The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
This paper discusses the fundamental combinatorial question of
whether or not, for a given string , there exists a morphism
such that is unambiguous with respect to ,
there exists no other morphism satisfying
() = (). While Freydenberger
[ (2006) 601–628]
characterise those strings for which there exists an
unambiguous morphism , little is known
about the unambiguity of morphisms, morphisms
that map symbols onto the empty string. The present paper
demonstrates that, in contrast...
Download Results (CSV)