logic met Connexive Logic, [in:] IWCS 2017 - 12th International Conference on Computational Semantics (2017), pp. 1–11, URL: https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W17-6816 
23. H. Wansing, D. Skurt, Negation as Cancellation, Connexive Logic, and qLPm, The Australasian Journal of Logic, vol. 15 (2018), pp. 476–488, DOI: https://doi.org/10.26686/ajl.v15i2.4869