Letter to the editor: Consistency of LPC+Ch

Jorma K. Mattila

Kybernetika (1998)

  • Volume: 34, Issue: 2, page [235]-237
  • ISSN: 0023-5954

Abstract

top
In his paper [Kybernetika 31, No. 1, 99–106 (1995; Zbl 0857.03042)], E. Turunen says in the corollary on p. 106: “Notice that the third last line on page 195 in [J. K. Mattila, “Modifier logic”, in: J. Kacprzyk (ed.) et al., Fuzzy logic for the management of uncertainty. New York: Wiley. 191–209 (1992)] stating that LPC+Ch calculus is consistent is not correct.” The system LPC+Ch is consistent, which can be seen quite trivially.

How to cite

top

Mattila, Jorma K.. "Letter to the editor: Consistency of LPC+Ch." Kybernetika 34.2 (1998): [235]-237. <http://eudml.org/doc/33350>.

@article{Mattila1998,
abstract = {In his paper [Kybernetika 31, No. 1, 99–106 (1995; Zbl 0857.03042)], E. Turunen says in the corollary on p. 106: “Notice that the third last line on page 195 in [J. K. Mattila, “Modifier logic”, in: J. Kacprzyk (ed.) et al., Fuzzy logic for the management of uncertainty. New York: Wiley. 191–209 (1992)] stating that LPC+Ch calculus is consistent is not correct.” The system LPC+Ch is consistent, which can be seen quite trivially.},
author = {Mattila, Jorma K.},
journal = {Kybernetika},
keywords = {system LPC+Ch; consistency; system LPC+Ch; consistency},
language = {eng},
number = {2},
pages = {[235]-237},
publisher = {Institute of Information Theory and Automation AS CR},
title = {Letter to the editor: Consistency of LPC+Ch},
url = {http://eudml.org/doc/33350},
volume = {34},
year = {1998},
}

TY - JOUR
AU - Mattila, Jorma K.
TI - Letter to the editor: Consistency of LPC+Ch
JO - Kybernetika
PY - 1998
PB - Institute of Information Theory and Automation AS CR
VL - 34
IS - 2
SP - [235]
EP - 237
AB - In his paper [Kybernetika 31, No. 1, 99–106 (1995; Zbl 0857.03042)], E. Turunen says in the corollary on p. 106: “Notice that the third last line on page 195 in [J. K. Mattila, “Modifier logic”, in: J. Kacprzyk (ed.) et al., Fuzzy logic for the management of uncertainty. New York: Wiley. 191–209 (1992)] stating that LPC+Ch calculus is consistent is not correct.” The system LPC+Ch is consistent, which can be seen quite trivially.
LA - eng
KW - system LPC+Ch; consistency; system LPC+Ch; consistency
UR - http://eudml.org/doc/33350
ER -

References

top
  1. Hughes G. E., Cresswell M. J., An Introduction to Modal Logic, Methuen, London 1968 (reprinted New York 1985) (1968) Zbl0205.00503MR0439586
  2. Mattila J. K., Modifier logic, In: Fuzzy Logic for the Management of Uncertainty (J. Kacprzyk and L. A. Zadeh, eds.). J. Wiley, New York 1992, pp. 191–209 (1992) 
  3. Mattila J. K., Modified modus ponens and modal logic, Kybernetika (Supplement) 28 (1992), 28–32 (1992) Zbl0861.03011MR1226047
  4. Turunen E., Algebraic analysis of LPC+Ch calculus, Kybernetika 31 (1995), 1, 99–106 (1995) MR1324663

NotesEmbed ?

top

You must be logged in to post comments.

To embed these notes on your page include the following JavaScript code on your page where you want the notes to appear.

Only the controls for the widget will be shown in your chosen language. Notes will be shown in their authored language.

Tells the widget how many notes to show per page. You can cycle through additional notes using the next and previous controls.

    
                

                
Note: Best practice suggests putting the JavaScript code just before the closing </body> tag.