The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
In this paper, we rule out the possibility that a certain method of proof in the sums differences conjecture can settle the Kakeya Conjecture.
In this paper, we prove sufficient conditions on pairs of weights (u,v) (scalar, matrix or operator valued) so that the Hilbert transform
H f(x) = p.v. ∫ [f(y) / x - y] dy,
is bounded from L2(u) to L2(v).
In his recent lecture at the International Congress [S], Stephen Semmes stated the following conjecture for which we provide a proof.
Theorem. Suppose Ω is a bounded open set in Rn with n > 2, and suppose that B(0,1) ⊂ Ω, Hn-1(∂Ω) = M < ∞ (depending on n and M) and a Lipschitz graph Γ (with constant L) such that Hn-1(Γ ∩ ∂Ω) ≥ ε.
Here Hk...
Download Results (CSV)