The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The authors present three methods for proving Poisson's theorem. The first method is based on papers of L. Takács [J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 62 (1967), 102–113; MR0217832] and J. Galambos [J. Appl. Probab. 11 (1974), 219–222; MR0358923], the second uses results of D. A. Freedman [Ann. Probab. 2 (1974), 256–269; MR0370694] and M. R. Leadbetter [Z. Wahrsch. Verw. Gebiete 28 (1973/74), 298–309; MR0362465], and the third method follows the considerations contained in another paper by Galambos [ibid....
Download Results (CSV)