Resolving triple systems into regular configurations.
Mendelsohn, E., Quattrocchi, G. (2000)
The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics [electronic only]
Similarity:
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
Mendelsohn, E., Quattrocchi, G. (2000)
The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics [electronic only]
Similarity:
Buratti, Marco, Yan, Jie, Wang, Chengmin (2010)
The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics [electronic only]
Similarity:
Chee, Yeow Meng (2004)
The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics [electronic only]
Similarity:
Danziger, Peter, Stevens, Brett (2004)
The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics [electronic only]
Similarity:
Danziger, Peter, Stevens, Brett (2004)
The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics [electronic only]
Similarity:
Griggs, T.S., Rosa, A. (1994)
Acta Mathematica Universitatis Comenianae. New Series
Similarity:
Charles J. Colbourn, Jeffrey H. Dinitz (2000)
Mathematica Slovaca
Similarity:
Greig, Melcom (2000)
The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics [electronic only]
Similarity:
Chen, Kejun, Wei, Ruizhong (2006)
The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics [electronic only]
Similarity:
K. Pukanow, K. Wilczyńska (1981)
Colloquium Mathematicae
Similarity:
Yan, Jie, Wang, Chengmin (2009)
The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics [electronic only]
Similarity:
Łukasz Smaga (2016)
Biometrical Letters
Similarity:
This paper considers main effects plans used to study m two-level factors using n runs which are partitioned into b blocks of equal size k = n/b. The assumptions are adopted that n ≡ 2 (mod 8) and k > 2 is even. Certain designs not having all main effects orthogonal to blocks were shown by Jacroux (2011a) to be D-optimal when (m − 2)(k − 2) + 2 ⩽ n ⩽ (m − 1)(k − 2) + 2. Here, we extend that result. For (m − 3)(k − 2) + 2 ⩽ n < (m − 2)(k − 2) + 2, the D-optimality of those designs...