The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

The search session has expired. Please query the service again.

Currently displaying 1 – 2 of 2

Showing per page

Order by Relevance | Title | Year of publication

Making sense of capitulation: reciprocal primes

David Folk — 2016

Acta Arithmetica

Let ℓ be a rational prime, K be a number field that contains a primitive ℓth root of unity, L an abelian extension of K whose degree over K, [L:K], is divisible by ℓ, a prime ideal of K whose ideal class has order ℓ in the ideal class group of K, and a any generator of the principal ideal . We will call a prime ideal of K ’reciprocal to ’ if its Frobenius element generates G a l ( K ( a ) / K ) for every choice of a . We then show that becomes principal in L if and only if every reciprocal prime is not a norm inside...

Page 1

Download Results (CSV)