Resolving triple systems into regular configurations.
Mendelsohn, E., Quattrocchi, G. (2000)
The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics [electronic only]
Similarity:
Displaying similar documents to “Small group divisible Steiner quadruple systems.”
Resolving triple systems into regular configurations.
From a 1-rotational RBIBD to a partitioned difference family.
Buratti, Marco, Yan, Jie, Wang, Chengmin (2010)
The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics [electronic only]
Similarity:
Steiner triple systems intersecting in pairwise disjoint blocks.
Chee, Yeow Meng (2004)
The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics [electronic only]
Similarity:
Class-uniformly resolvable group divisible structures. II: Frames.
Danziger, Peter, Stevens, Brett (2004)
The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics [electronic only]
Similarity:
Class-uniformly resolvable group divisible structures. I: Resolvable group divisible designs.
Danziger, Peter, Stevens, Brett (2004)
The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics [electronic only]
Similarity:
Avoidance in triple systems.
Griggs, T.S., Rosa, A. (1994)
Acta Mathematica Universitatis Comenianae. New Series
Similarity:
Generating sets in Steiner triple systems
Charles J. Colbourn, Jeffrey H. Dinitz (2000)
Mathematica Slovaca
Similarity:
Some pairwise balanced designs.
Greig, Melcom (2000)
The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics [electronic only]
Similarity:
A few more cyclic Steiner 2-designs.
Chen, Kejun, Wei, Ruizhong (2006)
The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics [electronic only]
Similarity:
A construction of resolvable quadruple systems
K. Pukanow, K. Wilczyńska (1981)
Colloquium Mathematicae
Similarity:
The existence of FGDRP's.
Yan, Jie, Wang, Chengmin (2009)
The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics [electronic only]
Similarity:
A note on the D-optimality and D-efficiency of nonorthogonal blocked main effects plans
Łukasz Smaga (2016)
Biometrical Letters
Similarity:
This paper considers main effects plans used to study m two-level factors using n runs which are partitioned into b blocks of equal size k = n/b. The assumptions are adopted that n ≡ 2 (mod 8) and k > 2 is even. Certain designs not having all main effects orthogonal to blocks were shown by Jacroux (2011a) to be D-optimal when (m − 2)(k − 2) + 2 ⩽ n ⩽ (m − 1)(k − 2) + 2. Here, we extend that result. For (m − 3)(k − 2) + 2 ⩽ n < (m − 2)(k − 2) + 2, the D-optimality of those designs...