The independence of the axiom of choice from the Boolean prime ideal theorem
J. Halperin (1964)
Fundamenta Mathematicae
Similarity:
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
The search session has expired. Please query the service again.
J. Halperin (1964)
Fundamenta Mathematicae
Similarity:
B. R. Salinas, F. Bombal (1973)
Collectanea Mathematica
Similarity:
Miroslav Repický (2015)
Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae
Similarity:
We present a proof of the Boolean Prime Ideal Theorem in a transitive model of ZF in which the Axiom of Choice does not hold. We omit the argument based on the full Halpern-Läuchli partition theorem and instead we reduce the proof to its elementary case.
Josef Tkadlec (1991)
Colloquium Mathematicae
Similarity:
We fix a Boolean subalgebra B of an orthomodular poset P and study the mappings s:P → [0,1] which respect the ordering and the orthocomplementation in P and which are additive on B. We call such functions B-states on P. We first show that every P possesses "enough" two-valued B-states. This improves the main result in [13], where B is the centre of P. Moreover, it allows us to construct a closure-space representation of orthomodular lattices. We do this in the third section. This result...
J. Bell, David Fremlin (1972)
Fundamenta Mathematicae
Similarity:
G. Gardiner (1974)
Fundamenta Mathematicae
Similarity:
Eric Schechter (2006)
Fundamenta Mathematicae
Similarity:
The principle that "any product of cofinite topologies is compact" is equivalent (without appealing to the Axiom of Choice) to the Boolean Prime Ideal Theorem.
J. Łoś (1957)
Fundamenta Mathematicae
Similarity:
J. Łoś, Czesław Ryll-Nardzewski (1955)
Fundamenta Mathematicae
Similarity: