The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
A number of methodological papers published during the last years
testify that a need for a thorough revision of the research
methodology is felt by the operations research community – see, for
example, [Barr
(1995) 9–32; Eiben and Jelasity,
582–587; Hooker,
(1995) 33–42; Rardin and Uzsoy,
(2001) 261–304]. In particular, the
performance evaluation of nondeterministic methods, including widely
studied metaheuristics such as evolutionary computation...
Download Results (CSV)