Ternary Relational Semantics for the Variants of BN4 and E4 which Contain Routley and Meyer's Logic B
Bulletin of the Section of Logic (2021)
- Volume: 51, Issue: 1, page 27-56
- ISSN: 0138-0680
Access Full Article
topHow to cite
topSandra M. López. "Ternary Relational Semantics for the Variants of BN4 and E4 which Contain Routley and Meyer's Logic B." Bulletin of the Section of Logic 51.1 (2021): 27-56. <http://eudml.org/doc/298960>.
@article{SandraM2021,
author = {Sandra M. López},
journal = {Bulletin of the Section of Logic},
keywords = {Ternary relational semantics; relevant logics; 4-valued logics; Routley and Meyer's logic B; 4-valued quasi-relevant logics},
number = {1},
pages = {27-56},
title = {Ternary Relational Semantics for the Variants of BN4 and E4 which Contain Routley and Meyer's Logic B},
url = {http://eudml.org/doc/298960},
volume = {51},
year = {2021},
}
TY - JOUR
AU - Sandra M. López
TI - Ternary Relational Semantics for the Variants of BN4 and E4 which Contain Routley and Meyer's Logic B
JO - Bulletin of the Section of Logic
PY - 2021
VL - 51
IS - 1
SP - 27
EP - 56
KW - Ternary relational semantics; relevant logics; 4-valued logics; Routley and Meyer's logic B; 4-valued quasi-relevant logics
UR - http://eudml.org/doc/298960
ER -
References
top- A. R. Anderson, N. D. Belnap, Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Necessity, vol. I, Princeton University Press (1975).
- A. R. Anderson, N. D. Belnap, J. M. Dunn, Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Necessity, vol. II, Princeton University Press (1992).
- R. T. Brady, Completeness proofs for the systems RM3 and BN4, Logique et Analyse, vol. 25 (1982), pp. 9–32.
- R. T. Brady (ed.), Relevant Logics and their Rivals, vol. II, Ashgate (2003).
- R. T. Brady, Universal Logic, CSLI (2006).
- S. M. López, Belnap-Dunn semantics for the variants of BN4 and E4 which contain Routley and Meyer’s logic B, Logic and Logical Philosophy, (Online First), pp. 1–28, DOI: https://doi.org/10.12775/LLP.2021.004
- R. K. Meyer, S. Giambrone, R. T. Brady, Where Gamma fails, Studia Logica, vol. 43 (1984), pp. 247–256, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02429841
- H. Omori, H. Wansing, 40 years of FDE: An Introductory Overview, Studia Logica, vol. 105 (2017), pp. 1021–1049, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-017-9748-6
- G. Robles, J. M. Blanco, S. M. López, J. R. Paradela, M. M. Recio, Relational Semantics for the 4-valued relevant logics BN4 and E4, Logic and Logical Philosophy, vol. 25(2) (2016), pp. 173–201, DOI: https://doi.org/10.12775/LLP.2016.006
- G. Robles, J. M. Méndez, A companion to Brady’s 4-valued relevant logic BN4: The 4-valued logic of entailment E4, Logic Journal of the IGLP, vol. 24(5) (2016), pp. 838–858, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jigpal/jzw011
- R. Routley, V. Plumwood, R. K. Meyer, R. T. Brady, Relevant Logics and their Rivals, vol. I, Ridgeview (1982).
- J. K. Slaney, Relevant Logic and Paraconsistency, [in:] L. Bertossi, A. Hunter, T. Schaub (eds.), Inconsistency Tolerance, vol. 3300 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer (2005), pp. 270–293, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30597-2_9
- R. Sylvan, V. Plumwood, Non-normal relevant logics, [in:] R. T. Brady (ed.), Relevant Logics and their Rivals, vol. II, Western Philosophy Series, Ashgate, Aldershot and Burlington (2003), pp. 10–16.
NotesEmbed ?
topTo embed these notes on your page include the following JavaScript code on your page where you want the notes to appear.