The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The Parikh finite word automaton (PA) was introduced and studied in 2003 by Klaedtke and Rueß. Natural variants of the PA arise from viewing a PA equivalently as an automaton that keeps a count of its transitions and semilinearly constrains their numbers. Here we adopt this view and define the , that extends the PA by having each transition induce an affine transformation on the PA registers, and the , that restricts the PA by forcing any two transitions on the same letter to affect the registers...
The Parikh finite word automaton (PA) was introduced and studied in 2003 by Klaedtke and
Rueß. Natural variants of the PA arise from viewing a PA equivalently as an automaton that
keeps a count of its transitions and semilinearly constrains their numbers. Here we adopt
this view and define the , that extends the PA by having each
transition induce an affine transformation on the PA registers, and the , that restricts the PA by forcing any two transitions on...
The Parikh finite word automaton (PA) was introduced and studied in 2003 by Klaedtke and
Rueß. Natural variants of the PA arise from viewing a PA equivalently as an automaton that
keeps a count of its transitions and semilinearly constrains their numbers. Here we adopt
this view and define the , that extends the PA by having each
transition induce an affine transformation on the PA registers, and the , that restricts the PA by forcing any two transitions on...
Download Results (CSV)