Measure-preserving quality within mappings.

Stephen Semmes

Revista Matemática Iberoamericana (2000)

  • Volume: 16, Issue: 2, page 363-458
  • ISSN: 0213-2230

Abstract

top
In [6], Guy David introduced some methods for finding controlled behavior in Lipschitz mappings with substantial images (in terms of measure). Under suitable conditions, David produces subsets on which the given mapping is bilipschitz, with uniform bounds for the bilipschitz constant and the size of the subset. This has applications for boundedness of singular integral operators and uniform rectifiability of sets, as in [6], [7], [11], [13]. Some special cases of David's results, concerning projections of subsets of Euclidean spaces of codimension 1, or mappings defined on Euclidean spaces (rather than sets or metric spaces of less simple nature), have been given alternate and much simpler proofs as in [8], [19], [10]. In general, this has not occurred.Here we shall present a variation of David's methods which breaks down into simpler pieces. We shall also take advantage of some components of the work of Peter Jones [19]. Jones' approach uses some Littlewood-Paley theory, and one of the important features of David's method was to avoid this, operating in a more directly geometric way which could be applied more broadly. To some extent, the present organization gives a reconciliation between the two, and between David's stopping-time argument and techniques related to Carleson measures and Carleson's Corona construction.

How to cite

top

Semmes, Stephen. "Measure-preserving quality within mappings.." Revista Matemática Iberoamericana 16.2 (2000): 363-458. <http://eudml.org/doc/39603>.

@article{Semmes2000,
abstract = {In [6], Guy David introduced some methods for finding controlled behavior in Lipschitz mappings with substantial images (in terms of measure). Under suitable conditions, David produces subsets on which the given mapping is bilipschitz, with uniform bounds for the bilipschitz constant and the size of the subset. This has applications for boundedness of singular integral operators and uniform rectifiability of sets, as in [6], [7], [11], [13]. Some special cases of David's results, concerning projections of subsets of Euclidean spaces of codimension 1, or mappings defined on Euclidean spaces (rather than sets or metric spaces of less simple nature), have been given alternate and much simpler proofs as in [8], [19], [10]. In general, this has not occurred.Here we shall present a variation of David's methods which breaks down into simpler pieces. We shall also take advantage of some components of the work of Peter Jones [19]. Jones' approach uses some Littlewood-Paley theory, and one of the important features of David's method was to avoid this, operating in a more directly geometric way which could be applied more broadly. To some extent, the present organization gives a reconciliation between the two, and between David's stopping-time argument and techniques related to Carleson measures and Carleson's Corona construction.},
author = {Semmes, Stephen},
journal = {Revista Matemática Iberoamericana},
keywords = {Aplicación lipschitziana; Integrales singulares; Espacios métricos; Lipschitz maps; bilipschitz maps; Carleson sets; singular integral operators},
language = {eng},
number = {2},
pages = {363-458},
title = {Measure-preserving quality within mappings.},
url = {http://eudml.org/doc/39603},
volume = {16},
year = {2000},
}

TY - JOUR
AU - Semmes, Stephen
TI - Measure-preserving quality within mappings.
JO - Revista Matemática Iberoamericana
PY - 2000
VL - 16
IS - 2
SP - 363
EP - 458
AB - In [6], Guy David introduced some methods for finding controlled behavior in Lipschitz mappings with substantial images (in terms of measure). Under suitable conditions, David produces subsets on which the given mapping is bilipschitz, with uniform bounds for the bilipschitz constant and the size of the subset. This has applications for boundedness of singular integral operators and uniform rectifiability of sets, as in [6], [7], [11], [13]. Some special cases of David's results, concerning projections of subsets of Euclidean spaces of codimension 1, or mappings defined on Euclidean spaces (rather than sets or metric spaces of less simple nature), have been given alternate and much simpler proofs as in [8], [19], [10]. In general, this has not occurred.Here we shall present a variation of David's methods which breaks down into simpler pieces. We shall also take advantage of some components of the work of Peter Jones [19]. Jones' approach uses some Littlewood-Paley theory, and one of the important features of David's method was to avoid this, operating in a more directly geometric way which could be applied more broadly. To some extent, the present organization gives a reconciliation between the two, and between David's stopping-time argument and techniques related to Carleson measures and Carleson's Corona construction.
LA - eng
KW - Aplicación lipschitziana; Integrales singulares; Espacios métricos; Lipschitz maps; bilipschitz maps; Carleson sets; singular integral operators
UR - http://eudml.org/doc/39603
ER -

NotesEmbed ?

top

You must be logged in to post comments.

To embed these notes on your page include the following JavaScript code on your page where you want the notes to appear.

Only the controls for the widget will be shown in your chosen language. Notes will be shown in their authored language.

Tells the widget how many notes to show per page. You can cycle through additional notes using the next and previous controls.

    
                

Note: Best practice suggests putting the JavaScript code just before the closing </body> tag.