On the lattice automorphisms of certain simple algebraic groups
We show, with a counterexample, that proposition 3 in [2], as it stands, is not correct; we prove however that by changing the hypothesis the thesis of the proposition remains still valid.
We show, with a counterexample, that proposition 3 in [2], as it stands, is not correct; we prove however that by changing the hypothesis the thesis of the proposition remains still valid.
We give criteria for a wreath product to have complemented subgroup-lattice.
Page 1