Displaying similar documents to “D0L sequence equivalence is in P for fixed alphabets”

Elementary sequences.

Beslin, Scott J. (1992)

International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences

Similarity:

On a Theorem by Van Vleck Regarding Sturm Sequences

Akritas, Alkiviadis, Malaschonok, Gennadi, Vigklas, Panagiotis (2013)

Serdica Journal of Computing

Similarity:

In 1900 E. B. Van Vleck proposed a very efficient method to compute the Sturm sequence of a polynomial p (x) ∈ Z[x] by triangularizing one of Sylvester’s matrices of p (x) and its derivative p′(x). That method works fine only for the case of complete sequences provided no pivots take place. In 1917, A. J. Pell and R. L. Gordon pointed out this “weakness” in Van Vleck’s theorem, rectified it but did not extend his method, so that it also works in the cases of: (a) complete Sturm sequences...

Sturm Sequences and Modified Subresultant Polynomial Remainder Sequences

Akritas, Alkiviadis, Malaschonok, Gennadi, Vigklas, Panagiotis (2014)

Serdica Journal of Computing

Similarity:

ACM Computing Classification System (1998): F.2.1, G.1.5, I.1.2. In 1971 using pseudo-divisions - that is, by working in Z[x] - Brown and Traub computed Euclid’s polynomial remainder sequences (prs’s) and (proper) subresultant prs’s using sylvester1, the most widely known form of Sylvester’s matrix, whose determinant defines the resultant of two polynomials. In this paper we use, for the first time in the literature, the Pell-Gordon Theorem of 1917, and sylvester2, a little...

On the Remainders Obtained in Finding the Greatest Common Divisor of Two Polynomials

Akritas, Alkiviadis, Malaschonok, Gennadi, Vigklas, Panagiotis (2015)

Serdica Journal of Computing

Similarity:

In 1917 Pell (1) and Gordon used sylvester2, Sylvester’s little known and hardly ever used matrix of 1853, to compute(2) the coefficients of a Sturmian remainder — obtained in applying in Q[x], Sturm’s algorithm on two polynomials f, g ∈ Z[x] of degree n — in terms of the determinants (3) of the corresponding submatrices of sylvester2. Thus, they solved a problem that had eluded both J. J. Sylvester, in 1853, and E. B. Van Vleck, in 1900. (4) In this paper we extend the work by Pell...