The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
This paper deals with the basic preconditioning and deflation variants of the FETI-1 and TFETI-1 methods, with (T)FETI-1 with deflation being called (T)FETI-2. It also presents the results of numerical experiments performed on a simple benchmark 2D problem of linear elasticity to compare the computational efficiency of FETI-1 and TFETI-1 and each variant of their preconditioning or deflation in terms of number of executed CG iterations.
Download Results (CSV)