Stranger things about forcing without AC

Martin Goldstern; Lukas D. Klausner

Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae (2020)

  • Volume: 61, Issue: 1, page 21-26
  • ISSN: 0010-2628

Abstract

top
Typically, set theorists reason about forcing constructions in the context of Zermelo--Fraenkel set theory (ZFC). We show that without the axiom of choice (AC), several simple properties of forcing posets fail to hold, one of which answers Miller's question from the work: Arnold W. Miller, {Long Borel hierarchies}, MLQ Math. Log. Q. {54} (2008), no. 3, 307--322.

How to cite

top

Goldstern, Martin, and Klausner, Lukas D.. "Stranger things about forcing without AC." Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae 61.1 (2020): 21-26. <http://eudml.org/doc/297072>.

@article{Goldstern2020,
abstract = {Typically, set theorists reason about forcing constructions in the context of Zermelo--Fraenkel set theory (ZFC). We show that without the axiom of choice (AC), several simple properties of forcing posets fail to hold, one of which answers Miller's question from the work: Arnold W. Miller, \{Long Borel hierarchies\}, MLQ Math. Log. Q. \{54\} (2008), no. 3, 307--322.},
author = {Goldstern, Martin, Klausner, Lukas D.},
journal = {Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae},
keywords = {forcing; axiom of choice; non-AC forcing; ZF},
language = {eng},
number = {1},
pages = {21-26},
publisher = {Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics},
title = {Stranger things about forcing without AC},
url = {http://eudml.org/doc/297072},
volume = {61},
year = {2020},
}

TY - JOUR
AU - Goldstern, Martin
AU - Klausner, Lukas D.
TI - Stranger things about forcing without AC
JO - Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae
PY - 2020
PB - Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics
VL - 61
IS - 1
SP - 21
EP - 26
AB - Typically, set theorists reason about forcing constructions in the context of Zermelo--Fraenkel set theory (ZFC). We show that without the axiom of choice (AC), several simple properties of forcing posets fail to hold, one of which answers Miller's question from the work: Arnold W. Miller, {Long Borel hierarchies}, MLQ Math. Log. Q. {54} (2008), no. 3, 307--322.
LA - eng
KW - forcing; axiom of choice; non-AC forcing; ZF
UR - http://eudml.org/doc/297072
ER -

References

top
  1. Karagila A., Do choice principles in all generic extensions imply AC in V ?, Answer to a MathOverflow question, 2018. 
  2. Kunen K., Set Theory: An Introduction to Independence Proofs, Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, 102, North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1983. Zbl0534.03026MR0756630
  3. Miller A. W., 10.1002/malq.200710044, MLQ Math. Log. Q. 54 (2008), no. 3, 307–322. MR2417803DOI10.1002/malq.200710044

NotesEmbed ?

top

You must be logged in to post comments.

To embed these notes on your page include the following JavaScript code on your page where you want the notes to appear.

Only the controls for the widget will be shown in your chosen language. Notes will be shown in their authored language.

Tells the widget how many notes to show per page. You can cycle through additional notes using the next and previous controls.

    
                

Note: Best practice suggests putting the JavaScript code just before the closing </body> tag.